Literature DB >> 32615112

New approaches to cancer care in a COVID-19 world.

John Butler1, Christian Finley2, Charles H Norell3, Samantha Harrison4, Heather Bryant5, Michael P Achiam6, Alon D Altman7, Nancy Baxter8, James Bentley9, Paul A Cohen10, M Asif Chaudry11, Elijah Dixon12, Rhonda Farrell13, Scott Fegan14, Salila Hashmi12, Claus Hogdall15, John T Jenkins16, Janice Kwon17, Tom Mala18, Orla McNally19, Neil Merrett20, Gregg Nelson21, Andy Nordin22, Jason Park23, Geoff Porter24, John Reynolds25, Colin Schieman26, Tine Schnack15, Allan Spigelman27, Lars Bo Svendsen6, Peter Sykes28, Robert Thomas29.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32615112      PMCID: PMC7324090          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30340-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


× No keyword cloud information.
The effects of COVID-19 on cancer are substantial, highlighting both novel and existing challenges for health-care systems. We were therefore encouraged to see The Lancet Oncology's call for cancer care to be safeguarded in a post-COVID-19 world. We endorse this position for cancer surgery specifically, and propose several recommendations aiming to reduce the so-called collateral damage of COVID-19. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a global collaboration seeking to compare and improve cancer survival across high-income countries. Within the ICBP, we came together to provide a voice for the international cancer surgery community. Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, made acutely worse by the COVID-19 pandemic, and requires sustained investment and coordinated planning in a COVID-19 world. Health leaders now need to safeguard capacity and regain lost progress in cancer control. Available resources should be directed to those most likely to benefit. National media campaigns should be used to boost screening uptake and help-seeking behaviour for potential cancer symptoms, addressing the current delays and barriers in access to health care. Investment in cancer diagnostic workforces will be key, particularly in building up provisions for tests and biopsy procedures and shortening diagnosis-to-treatment intervals. The pandemic has also created opportunities to improve efficiencies in care, such as virtual consultations and visits. Facilitating multidisciplinary team meetings digitally is one of many potential changes requiring long-term investment in technology and infrastructure. Cancer surgery services need to be well prepared as we navigate through the COVID-19 era. Substantial reconfigurations will be required to deal with heightened caseloads. Together with other time-sensitive and life-threatening procedures, cancer surgery should be prioritised over less urgent operations. Increased theatre space availability, surgeon capacity, and postoperative surveillance resources will be required. More frequent and widespread testing is needed to ensure relatively COVID-19-free hospitals or designated Cancer Hubs that are safe for patients and staff. More acute-care nurses should be recruited to manage more patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery services is recommended to match increased surgical volumes. Expansions in the capacity of intensive care units must remain in place while services manage an unprecedented number of patients with cancer coming back into the system. Capturing real-time data will be crucial to benchmark hospital performance and inform rapid quality improvement as centres grapple with the new reality of a post-COVID-19 world. We must also prepare for consecutive waves of outbreaks, with the need to restrict services for uncertain periods of time. Finally, efforts to benchmark cancer outcomes internationally and regionally are now essential to better understand the global impacts of COVID-19 on cancer care and enable countries to share knowledge on best practice during pandemics in future. To support cancer surgery services, we propose several recommendations (panel ). These recommendations should inform policies to deal with a new cancer burden in a post-COVID-19 environment and to mitigate a potential crisis in excess deaths due to cancer. Countries and regions will be affected in different ways and should prioritise these recommendations on the basis of their own resources and planning. Run media campaigns to boost screening uptake and encourage patients to seek help for potential cancer symptoms Resume evidence-based screening programmes and other early diagnosis initiatives as soon as possible Implement risk stratification tools and effective triage assessments to account for restricted diagnostic capacity and to prioritise patients with concerning symptoms or requiring staging over those in follow-up Mitigate the risks of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection, including testing all patients admitted for major cancer surgery and by using relatively COVID-19-free institutions (designated stand-alone diagnostic and treatment facilities) or isolating within sites Investing in technology and infrastructure to facilitate virtual consultations, multidisciplinary team meetings, and other innovations Prioritise cancer surgery over elective and less urgent operations, and among these cancer cases, prioritise patients according to urgency of surgical care and patient benefit Anticipate increased volumes of cancer surgery with appropriate workforce and resource planning in a slower throughput environment, including theatre space, surgeon capacity, and postoperative surveillance resources, potentially to levels higher than before COVID-19 Maintain increased levels of intensive care unit capacity and standards to ensure prioritisation of patients with cancer and other time critical and life-threatening conditions Adopt evidence-based perioperative pathways such as enhanced recovery after surgery to improve recovery of patients with cancer after surgery, allowing for increased throughput of patients and capacity of the health-care system Capture data and track of the number of cases, patient stage, and treatment in real-time to benchmark performance and respond to system stresses Support cancer health-care teams and administrative staff to minimise and respond to burnout Prepare and plan for subsequent waves of COVID-19 and other pandemics to reduce future effects on cancer care Benchmark international and regional cancer outcomes in the new context of COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
  7 in total

1.  Differences in Emotional Distress Among Black and White Breast Cancer Survivors During the Covid-19 Pandemic: a National Survey.

Authors:  Tamara Hamlish; Elizabeth Lerner Papautsky
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2021-02-23

2.  Practices and experiences of European frontline nurses under the shadow of COVID-19.

Authors:  Semyon Melnikov; Ilya Kagan; Helena Felizardo; Marion Lynch; Charlotte Jakab-Hall; Lisa Langan; Peter Vermeir; Marie-Louise Luiking-Martin
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 3.  Cancerona: Challenges of Cancer Management in Times of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Farah Ballout; Reem Daouk; Joseph Azar; Michael Timonian; Tarek Araji; Hisham F Bahmad; Wassim Abou-Kheir
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  Unequal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric cancer care: a population-based cohort study in China.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Fang Liu; Yao He; Xiaochen Dai; Zhenhui Liu; Weiyan Jian; Joseph M Unger
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Where Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols Meet the Three Major Current Pandemics: COVID-19, Obesity and Malignancy.

Authors:  Anastasia Prodromidou; Aristotelis-Marios Koulakmanidis; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Gregg Nelson; Alexandros Rodolakis; Nikolaos Thomakos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Oncological Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Effectiveness of Preoperative Screening and Factors Associated with Postoperative SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  André Lopes; Caroline B P Pastore; Paula Deckers; Izabela K M W Halla; Ana Luiza Rezende Dias; Marcos Vinicius Maia da Mata; Adriana do Nascimento Martins; Micaela Mazutti Viu; Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez; Alayne Domingues Yamada
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.339

7.  Oncology provider experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hannah Arem; Jenna Moses; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Maureen Killackey; Beth Sieloff; Cindy Cisneros; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.