| Literature DB >> 32617257 |
Xuan Wang1, Jia-Hui Cheng1, Ling-Hong Zhou1, Jun-Hao Zhu2, Rui-Ying Wang1, Hua-Zhen Zhao1, Ying-Kui Jiang1, Li-Ping Huang1, Ching-Wan Yip1, Chun-Xing Que1, Min Zhu2, Li-Ping Zhu1.
Abstract
Cryptococcosis is one of the most common opportunistic infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Although the cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) lateral flow assay (LFA) has been widely used in clinical settings due to its high sensitivity and specificity, the diagnostic value of a low CrAg LFA titers remains unclear. In this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of 149 HIV-negative patients with low CrAg LFA titers (≤1:10) in a Chinese tertiary hospital from January 2013 to December 2017, to evaluate the diagnostic value of low CrAg LFA titers in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at different thresholds. Sensitivity and specificity of low CrAg LFA titers in patients with definitive diagnoses of cryptococcosis were 39.6% (95% CI, 29.7-50.1%) and 100% (95% CI, 69.2-100%), respectively, at a threshold of 1:10 in serum. A sensitivity of 72.9% (95% CI, 62.9-81.5%) and a decreased specificity of 70.0% (95% CI, 34.8-93.3%) were observed at a threshold of 1:5 in serum. No false-positive cases were identified in patients with low CrAg titers in CSF and all positive predictive values (PPVs) were 100%. Among the cases with low serum CrAg titers, lumbar puncture was performed in 97 patients and positive CSF CrAg titers were reported in 6 patients. In conclusion, the results of this study imply that low CrAg LFA titer, either in serum or CSF, is crucial for early diagnosis of cryptococcosis in HIV-negative patients, and lumbar puncture is recommended to be performed routinely for CSF testing when a positive low serum titer is reported. Cryptococcal meningitis should be considered seriously when the CSF CrAg titer is positive.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptococcosis; Diagnostic accuracy; Lateral flow assay; Low cryptococcal antigen titer; Meningitis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32617257 PMCID: PMC7325107 DOI: 10.1186/s43008-020-00028-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IMA Fungus ISSN: 2210-6340 Impact factor: 3.515
Fig. 1Flow-chart to show individuals included and excluded from the study. a Three of the 149 patients were tested of low CrAg LFA titers in both serum and CSF, resulting in 152 samples included. Abbreviations: CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Basic characteristics of patients with low CrAg LFA results
| Variables | Patients with CrAg titers of 1:10 ( | Patients with CrAg titers of 1:5 ( | Patients with CrAg titers of 1:2 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median year (range) | 51 (21–74) | 51 (24–84) | 52.5 (20–88) |
| Sex, Female | 13 (25.5) | 22 (46.8) | 22 (40.7) |
| Predisposing factorsa | 15 (29.4) | 18 (38.3) | 23 (42.6) |
| Autoimmune diseases | 5 (9.8) | 7 (14.9) | 8 (14.8) |
| Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants administrations | 7 (13.7) | 5 (10.6) | 10 (18.5) |
| Haematological malignancy | 3 (5.9) | 3 (6.4) | 3 (5.6) |
| Lung cancer | 2 (3.9) | 2 (4.3) | 3 (5.6) |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.1) | 3 (5.6) |
| Decompensated liver cirrhosis | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.1) | 1 (2.1) |
| Signs and symptoms | |||
| Cough | 21 (41.2) | 16 (34.0) | 17 (31.5) |
| Shortness | 1 (2.0) | 1 (2.1) | 2 (3.7) |
| Haemoptysis | 2 (3.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) |
| Chest pain | 9 (17.6) | 4 (8.5) | 5 (9.3) |
| Fever | 7 (13.7) | 6 (12.8) | 8 (14.8) |
| Headache or dizziness | 6 (11.8) | 3 (6.4) | 6 (11.1) |
| Fatigue | 1 (1.9) | 5 (10.6) | 2 (3.7) |
| Abdominal distention | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.1) | 0 (0.0) |
| Diagnosisb | |||
| Proven | 12 (23.5) | 10 (21.3) | 7 (13.0) |
| Probable | 32 (62.7) | 24 (51.1) | 23 (42.6) |
| Possible | 7 (13.7) | 10 (21.3) | 17 (31.5) |
| Non-cryptococcosis | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.4) | 7 (13.0) |
Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated
Abbreviations: LFA lateral flow assay; CrAg cryptococcal antigen; CSF cerebrospinal fluid; NS no significant
aTwo of the 54 patients with predisposing factors were tested of low CrAg LFA titers in both serum and CSF
bThree patients were tested of low CrAg LFA titers in both serum and CSF. Patient 1 with a CrAg titer of 1:5 in serum and 1:10 in CSF was diagnosed as proven pulmonary cryptococcosis along with proven cryptococcal meningitis. Patient 2 with CrAg titer of 1:5 in serum and 1:10 in CSF was diagnosed as probable pulmonary cryptococcosis along with proven cryptococcal meningitis. Patient 3 with CrAg titer of 1:5 in serum and 1:2 in CSF was diagnosed as possible cryptococcal infection in both lung and CNS
Review of patients with proven and probable cryptococcosis
| Pulmonary Cryptococcosis | Cryptococcal Meningitis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proven | Probable | Provena | Probable | |
| 1:10 | 8 (33.3%) | 30 (41.7%) | 4 (80.0%) | 2 (28.6%) |
| 1:5 | 10 (41.7%) | 22 (30.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (28.6%) |
| 1:2 | 6 (25.0%) | 20 (27.8%) | 1 (20.0%) | 3 (42.9%) |
| Total | 24 | 72 | 5 | 7 |
Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated
aTwo proven cryptococcal meningitis patients with CSF titer of 1:10 and serum titer of 1:5 were concurrently diagnosed as proven and probable pulmonary cryptococcosis, respectively
Fig. 2Heat map of patients with cryptococcosis and CrAg titers. A. Heat map of patients with cryptococcosis and CrAg titers in serum. B. Heat map of patients with cryptococcosis and CrAg titers in CSF. The proportion of patients with cryptococcosis in each diagnostic classification and the corresponding CrAg titer value in serum or CSF are illustrated. The intensity of the red color increases with of greater proportion of patients falling with corresponding CrAg titer and diagnostic classifications. Abbreviations: CrAg, cryptococcal antigen; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Diagnostic accuracy of different low CrAg LFA titers in patients with different immune status
| Threshold | Value % (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Specificitya | PPV | NPV | |
| Serum | ||||
| = 1:10 | 39.6 (29.7–50.1) | 100.0 (69.2–100.0) | 100.0 (90.7–100.0) | 14.7 (7.3–25.4) |
| With predisposing factors | 33.3 (16.5–54.0) | 100.0 (54.1–100.0) | 100.0 (66.4–100.0) | 25.0 (9.8–46.7) |
| Without predisposing factors | 42.0 (30.2–54.5) | 100.0 (39.8–100.0) | 100.0 (88.1–100.0) | 9.1 (2.5–21.7) |
| ≥ 1:5 | 72.9 (62.9–81.5) | 70.0 (34.8–93.3) | 95.9 (88.5–99.1) | 21.2 (9.0–38.9) |
| With predisposing factors | 70.4 (49.8–86.2) | 66.7 (22.2–95.7) | 90.5 (69.6–98.8) | 33.3 (9.9–65.1) |
| Without predisposing factors | 73.9 (61.9–83.7) | 75.0 (19.4–99.4) | 98.1 (89.7–100.0) | 14.3 (3.0–36.3) |
| CSF | ||||
| = 1:10 | 50.0 (21.1–78.9) | / | 100.0 (54.1–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–45.9) |
| With predisposing factors | 33.3 (4.3–77.7) | / | 100.0 (15.8–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–60.2) |
| Without predisposing factors | 66.7 (22.3–95.7) | / | 100.0 (39.8–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–84.2) |
| ≥ 1:5 | 66.7 (34.9–90.1) | / | 100.0 (63.1–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–60.2) |
| With predisposing factors | 50.0 (11.8–88.2) | / | 100.0 (29.2–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–70.8) |
| Without predisposing factors | 83.3 (35.9–99.6) | / | 100.0 (47.8–100.0) | 0.0 (0.0–97.5) |
Data are presented as % (95% confidence interval)
Abbreviations: CI confidence interval; NPV negative predictive value; PPV positive predictive value; LFA lateral flow assay; CrAg cryptococcal antigen; CSF cerebrospinal fluid
aSpecificity was not calculated because no false positive case was found in patients with low CrAg LFA titer in CSF