Literature DB >> 32623769

Variant effect on splicing regulatory elements, branchpoint usage, and pseudoexonization: Strategies to enhance bioinformatic prediction using hereditary cancer genes as exemplars.

Daffodil Canson1,2, Dylan Glubb1, Amanda B Spurdle1,2.   

Abstract

It is possible to estimate the prior probability of pathogenicity for germline disease gene variants based on bioinformatic prediction of variant effect/s. However, routinely used approaches have likely led to the underestimation and underreporting of variants located outside donor and acceptor splice site motifs that affect messenger RNA (mRNA) processing. This review presents information about hereditary cancer gene germline variants, outside native splice sites, with experimentally validated splicing effects. We list 95 exonic variants that impact splicing regulatory elements (SREs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. We utilized a pre-existing large-scale BRCA1 functional data set to map functional SREs, and assess the relative performance of different tools to predict effects of 283 variants on such elements. We also describe rare examples of intronic variants that impact branchpoint (BP) sites and create pseudoexons. We discuss the challenges in predicting variant effect on BP site usage and pseudoexonization, and suggest strategies to improve the bioinformatic prioritization of such variants for experimental validation. Importantly, our review and analysis highlights the value of considering impact of variants outside donor and acceptor motifs on mRNA splicing and disease causation.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESE; ESS; branchpoint; hereditary cancer genes; pseudoexon; splicing regulatory elements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32623769     DOI: 10.1002/humu.24074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  5 in total

1.  Interaction of CCND2, CDKN1A, and POLD3 Variants in Mexican Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Rogelio Alvizo-Rodríguez; Beatriz Armida Flores-López; María de la Luz Ayala-Madrigal; Miriam Partida-Pérez; Nelly Margarita Macías-Gómez; Jorge Peregrina-Sandoval; Alexis Sayuri Suárez-Villanueva; José Miguel Moreno-Ortiz; Sergio Cervantes-Ortiz; Víctor Manuel Maciel-Gutiérre; Melva Gutiérrez-Angulo
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 1.555

2.  Modeling splicing outcome by combining 5'ss strength and splicing regulatory elements.

Authors:  Lisa Müller; Johannes Ptok; Azlan Nisar; Jennifer Antemann; Ramona Grothmann; Frank Hillebrand; Anna-Lena Brillen; Anastasia Ritchie; Stephan Theiss; Heiner Schaal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 19.160

3.  A spotter's guide to SNPtic exons: The common splice variants underlying some SNP-phenotype correlations.

Authors:  Niall Patrick Keegan; Sue Fletcher
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Analysis of Pathogenic Pseudoexons Reveals Novel Mechanisms Driving Cryptic Splicing.

Authors:  Niall P Keegan; Steve D Wilton; Sue Fletcher
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Computational approaches for predicting variant impact: An overview from resources, principles to applications.

Authors:  Ye Liu; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu; Dandan Cao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.772

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.