Literature DB >> 32617198

Unified Open Hardware Platform for Digital X-Ray Devices; its Conceptual Model and First Implementation.

F Aytac Durmaz1,2,3, Altay Brusan1,2, Cengizhan Ozturk1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital radiography devices are still the gold standard for diagnosis or therapy guidance in medicine. Despite the similarities between all direct digital x-ray systems, researchers and new companies face significant challenges during the development phase of innovative x-ray devices; each component is manufactured independently, guidance towards device integration from manufacturers is limited, global standards for device integration is lacking.
METHOD: In scope of this study a plug-integrate-play (PIP) conceptual model for x-ray imaging system is introduced and implemented as an open hardware platform, SyncBox. The researchers are free to select each individual device component from different vendors based on their intended application and target performance are utilized in criteria. RESULT: As its first implementation, SyncBox and its platform a full body high resolution radiographic scanner that employs a novel TDI digital detector.
CONCLUSION: We believe that SyncBox has a potential for introducing an open source hardware platform to x-ray equipment design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical imaging; open source hardware; plug-integrate-play (PIP) medical device development; x-ray applications; x-ray imaging hardware

Year:  2020        PMID: 32617198      PMCID: PMC7326152          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2020.3000011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  17 in total

1.  New IEEE 11073 Standards for interoperable, networked Point-of-Care Medical Devices.

Authors:  Martin Kasparick; Stefan Schlichting; Frank Golatowski; Dirk Timmermann
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

2.  Medical device interoperability and the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative.

Authors:  John G Rhoads; Todd Cooper; Ken Fuchs; Paul Schluter; Raymond Peter Zambuto
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2010

Review 3.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Solving the interoperability challenge: safe and reliable information exchange requires more from product designers.

Authors:  Julian M Goldman
Journal:  IEEE Pulse       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.924

5.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for digital radiography.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Thomas G Ruckdeschel; Michael J Flynn; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; A Kyle Jones; Elizabeth Krupinski; J Anthony Seibert; S Jeff Shepard; Alisa Walz-Flannigan; Tariq A Mian; Matthew S Pollack
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Review of Lodox Statscan in the detection of peripheral skeletal fractures in multiple injury patients.

Authors:  S Deyle; T Brehmer; D S Evangelopoulos; F Krause; L M Benneker; H Zimmermann; A K Exadaktylos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  iBEX: Modular Open-Source Software for Digital Radiography.

Authors:  Altay Brusan; F Aytaç Durmaz; Alper Yaman; Cengizhan Öztürk
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.

Authors:  R Mooney; P S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Open-source hardware for medical devices.

Authors:  Gerrit Niezen; Parisa Eslambolchilar; Harold Thimbleby
Journal:  BMJ Innov       Date:  2016-03-14

Review 10.  Justification of radiographic examinations: What are the key issues?

Authors:  Jason Vom; Imelda Williams
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2017-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.