Literature DB >> 32618766

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: Are nurses prepared?

Elena Flowers1, Heather Leutwyler, Janet K Shim.   

Abstract

Genomic testing is increasingly common in the consumer marketplace. The role of nurses in educating and counseling patients requires them to be prepared to respond to questions about the results of direct-to-consumer genomic testing. This article describes one individual's reflections upon undergoing this testing, the challenges of interpreting the results, and nursing considerations for integrating these results into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32618766      PMCID: PMC7410263          DOI: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000684200.71662.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nursing        ISSN: 0360-4039


  10 in total

1.  The impact of personal genomics on risk perceptions and medical decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua L Krieger; Fiona Murray; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA.

Authors:  Ilan Dar-Nimrod; Steven J Heine
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science.

Authors:  F S Collins; V A McKusick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; J Scott Roberts; Thomas D Bird; Ellen J Steinbart; L Adrienne Cupples; Clara A Chen; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 6.  Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Jennifer K Wagner; Sarah C Nelson; Gail H Javitt; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases.

Authors:  Thomas Schäfer; Marcus A Schwarz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-11

8.  A theoretical framework for interaction of nursing discipline with genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Jiale Hu; Leilei Yu; Shokoufeh Modanloo; Yiyan Zhou; Yan Yang
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-09-06

9.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Rachel Horton; Gillian Crawford; Lindsey Freeman; Angela Fenwick; Caroline F Wright; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-16

10.  Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Deanna Alexis Carere; Tyler J VanderWeele; Jason L Vassy; Cathelijne H van der Wouden; J Scott Roberts; Peter Kraft; Robert C Green
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 8.822

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.