Literature DB >> 32619911

Residential green is associated with reduced annoyance to road traffic and railway noise but increased annoyance to aircraft noise exposure.

Beat Schäffer1, Mark Brink2, Felix Schlatter3, Danielle Vienneau4, Jean Marc Wunderli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, residential green and availability of neighbourhood green spaces came into focus as a potential means to reduce transportation noise annoyance. Literature suggests that various characteristics of residential green may play a role, namely, greenness of the residential areas as quantified by the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), visible vegetation from home, and the presence of public green spaces as identified by land use classification data (LU-green), as well as their accessibility and noise pollution (i.e., transportation noise exposure within green areas, how loud/quiet they are). So far, studies mostly focused on road traffic noise in urban areas.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effects of residential green on noise annoyance, accounting for different transportation noise sources as well as for the degree of urbanisation.
METHODS: We complemented the data set of the recent Swiss SiRENE survey on road traffic, railway and aircraft noise annoyance with a wide range of "green" metrics, and investigated their association with annoyance by means of logistic regression analysis (generalized estimating equations).
RESULTS: Increasing residential green was found to be associated with reduced road traffic and railway noise annoyance, but increased aircraft noise annoyance. The overall effect corresponded to equivalent level reductions of about 6 dB for road traffic and 3 dB for railway noise, but to an increase of about 10 dB for aircraft noise, when residential green increased from "not much green" (5th percentile of the study sample distribution) to "a lot of green" (95th percentile). Overall, NDVI and LU-green were particularly strongly linked to annoyance. The effects of visible vegetation from home and accessibility and/or quietness of green spaces were, overall, less strong, but depended on the degree of urbanisation. For road traffic noise, visible vegetation and accessibility of green spaces seem to particularly strongly reduce annoyance in cities, while quiet green spaces are more effective in rural areas.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasizes that residential green should be fostered by city planners, particularly in densely populated areas.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure–response curve; Green space; Greenness; Noise annoyance; Residential green; Transportation noise

Year:  2020        PMID: 32619911     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  4 in total

1.  How Does a Community Respond to Changes in Aircraft Noise? A Comparison of Two Surveys Conducted 11 Years Apart in Ho Chi Minh City.

Authors:  Bach Lien Trieu; Thu Lan Nguyen; Yasuhiro Hiraguri; Makoto Morinaga; Takashi Morihara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Will the economic growth benefit public health? Health vulnerability, urbanization and COVID-19 in the USA.

Authors:  Ye Fan; Ming Fang; Xin Zhang; Yongda Yu
Journal:  Ann Reg Sci       Date:  2022-01-22

Review 3.  Remote work: Aircraft noise implications, prediction, and management in the built environment.

Authors:  Linus Yinn Leng Ang; Fangsen Cui
Journal:  Appl Acoust       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.614

4.  The influence of a signal's time structure on the perceived noise annoyance of road traffic noise.

Authors:  Jan Felcyn
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-04-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.