Allisson Filipe Lopes Martins1, Túlio Eduardo Nogueira2, Marília Oliveira Morais3, Sebastião Silvério de Sousa-Neto1, Angélica Ferreira Oton-Leite3, Marize Campos Valadares4, Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas5, Cláudio Rodrigues Leles2, Elismauro Francisco Mendonça6. 1. Laboratory of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Esquina com 1ª Avenida, s/n. Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74605-220, Brazil. 2. Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Esquina com 1ª Avenida, s/n. Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74605-220, Brazil. 3. Araujo Jorge Cancer Hospital, R. 239, 206 - Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74175-120, Brazil. 4. Laboratory of Pharmacology and Cellular Toxicology, Pharmacy Faculty, Federal University of Goias, 5ª Avenida Esquina com Rua 240, s/n. Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74605-170, Brazil. 5. Department of Radiotherapy, Araujo Jorge Cancer Hospital, R. 239, 206-Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74175-120, Brazil. 6. Department of Prevention and Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Avenida Universitária Esquina com 1ª Avenida, s/n. Setor Universitário, Goiânia, Goiás, CEP 74605-220, Brazil. elismaur@ufg.br.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in association with a Preventive Oral Care Program (POCP) compared with POCP alone in the treatment of radiotherapy (RT)-induced oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: The cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the health provider perspective and conducted alongside a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either PBMT (n = 25) or control (n = 23) group. The PBMT group participants received PBMT associated with POCP. In the control group, patients were submitted to POCP alone. Costs were identified, quantified, and valued through observation and consultation of the hospital's financial sector database and estimated in Brazilian real and converted to international dollars using the purchasing power parity exchange rate. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by considering the prevention of severe OM, interruption of RT, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) scores, measured by the OHIP-14 and patient-reported OM symptoms scale (PROMS). RESULTS: The incremental cost of PBMT was $857.35, and the cost per session was $25.69. The ICER was $ 2867.39 to avoid one case of severe OM and $ 2756.75 to prevent one interruption in RT due to OM. ICER to reduce 1 point in OHIP-14 and PROMS scores were $170.79 and $31.75, respectively. CONCLUSION: PBMT is more cost-effective than POCP alone in preventing severe OM, worsening of the OHRQoL, and RT interruptions. PBMT is a promising therapy, especially to avoid interruptions in oncological treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ReBEC-RBR-5h4y4n.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in association with a Preventive Oral Care Program (POCP) compared with POCP alone in the treatment of radiotherapy (RT)-induced oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: The cost-effectiveness was evaluated from the health provider perspective and conducted alongside a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either PBMT (n = 25) or control (n = 23) group. The PBMT group participants received PBMT associated with POCP. In the control group, patients were submitted to POCP alone. Costs were identified, quantified, and valued through observation and consultation of the hospital's financial sector database and estimated in Brazilian real and converted to international dollars using the purchasing power parity exchange rate. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by considering the prevention of severe OM, interruption of RT, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) scores, measured by the OHIP-14 and patient-reported OM symptoms scale (PROMS). RESULTS: The incremental cost of PBMT was $857.35, and the cost per session was $25.69. The ICER was $ 2867.39 to avoid one case of severe OM and $ 2756.75 to prevent one interruption in RT due to OM. ICER to reduce 1 point in OHIP-14 and PROMS scores were $170.79 and $31.75, respectively. CONCLUSION: PBMT is more cost-effective than POCP alone in preventing severe OM, worsening of the OHRQoL, and RT interruptions. PBMT is a promising therapy, especially to avoid interruptions in oncological treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ReBEC-RBR-5h4y4n.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost-effectiveness; Low-level laser; Oral mucositis; Photobiomodulation therapy; Quality of life
Authors: Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Anne Littlewood; Luisa M Fernandez Mauleffinch; Jan E Clarkson; Martin G McCabe Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Kristina Bertl; Philippe Savvidis; Edmund Benjamin Kukla; Steffen Schneider; Konstantin Zauza; Corinna Bruckmann; Andreas Stavropoulos Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-11-18 Impact factor: 3.573