Literature DB >> 32619242

Glycemic index, glycemic load, and risk of coronary heart disease: a pan-European cohort study.

Sabina Sieri1, Claudia Agnoli1, Sara Grioni1, Elisabete Weiderpass2, Amalia Mattiello3, Ivonne Sluijs4, Maria Jose Sanchez5,6,7,8, Marianne Uhre Jakobsen9, Michael Sweeting10,11, Yvonne T van der Schouw4, Lena Maria Nilsson12, Patrik Wennberg13, Verena A Katzke14, Tilman Kühn14, Kim Overvad15, Tammy Y N Tong16, Moreno-Iribas Conchi17, José Ramón Quirós18, Juan Manuel García-Torrecillas19, Olatz Mokoroa20, Jesús-Humberto Gómez21, Anne Tjønneland22,23, Emiliy Sonestedt24, Antonia Trichopoulou25, Anna Karakatsani25,26, Elissavet Valanou25, Jolanda M A Boer27, W M Monique Verschuren27, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault28,29, Guy Fagherazzi28,29, Anne-Laure Madika28,29,30, Manuela M Bergmann31, Matthias B Schulze32,33,34, Pietro Ferrari2, Heinz Freisling2, Hannah Lennon2, Carlotta Sacerdote35, Giovanna Masala36, Rosario Tumino37, Elio Riboli38, Nicholas J Wareham39, John Danesh10, Nita G Forouhi39, Adam S Butterworth10, Vittorio Krogh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High carbohydrate intake raises blood triglycerides, glucose, and insulin; reduces HDLs; and may increase risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Epidemiological studies indicate that high dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) are associated with increased CHD risk.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether dietary GI, GL, and available carbohydrates are associated with CHD risk in both sexes.
METHODS: This large prospective study-the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-consisted of 338,325 participants who completed a dietary questionnaire. HRs with 95% CIs for a CHD event, in relation to intake of GI, GL, and carbohydrates, were estimated using covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: After 12.8 y (median), 6378 participants had experienced a CHD event. High GL was associated with greater CHD risk [HR 1.16 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.31) highest vs. lowest quintile, p-trend 0.035; HR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.29) per 50 g/day of GL intake]. The association between GL and CHD risk was evident in subjects with BMI (in kg/m2) ≥25 [HR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.35) per 50 g/d] but not in those with BMI <25 [HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.22) per 50 g/d) (P-interaction = 0.022). The GL-CHD association did not differ between men [HR: 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.30) per 50 g/d] and women [HR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.40) per 50 g/d] (test for interaction not significant). GI was associated with CHD risk only in the continuous model [HR: 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.08) per 5 units/d]. High available carbohydrate was associated with greater CHD risk [HR: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.18) per 50 g/d]. High sugar intake was associated with greater CHD risk [HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.17) per 50 g/d].
CONCLUSIONS: This large pan-European study provides robust additional support for the hypothesis that a diet that induces a high glucose response is associated with greater CHD risk.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPIC study; EPIC-CVD study; cohort study; coronary heart disease; glycemic index; glycemic load

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32619242      PMCID: PMC7458777          DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  51 in total

1.  Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Liu; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; M D Holmes; F B Hu; S E Hankinson; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Influence of dietary carbohydrate and fat on LDL and HDL particle distributions.

Authors:  Patty W Siri; Ronald M Krauss
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.

Authors:  W Willett; M J Stampfer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Food glycemic index, as given in glycemic index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Ming Yang; Xiao Yi Zeng; Fiona Atkinson; Janette C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition.

Authors:  E Riboli; R Kaaks
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Low-carbohydrate-diet score and the risk of coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  Thomas L Halton; Walter C Willett; Simin Liu; JoAnn E Manson; Christine M Albert; Kathryn Rexrode; Frank B Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Sugar sweetened beverages consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Chen Huang; Jianfeng Huang; Yu Tian; Xueli Yang; Dongfeng Gu
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  Dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and endometrial cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Nadia Slimani; Rudolf Kaaks; Marit van Bakel; Carine Biessy; Pietro Ferrari; Martine Laville; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Martin Lajous; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Jakob Linseisen; Sabine Rohrmann; Ute Nöthlings; Heiner Boeing; Domenico Palli; Sabina Sieri; Salvatore Panico; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Guri Skeie; Dagrun Engeset; Inger Torhild Gram; J Ramón Quirós; Paula Jakszyn; María José Sánchez; Nerea Larrañaga; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Elisabet Wirfält; Göran Berglund; Eva Lundin; Göran Hallmans; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Huaidong Du; Petra H M Peeters; Sheila Bingham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Naomi E Allen; Timothy J Key; Mazda Jenab; Elio Riboli
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Associations of Biomarker-Calibrated Intake of Total Sugars With the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Natasha Tasevska; Mary Pettinger; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Lesley F Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Marian L Neuhouser; Jeannette M Beasley; Linda Van Horn; Barbara V Howard; Simin Liu; JoAnn E Manson; James M Shikany; Cynthia A Thomson; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 10.  The EPIC nutrient database project (ENDB): a first attempt to standardize nutrient databases across the 10 European countries participating in the EPIC study.

Authors:  N Slimani; G Deharveng; I Unwin; D A T Southgate; J Vignat; G Skeie; S Salvini; M Parpinel; A Møller; J Ireland; W Becker; A Farran; S Westenbrink; E Vasilopoulou; J Unwin; A Borgejordet; S Rohrmann; S Church; P Gnagnarella; C Casagrande; M van Bakel; M Niravong; M C Boutron-Ruault; C Stripp; A Tjønneland; A Trichopoulou; K Georga; S Nilsson; I Mattisson; J Ray; H Boeing; M Ocké; P H M Peeters; P Jakszyn; P Amiano; D Engeset; E Lund; M Santucci de Magistris; C Sacerdote; A Welch; S Bingham; A F Subar; E Riboli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  8 in total

1.  Tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars.

Authors:  Dominique Turck; Torsten Bohn; Jacqueline Castenmiller; Stefaan de Henauw; Karen Ildico Hirsch-Ernst; Helle Katrine Knutsen; Alexander Maciuk; Inge Mangelsdorf; Harry J McArdle; Androniki Naska; Carmen Peláez; Kristina Pentieva; Alfonso Siani; Frank Thies; Sophia Tsabouri; Roger Adan; Pauline Emmett; Carlo Galli; Mathilde Kersting; Paula Moynihan; Luc Tappy; Laura Ciccolallo; Agnès de Sesmaisons-Lecarré; Lucia Fabiani; Zsuzsanna Horvath; Laura Martino; Irene Muñoz Guajardo; Silvia Valtueña Martínez; Marco Vinceti
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-02-28

2.  Dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and mortality: Japan Public Health Center-based prospective study.

Authors:  Hsi-Lan Huang; Sarah Krull Abe; Norie Sawada; Ribeka Takachi; Junko Ishihara; Motoki Iwasaki; Taiki Yamaji; Hiroyasu Iso; Tetsuya Mizoue; Mitsuhiko Noda; Masahiro Hashizume; Manami Inoue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 3.  Fat, Sugar or Gut Microbiota in Reducing Cardiometabolic Risk: Does Diet Type Really Matter?

Authors:  Katarzyna Nabrdalik; Katarzyna Krzyżak; Weronika Hajzler; Karolina Drożdż; Hanna Kwiendacz; Janusz Gumprecht; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  Tackling Atherosclerosis via Selected Nutrition.

Authors:  Anna Vesnina; Alexander Prosekov; Victor Atuchin; Varvara Minina; Anastasia Ponasenko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  The association of Carbohydrate Quality Index with cardiovascular disease risk factors among women with overweight and obesity: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Darya Khosravinia; Farideh Shiraseb; Atieh Mirzababaei; Elnaz Daneshzad; Shahin Jamili; Cain C T Clark; Khadijeh Mirzaei
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-08

6.  Knockdown of lncRNA ENST00000609755.1 Confers Protection Against Early oxLDL-Induced Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Shuna Huang; Chunyu Wan; Qishuang Ruan; Xiaoxu Xie; Donghong Wei; Guobo Li; Shaowei Lin; Huangyuan Li; Siying Wu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21

Review 7.  The Potential Health Benefits of the Ketogenic Diet: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Dowis; Simran Banga
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Perspective: Does Glycemic Index Matter for Weight Loss and Obesity Prevention? Examination of the Evidence on "Fast" Compared with "Slow" Carbs.

Authors:  Glenn A Gaesser; Julie Miller Jones; Siddhartha S Angadi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 8.701

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.