Literature DB >> 32621532

The moderating role of socioeconomic status on level of responsibility, executive functioning, and cortical thinning during adolescence.

Giorgia Picci1,2, Emma J Rose1, John W VanMeter3, Diana H Fishbein1,2,4.   

Abstract

Brain development is exquisitely sensitive to psychosocial experiences, with implications for neurodevelopmental trajectories, for better or worse. The premise of this investigation was that the level of responsibility in adolescence may relate to brain structure and higher-order cognitive functions. In a sample of 108 adolescents, we focused on cortical thickness (using FreeSurfer) as an indicator of neurodevelopment in regions previously implicated in executive functioning (EF) and examined performance on an EF task outside of the scanner, in the context of level of responsibility. We further investigated whether socioeconomic status (SES) and family stress moderated the relationship between responsibility and brain structure or EF. Findings revealed that greater responsibility was related to thinner left precuneus and right middle frontal cortex. In lower SES adolescents, greater responsibility predicted thinner left precuneus and right middle frontal cortex, which have been consistently implicated in EF. Higher SES adolescents did not show structural differences related to responsibility, however, they did exhibit better EF performance. It may be that circumstances surrounding the need for greater responsibility in lower SES households are detrimental to neurodevelopment compared to higher SES households. Alternatively, responsibility may act as a protective factor that bolsters cortical thinning in regions related to EF.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescence; brain development; cortical thickness; executive functioning; responsibility; socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32621532      PMCID: PMC7779694          DOI: 10.1002/dev.22010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  63 in total

Review 1.  Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: Multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Alexandra Ursache; Kimberly G Noble
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  F Collette; M Hogge; E Salmon; M Van der Linden
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Physiological substrates of executive functioning: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bailey A Munro; Lisa L Weyandt; Lily E Hall; Danielle R Oster; Bergljot Gyda Gudmundsdottir; Benjamin G Kuhar
Journal:  Atten Defic Hyperact Disord       Date:  2017-03-22

4.  Meaningful family relationships: neurocognitive buffers of adolescent risk taking.

Authors:  Eva H Telzer; Andrew J Fuligni; Matthew D Lieberman; Adriana Galván
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  The development of adolescent self-regulation: reviewing the role of parent, peer, friend, and romantic relationships.

Authors:  Julee P Farley; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2014-04-02

6.  The development of adolescents' internalizing behavior: longitudinal effects of maternal sensitivity and child inhibition.

Authors:  Anja van der Voort; Mariëlle Linting; Femmie Juffer; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Christie Schoenmaker; Marinus H van Ijzendoorn
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2013-07-05

7.  The effects of exposure to violence and victimization across life domains on adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Emily M Wright; Abigail A Fagan; Gillian M Pinchevsky
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2013-06-03

Review 8.  Child Maltreatment and Risk for Psychopathology in Childhood and Adulthood.

Authors:  Sara R Jaffee
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 18.561

9.  Executive functions as endophenotypes in ADHD: evidence from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB).

Authors:  Susan Shur-Fen Gau; Chi-Yung Shang
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 10.  Socioeconomic status and structural brain development.

Authors:  Natalie H Brito; Kimberly G Noble
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.