Filip E F Thiessen1, Thierry Tondu2, Veronique Verhoeven3, Guy Hubens4, Gunther Steenackers5, Wiebren A A Tjalma6. 1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Lindendreef 1, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: filip.thiessen@clinic12b.be. 2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium and Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, Lindendreef 1, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium. 3. Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Department of Abdominal, Paediatric and Reconstructive Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Op3Mech Research GroupUniversity of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020, Antwerp, Belgium. 6. Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic, Gynecological Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sir:We read with interest the article by Mavioso et al. this is a valuable pilot study on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in preoperative mapping of perforators with computed tomography (CTA) [1]. Selection of the best perforators is of uttermost importance, as it is the only source of blood supply to the flap. This selection reduces operative time, lower complication rates and ensure an overall better result [2]. The current gold standard for perforator selection is CTA but it has disadvantages: use of intravenous (IV) contrast agents and ionizing radiation, high purchasing costs, a lack of perioperative usability, and a lack of physiological information on flow characteristics [3]. The use of AI will improve reproducibility and decrease time-consuming human input in perforator selection [1]. Dynamic Infrared Thermography (DIRT) can be an alternative technique in perforator mapping and perfusion assesment [4,5]. DIRT is less invasive than CTA as it does not use radiation nor contrast agents [[4], [5], [6], [7]]. We developed a standardized measuremet set-up for the use of DIRT during breast reconstruction with perforator flaps [8]. With this set-up AI can potentialy be an interesting tool in assessing perforators and perfusion pre-, per- and postoperatively with DIRT.
Authors: Filip E F Thiessen; Thierry Tondu; Ben Cloostermans; Yarince A L Dirkx; Dorien Auman; Stefaan Cox; Veronique Verhoeven; Guy Hubens; Gunther Steenackers; Wiebren A A Tjalma Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Filip E F Thiessen; Thierry Tondu; Nicolas Vermeersch; Ben Cloostermans; Ralv Lundahl; Bart Ribbens; Lawek Berzenji; Veronique Verhoeven; Guy Hubens; Gunther Steenackers; Wiebren A A Tjalma Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2019-12
Authors: Carlos Mavioso; Ricardo J Araújo; Hélder P Oliveira; João C Anacleto; Maria Antónia Vasconcelos; David Pinto; Pedro F Gouveia; Celeste Alves; Fátima Cardoso; Jaime S Cardoso; Maria João Cardoso Journal: Breast Date: 2020-01-12 Impact factor: 4.380