Literature DB >> 32623265

Prevalence of mental health symptoms in residential healthcare workers in Michigan during the covid-19 pandemic.

Ana M Daugherty1, Eamonn P Arble2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32623265      PMCID: PMC7324917          DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear editor, The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed an unparalleled burden on the United States healthcare system and its workers. Skilled nursing facilities have been profoundly affected by high rates of patient complications and mortality, and organizational shortfalls (Davidson and Szanton, 2020). Residential healthcare workers must contend with primary and secondary trauma, and the daily concern of disease exposure for themselves and family. Here we characterize the experiences of residential healthcare workers in the Detroit, Michigan metropolitan region during the initial COVID-19 infection peak. As of this writing, Michigan remains in the top 10 states ranked for total number of COVID-19 cases and deaths (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020). The metropolitan Detroit region has 55.58% of COVID-19 confirmed cases and 73.48% of the deaths in Michigan, and approximately a third of deaths have been reported in skilled nursing facilities (State of Michigan, 2020). The high incidence of COVID-19 cases in these facilities, changes in care management procedures, and protective equipment shortages have placed a substantial emotional and psychological burden on healthcare workers in Detroit residential care facilities. Employees in skilled nursing facilities, in-home care agencies and assisted living communities in the metropolitan Detroit region were surveyed online April 29 to May 14, 2020. 148 individuals (75% female; age 22-79 years, M = 51.62, SD = 12.20) began the survey. Respondents were predominantly Caucasian (60%), Black (10.8%), Middle Eastern (2.0%), Asian or Pacific Islander (1.4%). Of the available sample, n = 113 responded to the scales reported here. The survey included standardized self-report measures of PTSD (Blevins et al., 2015), depression, anxiety and stress symptoms (Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995). Questions on changes in daily activity at work, and perceived support at work and home were each rated on a sliding scale of 1 (not at all) to 100 (very much). The study was approved by institutional ethics review boards; participants provided informed consent by initiating the survey. Participants reported 1-46 years work experience in residential healthcare. The majority reported social work (n = 41, 36.3%), nursing (n = 21, 18.6%) or agency director (n = 20, 17.7%) occupations; the remaining sample included occupational therapist (n = 8), administrative staff (n = 7), special care coordinator (n = 6), nurse assistant (n = 3), psychologist (n = 3), physical therapist (n = 2), and a physician. Participant desire to work in healthcare, measured on a scale 1 (decreased) to 100 (increased), appeared unchanged (M = 58.24, SD = 25.94; Mode = 50). Mental health symptoms, on average, fell within the normal range of PTSD (M = 19.83, SD = 16.89), depression (M = 4.13, SD = 4.80), anxiety (M = 3.06, SD = 3.79) and stress (M = 5.87, SD = 4.95); however, 35.4% (n = 40) reported clinical elevations on at least one scale. Sample characteristics and reported experiences during COVID-19 significantly predicted cases with clinical symptom elevation in a multivariable logistic regression [χ2 (9) = 19.00, p = 0.03, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.21]; results are reported with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses controlled for participant age, years of experience, sex and occupation, which were unrelated to clinical symptom elevation (all p ≥ 0.12). Participants reported change in daily activities at work (M = 83.77, SD = 24.17) that was associated with a greater risk for clinical symptom elevation (b = 0.02, p = 0.05; OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00/1.05). There is cause for optimism: employees felt they had sufficient support at work (M = 67.80, SD = 28.09) and home (M = 75.72, SD = 27.76) to adapt to changes in daily activities. Greater support at work (b = -0.02, p = 0.03; OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97/0.99) mitigated the risk for clinical elevation in mental health symptoms, and a lesser effect was observed for support at home (b = -0.01, p = 0.21; OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98/1.01). The diversity of occupations and experiences make residential healthcare unique as compared to other frontline healthcare environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interdisciplinary initiatives to provide psychosocial support may be successful to promote mental health resiliency for healthcare workers in this diverse care setting. As the rate of new COVID-19 cases has plateaued in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020), we can anticipate sustained psychological distress for residential healthcare workers, who oversee the long-term care and post-acute recovery of patients at the highest risk for complications and mortality.

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  3 in total

1.  The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation.

Authors:  Christy A Blevins; Frank W Weathers; Margaret T Davis; Tracy K Witte; Jessica L Domino
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2015-11-25

2.  The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories.

Authors:  P F Lovibond; S H Lovibond
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1995-03

3.  Nursing homes and COVID-19: We can and should do better.

Authors:  Patricia M Davidson; Sarah L Szanton
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.036

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Satisfied as professionals, but also exhausted and worried!!: The role of job demands, resources and emotional experiences of Spanish nursing home workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Luis Manuel Blanco-Donoso; Jennifer Moreno-Jiménez; Laura Gallego-Alberto; Alberto Amutio; Bernardo Moreno-Jiménez; Eva Garrosa
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Nurses in China: A Nationwide Survey During the Outbreak.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Youlin Long; Yifan Cheng; Qiong Guo; Liu Yang; Yifei Lin; Yu Cao; Lei Ye; Yan Jiang; Ka Li; Kun Tian; Xiaoming A; Cheng Sun; Fang Zhang; Xiaoxia Song; Ga Liao; Jin Huang; Liang Du
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Psychosocial burden and associated factors among nurses in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a retrospective survey in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Hering; Annabell Gangnus; Andrea Budnick; Raphael Kohl; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Paul Gellert
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Evaluation of the mental health of care home staff in the Covid-19 era. What price did care home workers pay for standing by their patients?

Authors:  Josune Martín; Ángel Padierna; Ane Villanueva; José M Quintana
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.850

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.