Literature DB >> 32620147

Nafamostat mesylate treatment in combination with favipiravir for patients critically ill with Covid-19: a case series.

Kent Doi1, Mahoko Ikeda2, Naoki Hayase3, Kyoji Moriya2,4, Naoto Morimura3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32620147      PMCID: PMC7332736          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03078-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
Development of specific therapy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is urgently required. Several drugs such as antimalarial and anti-Ebola virus drugs are under investigation for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) plays a crucial role for SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cytoplasm [1]. Inhibition of TMPRSS2 protease activity is assumed to prohibit viral entry of SARS-CoV-2. Through high-throughput screening of 1017 existing drugs, a clinically available serine protease inhibitor nafamostat mesylate was identified as a potent inhibitor of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry into human epithelial cells [2]. More recently, nafamostat mesylate was shown to inhibit the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into the human epithelial cells at EC50 of ~ 10 nM [3, 4]. Nafamostat mesylate has been clinically used for the treatment of acute pancreatitis and disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan. By intravenous administration, its blood concentrations are maintained at 30–240 nM, which are sufficient to block the virus entry [3]. An anti-influenza A H1N1 virus drug favipiravir exhibits antiviral activity against other RNA viruses and therefore is expected to have antiviral action against SARS-CoV-2. This drug has been approved in Japan for novel influenza virus disease. Eleven adults with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at The University of Tokyo Hospital between April 6 and April 21, 2020, and treated with nafamostat mesylate in combination with favipiravir. The demographic and clinical characteristics and the laboratory and radiologic findings at ICU admission are listed in Table 1. All the patients needed oxygen therapy. Eight patients (73%) needed invasive mechanical ventilation (MV), and 3 patients (27%) needed venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and imaging results at ICU admission

CharacteristicMeasurement
Age, median (IQR), years68 (60–69)
Male, no. (%)10 (91%)
Body weight, median (IQR), kg71 (69–82)
Number of patients with coexisting disorders, no. (%)
 Asthma0 (0%)
 Cancer1 (9%)
 Chronic kidney disease0 (0%)
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease1 (9%)
 Diabetes mellitus3 (27%)
 Hypertension4 (36%)
Duration of symptoms before admission, median (IQR), days8 (7–11)
Number of patients with symptoms, no. (%)
 Fever9 (82%)
 Cough5 (45%)
 Shortness of breath8 (73%)
Laboratory data
 White blood cell count, median (IQR), per mm36900 (5800–10,850)
 Lymphocyte count, median (IQR), per mm3851 (759–1164)
 Hemoglobin, median (IQR), g/dl15.0 (13.5–16.3)
 Platelet count, median (IQR), per mm319.6 (18.6–26.4)
 Lactate dehydrogenase level, median (IQR), U/l518 (417–752)
 Aspartate aminotransferase level, median (IQR), U/l54 (49–90)
 Alanine aminotransferase level, median (IQR), U/l47 (35–58)
 Serum creatinine level, median (IQR), mg/dl0.85 (0.70–1.03)
 Creatinine kinase level, median (IQR), U/l213 (129–579)
 Prothrombin time, median (IQR), international normalized ratio1.08 (1.03–1.13)
 Activated partial thromboplastin time, median (IQR), s28.8 (28.4–32.1)
d-dimer level, median (IQR), μg/dl1.4 (1.1–11.8)
 PaO2/FiO2 ratio, median (IQR)131 (114–198)
 SOFA score, median (IQR)3.0 (2.5–4.5)
 APACHE II score, median (IQR)14.0 (12.0–15.5)
Computed tomography findings
 Patients with consolidation, no. (%)6 (55%)
 Patients with ground-glass opacities, no. (%)10 (91%)
 Patients with pulmonary infiltration, no. (%)2 (18%)

APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, FiO fraction of inspired oxygen, ICU intensive care unit, IQR interquartile range, PaO partial pressure of arterial oxygen, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment

Clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and imaging results at ICU admission APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, FiO fraction of inspired oxygen, ICU intensive care unit, IQR interquartile range, PaO partial pressure of arterial oxygen, SOFA sequential organ failure assessment Patients received combination treatment with nafamostat mesylate [0.2 mg per kg per hour by continuous intravenous infusion, median treatment 14 days (IQR, 10 to 14 days)] and favipiravir [3600 mg on day 1 and at 1600 mg per day on day 2 and subsequently median treatment 14 days (IQR, 12 to 14 days)]. No interruption of antiviral treatment occurred due to adverse drug reactions except for one patient who developed hyperkalemia on day 9 (by nafamostat mesylate). All 11 patients had at least 33 days of hospital follow-up. As of May 22, 1 patient, who had a do-not-resuscitate order, died on ICU day 7. Seven patients were successfully weaned from MV [median duration of MV 16 days (IQR, 10 to 19 days)] and 9 and 7 patients were discharged from the ICU and the hospital, respectively (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Respiratory support and outcomes of individual patients. As of May 22, 2020, 1 patient had died, while 7 patients had been extubated. All the patients receiving follow-up monitoring for at least 33 days. ICU, intensive care unit; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; DNR, do-not-resuscitate

Respiratory support and outcomes of individual patients. As of May 22, 2020, 1 patient had died, while 7 patients had been extubated. All the patients receiving follow-up monitoring for at least 33 days. ICU, intensive care unit; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; DNR, do-not-resuscitate This is the first report on nafamostat mesylate treatment in combination with favipiravir against Covid-19. In comparison with previous reports about critically ill patients with Covid-19, our case series also demonstrated a high number of patients (8 [73%]) who required MV requirement; however, the mortality rate was low (1 patient [9%]). Patients with severe Covid-19 often suffer from microvascular thrombosis and hemorrhage with extensive alveolar and interstitial inflammation in the lung [5]. Nafamostat mesylate might thus be effective, because it inhibits intravascular coagulopathy, in addition to directly targeting the virus entry in host epithelial cells. In conclusion, nafamostat mesylate therapy in combination with favipiravir may allow blockade of virus entry and replication, as well as inhibition of pathogenic host response, i.e., hyper-coagulopathy. Although the number of patients in this case series was very small, this low mortality rate suggests that combination treatment of favipiravir and nafamostat mesylate may be effective for critically ill Covid-19 patients. A clinical trial for the combination treatment of nafamostat mesylate and favipiravir against Covid-19 will be initiated in Japan (jRCTs031200026).
  4 in total

1.  Identification of Nafamostat as a Potent Inhibitor of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus S Protein-Mediated Membrane Fusion Using the Split-Protein-Based Cell-Cell Fusion Assay.

Authors:  Mizuki Yamamoto; Shutoku Matsuyama; Xiao Li; Makoto Takeda; Yasushi Kawaguchi; Jun-Ichiro Inoue; Zene Matsuda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Nafamostat Mesylate Blocks Activation of SARS-CoV-2: New Treatment Option for COVID-19.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Simon Schroeder; Hannah Kleine-Weber; Marcel A Müller; Christian Drosten; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Hannah Kleine-Weber; Simon Schroeder; Nadine Krüger; Tanja Herrler; Sandra Erichsen; Tobias S Schiergens; Georg Herrler; Nai-Huei Wu; Andreas Nitsche; Marcel A Müller; Christian Drosten; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The Anticoagulant Nafamostat Potently Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 S Protein-Mediated Fusion in a Cell Fusion Assay System and Viral Infection In Vitro in a Cell-Type-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Mizuki Yamamoto; Maki Kiso; Yuko Sakai-Tagawa; Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto; Masaki Imai; Makoto Takeda; Noriko Kinoshita; Norio Ohmagari; Jin Gohda; Kentaro Semba; Zene Matsuda; Yasushi Kawaguchi; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Jun-Ichiro Inoue
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.048

  4 in total
  40 in total

1.  Screening strategy of TMPRSS2 inhibitors by FRET-based enzymatic activity for TMPRSS2-based cancer and COVID-19 treatment.

Authors:  Yeh Chen; Wei-Chien Huang; Chia-Shin Yang; Fang-Ju Cheng; Yi-Fang Chiu; Hsiao-Fan Chen; Thanh Kieu Huynh; Chih-Feng Huang; Chia-Hung Chen; Hsueh-Chun Wang; Mien-Chie Hung
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Drugs that Might Be Possibly Used for Treatment of COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Mehdi Salih Shihab; Baram Hamah-Ameen
Journal:  Russ J Bioorg Chem       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 0.796

Review 3.  Cytokine Storm: The Primary Determinant for the Pathophysiological Evolution of COVID-19 Deterioration.

Authors:  Ruirong Chen; Zhien Lan; Jujian Ye; Limin Pang; Yi Liu; Wei Wu; Xiaohuan Qin; Yang Guo; Peidong Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized polystyrene column for COVID-19.

Authors:  Daisuke Katagiri; Masahiro Ishikane; Yusuke Asai; Shinyu Izumi; Jin Takasaki; Hiyori Katsuoka; Isao Kondo; Satoshi Ide; Keiji Nakamura; Takato Nakamoto; Hidetoshi Nomoto; Yutaro Akiyama; Yusuke Miyazato; Tetsuya Suzuki; Noriko Kinoshita; Tatsunori Ogawa; Tomiteru Togano; Manabu Suzuki; Masao Hashimoto; Keita Sakamoto; Yusaku Kusaba; Takashi Katsuno; Takashi Fukaya; Masayuki Hojo; Masaya Sugiyama; Masashi Mizokami; Tatsuya Okamoto; Akio Kimura; Eisei Noiri; Norio Ohmagari; Fumihiko Hinoshita; Haruhito Sugiyama
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 5.  Therapeutic strategies to fight COVID-19: Which is the status artis?

Authors:  Cristina Scavone; Annamaria Mascolo; Concetta Rafaniello; Liberata Sportiello; Ugo Trama; Alice Zoccoli; Francesca Futura Bernardi; Giorgio Racagni; Liberato Berrino; Giuseppe Castaldo; Enrico Coscioni; Francesco Rossi; Annalisa Capuano
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 9.473

Review 6.  Clinical Management of COVID-19: A Review of Pharmacological Treatment Options.

Authors:  Ashli M Heustess; Melissa A Allard; Dorothea K Thompson; Pius S Fasinu
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28

7.  Favipiravir for the treatment of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshie Manabe; Dan Kambayashi; Hiroyasu Akatsu; Koichiro Kudo
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 8.  Role of Iron Chelation and Protease Inhibition of Natural Products on COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Giuseppe Carota; Simone Ronsisvalle; Federica Panarello; Daniele Tibullo; Anna Nicolosi; Giovanni Li Volti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Clinical efficacy of Nafamostat Mesylate in combination with Favipiravir for COVID-19 pneumonia treatment review article.

Authors:  Maram H Abduljabbar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-14

10.  Preventing the clinical manifestations and disease progression of coronavirus disease using clinically proven protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Tomoya Sagawa; Ken-Ichiro Inoue; Hirohisa Takano
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.