Literature DB >> 32618640

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: The COVID-19 Era.

Sahil Khanna1, Darrell Pardi1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32618640      PMCID: PMC7273935          DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


× No keyword cloud information.
Long before coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) was deemed to be a human infection, Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been among the top 5 urgent infectious threats identified by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Management recommendations for primary CDI and first CDI recurrence includes antibiotic regimens of oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin. Recurrent CDI incidence is at an all-time high, and recurrence rates are as high as 60% after 3 or more infections (1). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), although not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), is widely used to manage recurrent CDI and has demonstrated success rates of 90% to prevent recurrent CDI compared with 40% with antibiotic regimens (2). These therapies are dependent on the procurement of stool from well-screened healthy donors. Despite the institution of screening procedures, there have been serious adverse events reported related to FMT due to transmission of infectious agents from asymptomatic donors to recipients (3). In addition to these 2 cases of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli, the US FDA has recently reported 6 patients who received FMT for recurrent CDI who developed infections after FMT, 2 with enteropathogenic E. coli, and 4 with Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (4). COVID-19 is caused by a novel beta coronavirus believed to be originated from wild bats, with increasing reports of human-to-human community transmission. Clinical features include fever, cough, chest tightness, dyspnea, transient diarrhea, and, in severe cases, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, intensive care admission, and death (5,6). The average incubation period is 5 days, and there is an unknown fraction of the asymptomatic population in the community carrying this novel coronavirus. Respiratory droplet transmission is the primary mode but feco-oral transmission is being emergingly reported. There have been reports of prolonged shedding in the stool after recovery from respiratory illness, which is also likely contributing to community spread of COVID-19 (7). There are several important considerations while considering FMT to prevent recurrent CDI in the era of COVID-19 to protect patients and avoid transmission of COVID-19.

MAKE AN ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF RECURRENT CDI

Now, as always, an accurate diagnosis of recurrent CDI is essential because about 20% of patients develop postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome after CDI and symptoms overlap with recurrent CDI (8). In addition, there is also a high risk of persistently positive nucleic acid–based assay after resolved CDI. To make a diagnosis of primary and recurrent CDI, there needs to be the presence of (i) risk factors for CDI, (ii) symptoms of diarrhea with or without abdominal pain, (iii) a positive nucleic acid or toxin-based assay, and (iv) a response to treatment with vancomycin or fidaxomicin (primary nonresponse is extremely rare and suggests an alternate diagnosis) (Table 1). Symptoms of CDI typically resolve while on antibiotic therapy for CDI, but symptoms recur shortly after the antibiotic is stopped. In patients who do not meet all 4 criteria above, especially #2 and/or #4, an alternate diagnosis should be considered. Patients who are diagnosed with multiply recurrent CDI (by meeting all 4 criteria above) are considered good candidates for FMT. In some instances, those with refractory or fulminant CDI also may benefit from FMT to treat acute CDI and improve mortality.
Table 1.

How to make an accurate diagnosis of CDI

How to make an accurate diagnosis of CDI

STOOL BANKING DURING THE COVID-19 ERA

Access to FMT varies with the type of healthcare establishment and geographic location. Fresh and freeze thawed stool has shown similar efficacy for the management of recurrent CDI (9). Using standard well-screened donors who have undergone rigorous stool testing for repeated donations, and storing and banking stool makes FMT more accessible and cost-effective (10). There are commercial stool banks available, and some centers maintain their own stool banks. A typical “dose” for FMT is 50 g of donor stool mixed in a 150–250 mL diluent. One bowel movement from a donor can be split to multiple doses. Donor stool from multiple donors are not pooled at this time. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, donor stool obtained and banked before December 2019 must be stored separately from stool donated and stored after December 1, 2019. This is in accordance with recent guidance from the US FDA for studies performing FMT under an investigational new drug application (11). The shelf life of frozen donor stool is not known but viability up to 6 months has been demonstrated (12). It is unclear how many doses of FMT may be available that have been collected before December 2019. In the current era, stool donation can be continued only for use in very few clinical instances described below.

DONOR TESTING FOR INFECTIONS AND NOVEL CORONAVIRUS

Apart from the general health screening questions and blood tests, several stool tests are recommended for donors including those for enteric pathogens and screening for multidrug-resistant infections (13). In the era of COVID-19, with the presence of diarrhea in patients with COVID-19 and perhaps asymptomatic shedding in stool along with feco-oral transmission, virus being detectable in stool after being undetectable in the respiratory tract, there is definitely a need to screen donor stool for the presence of this virus (14). However, there are several challenges to this approach because there are not enough tests available to diagnose symptomatic people, respiratory swab-based tests are not validated for asymptomatic people (i.e., donors), validated stool assays for asymptomatic carriage are not available, and finally, the absence of a respiratory coronavirus in an asymptomatic person does not rule out fecal carriage and transmission. Before every stool donation, donors should be screened for a travel history and COVID-19 symptoms and contact with patients infected with COVID-19. Donors who fail this screen should be excluded from donating stool and channeled through the local resources available for COVID-19 screening, testing, and self-isolation if applicable. Because the disease is now a pandemic worldwide, donors who pass this screen should be considered for COVID-19 testing (nasal swab or stool) if adequate numbers of test kits become available. Stool from these donors can be processed, stored, and should be embargoed for at least 14 days and donors should be rescreened with symptom questions and testing for COVID-19. If donors fail rescreening, the stool should be discarded (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

An algorithm for donor screening and stool banking for fecal microbiota transplantation.

Once tests for COVID-19 become readily available and validated for screening asymptomatic individuals, donor screening should routinely incorporate nasal swab and stool testing for COVID-19. If the testing sensitivity remains low, then multiple tests may be needed to reduce the likelihood of false negatives. As serological tests become available, an immunoglobulin G response could be used as a marker of recovery from previous COVID-19 exposure. Finally, as a vaccine becomes available, vaccination against COVID-19 would become required to qualify to be a stool donor.

AN APPROACH TO MANAGING RECURRENT CDI IN THE COVID-19 ERA

Despite antibiotic treatment after a primary infection, the risk of recurrent CDI is 20%–30%; after a second infection, the risk of recurrence is 40%–50%; and after a third infection, the risk of recurrence over 60% after antibiotics are stopped (1). Of all patients with CDI, about 5%–10% are candidates to consider microbiome replacement therapies such as FMT. Once a patient is deemed to truly have multiply recurrent CDI, the first step is to initiate oral vancomycin therapy to treat acute diarrhea and assess response. The time to resolution of diarrhea is typically 4–5 days. Once diarrhea resolves (which happens in over 95% patients while on vancomycin), vancomycin should be tapered to the lowest effective dose, which is typically 125 mg once a day or once every other day. A commonly used taper regimen is vancomycin 125 mg 4 times a day for 2 weeks, followed by twice a day for 1 week, followed by once a day for a week and then every other day. An alternative to using vancomycin would be fidaxomicin, but its use for long-term use would be cost-prohibitive. In the COVID-19 era, FMT for these patients should be delayed until the pandemic is better controlled (Figure 1). In patients with fulminant CDI with no response to maximal guideline-based combination therapy, surgery or rescue FMT (may be considered even during the ongoing pandemic) are options. As this pandemic progress, access to FMT will become scarce because of the nonavailability of the stool banked before December 2019, lack of guidance, and availability of validated tests for the donor stool COVID-19 screening. If FMT is a needed treatment, consider using the banked stool with donations before December 2019. An alternate approach would be to screen a household contact (with usual donor screening performed before COVID-19) because the COVID-19 status of household contacts will be similar because of high contagiousness of this coronavirus. A third approach would be to screen a potential recipient for COVID-19 status (with symptoms, travel history, and testing if a test is readily available), and if a recipient is positive, any otherwise well-screened donor may be used. If the recipient is negative for coronavirus, and FMT is a life-saving procedure (surgery is not an option), then banked stool before December 2019, or stool from a coronavirus-negative donor should be used (Figure 2).
Figure 1.

Treatment algorithm for recurrent and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection in the era of COVID-19.

Treatment algorithm for recurrent and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection in the era of COVID-19. An algorithm for donor screening and stool banking for fecal microbiota transplantation. If the COVID-19 pandemic persists and the novel coronavirus becomes a population-wide pathogen, in future both donors and recipients would need to be tested and matched for COVID-19 status. The future of microbiome replacement therapies include stool treated to remove viruses and bacterial pathogens and synthetically grown defined microbial consortia to avoid the risk of transmitting pathogens, including the novel coronavirus.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Guarantor of the article: Sahil Khanna, MBBS, MS. Specific author contributions: S.K. wrote the manuscript and D.S.P. reviewed the manuscript. Financial support: None to report. Potential competing interests: S.K.: research grants from Rebiotix, Inc. (A Ferring company), consulting fees from Shire Plc, Premier Inc., Facile therapeutics, ProbioTech Inc., outside of the submitted work. D.S.P.: research grants from Vedanta, Seres therapeutics, consulting fees from Assembly Biosciences, Inc.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; Merck & Co, Inc.; C3J Therapeutics, Inc.; Nestlé; and Salix Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work.
  10 in total

1.  Faecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection using long-term frozen stool is effective: clinical efficacy and bacterial viability data.

Authors:  S P Costello; M A Conlon; M S Vuaran; I C Roberts-Thomson; J M Andrews
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection.

Authors:  Arjun Gupta; Adam S Cifu; Sahil Khanna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Frozen vs Fresh Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Clinical Resolution of Diarrhea in Patients With Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Christine H Lee; Theodore Steiner; Elaine O Petrof; Marek Smieja; Diane Roscoe; Anouf Nematallah; J Scott Weese; Stephen Collins; Paul Moayyedi; Mark Crowther; Mark J Ropeleski; Padman Jayaratne; David Higgins; Yingfu Li; Neil V Rau; Peter T Kim
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Repeat Clostridium difficile Testing.

Authors:  Arjun Gupta; Sahil Khanna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.

Authors:  Zain Kassam; Nancy Dubois; Bharat Ramakrishna; Kelly Ling; Taha Qazi; Mark Smith; Colleen R Kelly; Monika Fischer; Jessica R Allegretti; Shrish Budree; Pratik Panchal; Ciarán P Kelly; Majdi Osman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Dawei Wang; Bo Hu; Chang Hu; Fangfang Zhu; Xing Liu; Jing Zhang; Binbin Wang; Hui Xiang; Zhenshun Cheng; Yong Xiong; Yan Zhao; Yirong Li; Xinghuan Wang; Zhiyong Peng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Johan S Bakken; Karen C Carroll; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Kevin W Garey; Carolyn V Gould; Ciaran Kelly; Vivian Loo; Julia Shaklee Sammons; Thomas J Sandora; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Drug-Resistant E. coli Bacteremia Transmitted by Fecal Microbiota Transplant.

Authors:  Zachariah DeFilipp; Patricia P Bloom; Mariam Torres Soto; Michael K Mansour; Mohamad R A Sater; Miriam H Huntley; Sarah Turbett; Raymond T Chung; Yi-Bin Chen; Elizabeth L Hohmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammarota; Gianluca Ianiro; Colleen R Kelly; Benjamin H Mullish; Jessica R Allegretti; Zain Kassam; Lorenza Putignani; Monika Fischer; Josbert J Keller; Samuel Paul Costello; Harry Sokol; Patrizia Kump; Reetta Satokari; Stacy A Kahn; Dina Kao; Perttu Arkkila; Ed J Kuijper; Maria J Gt Vehreschild; Cristina Pintus; Loris Lopetuso; Luca Masucci; Franco Scaldaferri; E M Terveer; Max Nieuwdorp; Antonio López-Sanromán; Juozas Kupcinskas; Ailsa Hart; Herbert Tilg; Antonio Gasbarrini
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples.

Authors:  Yongjian Wu; Cheng Guo; Lantian Tang; Zhongsi Hong; Jianhui Zhou; Xin Dong; Huan Yin; Qiang Xiao; Yanping Tang; Xiujuan Qu; Liangjian Kuang; Xiaomin Fang; Nischay Mishra; Jiahai Lu; Hong Shan; Guanmin Jiang; Xi Huang
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-03-20
  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Korea.

Authors:  Tae-Geun Gweon; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyeong Ok Kim; Sung Kyun Yim; Jae Seung Soh; Seung Young Kim; Jae Jun Park; Seung Yong Shin; Tae Hee Lee; Chang Hwan Choi; Young-Seok Cho; Dongeun Yong; Jin-Won Chung; Kwang Jae Lee; Oh Young Lee; Myung-Gyu Choi; Miyoung Choi
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.924

2.  Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Is Effective for the Treatment of Partially Treated Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Authors:  Young-Seok Cho
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  The interplay of SARS-CoV-2 and Clostridioides difficile infection.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Colleen S Kraft
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 4.  Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile, safety, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Avnish Sandhu; Teena Chopra
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Clostridioides difficile infection: curbing a difficult menace.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Ryan Pardi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.802

6.  Manufacturing Process of SER-109, a Purified Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic, Reduces Risk of Coronavirus Transmission From Donor Stool.

Authors:  Christopher McChalicher; Ahmad Abdulaziz; S Steve Zhou; Mary-Jane Lombardo; Brooke Hasson; John G Auniņš; Barbara H McGovern; David S Ege
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.423

Review 7.  Twelve Months with COVID-19: What Gastroenterologists Need to Know.

Authors:  Giulia Concas; Michele Barone; Ruggiero Francavilla; Fernanda Cristofori; Vanessa Nadia Dargenio; Rossella Giorgio; Costantino Dargenio; Vassilios Fanos; Maria Antonietta Marcialis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Implementation of fecal microbiota transplantation in a medical center for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and report of preliminary outcome.

Authors:  Yuan-Ming Yeh; Hao-Tsai Cheng; Puo-Hsien Le; Chien-Chang Chen; Chia-Jung Kuo; Chyi-Liang Chen; Cheng-Tang Chiu; Cheng-Hsun Chiu
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.