| Literature DB >> 32616835 |
Saeideh Ramezani Akbarabadi1, Hamid Rahimpour Soleimani2, Zahra Golsanamlou2, Maysam Bagheri Tagani2.
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) and the non-equilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formalism in the linear response regime were employed to investigate the impact of doping on the electronic and phononic transport properties in anEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32616835 PMCID: PMC7331582 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67964-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) The device model of the anthracene molecule sandwiched between ZGNR leads. The edge carbon atoms of the anthracene molecule are substituted by (b) NB, (c) N, or (d) B atoms. Various parts of the sample and their corresponding dimension are indicated at the bottom of the figure.
Figure 2Logarithm of the transmission coefficient of the anthracene molecule sandwiched between ZGNR leads versus energy in the non-doped and doped (with B, N or NB atoms) molecular junctions. Logarithm of the transmission coefficient is plotted with a higher resolution for the (b) non-doped, (c) B-doped, (d) N-doped and (e) NB-doped molecular junctions. The arrows and labels indicate molecular orbitals (HOMO or LUMO) contributing to the transmission coefficient.
Figure 4(Top) Calculated HOMO and LUMO orbitals of the () non-doped, () NB-doped, () N-doped, and () B-doped anthracene. (Bottom) The isosurface diagrams of the projected self-consistent Hamiltonian eigenstates for the () non-doped, () NB-doped, () N-doped, and () B-doped anthracene. The isovalue of each molecular orbital surface is .
Figure 3(a) Band structure of the left (left) and right electrodes (right), and the transmission coefficient of the non-doped and doped (with B, N or NB atoms) anthracene molecule sandwiched between ZGNR leads versus energy (middle). The transmission coefficient is shown separately (with a higher resolution) for the (b) non-doped, (c) B-doped, (d) N-doped and (e) NB-doped molecular junctions. The arrows and labels indicate molecular orbitals (HOMO or LUMO) contributing to the transmission coefficient.
Figure 5Temperature dependence of thermoelectric transport coefficients: (a) electrical conductance, (b) electron thermal conductance, and (c) thermopower. (d) Electronic contribution of the figure of merit in the anthracene molecule sandwiched between ZGNR leads in the non-doped and doped (with B, N or NB atoms) molecular junctions. The arrows and labels above each panel indicate the y-axis (left or right) in which the thermoelectric coefficients are plotted for each molecular junction.
Figure 6The phonon transmission coefficient of the anthracene molecule sandwiched between ZGNR leads versus phonon energy in the non-doped and doped (with B, N or NB atoms) molecular junctions.
Figure 7Temperature dependence of the phononic thermal conductance. The inset shows the ratio of phonon and electron thermal conductances ().
Figure 8Temperature dependence of the total figure of merit for the B-doped, N-doped (left y-axis), NB-doped and non-doped (right y-axis) molecular junctions which consists of both the electronic and phononic linear response transport coefficients.