| Literature DB >> 32617301 |
Zhengqiang Li1, Xuebin Zhang1, Zhaowei Li2, Aqin Peng1, Lichuang Zhang1, Yingying Deng1, Lianxin Song1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare the clinical effect of short dynamic hip screw (DHS) combined with fibula bone graft and short DHS combined with cannulated screws (CS) on the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults.Entities:
Keywords: Femoral neck fracture; cannulated screws (CS); dynamic hip screw (DHS); fibula bone graft; young adults
Year: 2020 PMID: 32617301 PMCID: PMC7327311 DOI: 10.21037/atm-19-3344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Demographics and characteristics of patients
| Group | Group A (n=18, %) | Group B (n=17, %) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year, mean ± SD) | 44.17±10.80 | 45.12±14.22 |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 5 (27.78%) | 8 (47.06%) |
| Male | 13 (72.22%) | 9 (52.94%) |
| Injury mechanism | ||
| Fall injury | 7 (38.89%) | 10 (58.82%) |
| Traffic accident injuries | 11 (61.11%) | 7 (41.18%) |
| Side | ||
| Left | 9 (50.00%) | 7 (41.18%) |
| Right | 9 (50.00%) | 10 (58.82%) |
| Garden type | ||
| Type III | 10 (55.56%) | 13 (76.47%) |
| Type IV (with comminuted posterior wall) | 8 (44.44%) | 4 (23.53%) |
| Time from injury to surgery (D, mean ± SD) | 6.68±5.00 | 5.59±2.92 |
Comparison of general condition in two groups (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Operation time (h) | Intraoperative blood loss (mL) | Fracture healing time (min) | Harris score | Preoperative VAS score | Postoperative VAS score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A (n=18) | 3.25±1.23 | 372.22±244.48 | 5.28±1.07 | 95.44±2.57 | 6.83±1.09 | 3.22±0.81 |
| Group B (n=17) | 3.18±1.18 | 358.82±308.84 | 7.31±1.65 | 87.82±7.79 | 6.52±1.12 | 3.12±0.86 |
| t | 0.194 | 0.143 | −4.15 | 3.93 | 0.809 | 0.371 |
| P | 0.848 | 0.887 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.424 | 0.713 |
VAS, visual analogue scale.
Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups
| Group | Fracture nonunion (n, %) | Femoral head necrosis (n, %) | Nail removal (n, %) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A (n=18) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Group B (n=17) | 4 (23.5) | 4 (23.5) | 6 (35.3) |
| χ2 | 4.78 | 4.78 | 7.68 |
| P | 0.029 | 0.029 | 0.006 |
Figure 1A 40-year-old female patient with right femoral neck fracture was treated with DHS combined with fibula bone grafting. (A,B) Preoperative positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed a fracture of the right femoral neck; (C,D) postoperative positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed the internal fixator was present and well positioned; (E,F) 4 months after the operation, positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed that the fracture had healed and the internal fixation was good; (G,H,I,J,K) 8 months after the operation, positive, lateral X-ray and CT of the hip joint showed that the fracture has healed and the internal fixation is good; (L,M) 15 months after the operation, positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed that the fracture has healed and the internal fixation is good.
Figure 2A 40-year-old male patient with left femoral neck fracture was treated with DHS combined with fibula bone grafting. (A,B) Preoperative positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed a fracture of the left femoral neck; (C,D) postoperative positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed the internal fixator was present; (E,F) 6 months after the operation, positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed that the fracture had healed and the internal fixation was present and good; (G,H) 14 months after the operation, positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed that the fracture had healed and the internal fixation was present and good; (I,J) 14 months after the operation, positive and lateral X-ray of the hip joint showed that the fracture had healed and the internal fixation was removed. Then the fibula implant is in a good position and does not break; (K,L,M) the general image before removal of the internal fixator showed no shortening of the affected limb and no obstruction of squat.