| Literature DB >> 32617491 |
Mustapha El Hamriti1, Leonard Bergau1, Philipp Sommer1, Christian Sohns1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac tamponade is one of the most serious complications when performing cardiac interventions. Although most of the patients can be treated effectively using pericardiocentesis, urgent surgery can be necessary in case of continuous bleeding and patients' haemodynamic impairment. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cardiac tamponade; Case report; Cryoballoon; Persistent left superior vena cava
Year: 2020 PMID: 32617491 PMCID: PMC7319836 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J Case Rep ISSN: 2514-2119
Figure 5Angiography of the cryoballoon in a wedge position (left anterior oblique 40° projection). The inflated balloon device was placed at this position for 45 min. CB, cryoballoon; CS, coronary sinus; FCS, FlexCath sheath; PC, pigtail catheter; PLSCV, persistent left superior vena cava; TSP, transseptal puncture site.
| First diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) | March 2016 |
| Diagnosis of persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) from preprocedural imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. | June 2019 |
| The patient with history of a PLSVC admitted for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation due to drug-refractory symptomatic paroxysmal AF. | At presentation |
| Cryoballoon (CB)-guided PV isolation was successfully performed. Perforation of the coronary sinus ostium at the transseptal puncture site resulted in a severe post-procedural pericardial tamponade. Acute endovascular occlusion of the perforation site using the inflated CB was performed as a bridge definitive haemostasis. | During procedure 05 June 2019 |
| No evidence for further pericardial effusion. | Day 1 after the ablation procedure |
| Hospital discharge without any sequelae related to the ablation procedure. | Day 2 following the ablation procedure |
| Until today no arrhythmia recurrence has been reported. | Follow-up data |