John Butler1, Christian Finley2, Charles H Norell3, Samantha Harrison4, Heather Bryant5, Michael P Achiam6, Alon D Altman7, Nancy Baxter8, James Bentley9, Paul A Cohen10, M Asif Chaudry11, Elijah Dixon12, Rhonda Farrell13, Scott Fegan14, Salila Hashmi12, Claus Hogdall15, John T Jenkins16, Janice Kwon17, Tom Mala18, Orla McNally19, Neil Merrett20, Gregg Nelson21, Andy Nordin22, Jason Park23, Geoff Porter24, John Reynolds25, Colin Schieman26, Tine Schnack15, Allan Spigelman27, Lars Bo Svendsen6, Peter Sykes28, Robert Thomas29. 1. Department of Gynecological Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, London, E20 1JQ, UK. 2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, London, E20 1JQ, UK. Electronic address: charles.norell@cancer.org.uk. 4. Policy & Information, Cancer Research UK, London, E20 1JQ, UK. 5. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 8. Department of Surgery and LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 10. Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, St John of God Subiaco Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia. 11. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 12. Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 13. Gynaecological Oncology Department, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 14. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK. 15. Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 16. Department of Surgery, St. Mark's Hospital, Middlesex, UK. 17. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 18. Department of Gastrointestinal and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 19. Oncology and Dysplasia Service, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 20. Faculty of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 21. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 22. East Kent Gynaecological Centre, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK. 23. Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 24. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 25. Department of Surgery, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 26. Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 27. St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 28. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand. 29. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The effects of COVID-19 on cancer are substantial, highlighting both novel and existing challenges for health-care systems. We were therefore encouraged to see The Lancet Oncology's call for cancer care to be safeguarded in a post-COVID-19 world. We endorse this position for cancer surgery specifically, and propose several recommendations aiming to reduce the so-called collateral damage of COVID-19. The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a global collaboration seeking to compare and improve cancer survival across high-income countries. Within the ICBP, we came together to provide a voice for the international cancer surgery community.Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, made acutely worse by the COVID-19 pandemic, and requires sustained investment and coordinated planning in a COVID-19 world. Health leaders now need to safeguard capacity and regain lost progress in cancer control. Available resources should be directed to those most likely to benefit. National media campaigns should be used to boost screening uptake and help-seeking behaviour for potential cancer symptoms, addressing the current delays and barriers in access to health care. Investment in cancer diagnostic workforces will be key, particularly in building up provisions for tests and biopsy procedures and shortening diagnosis-to-treatment intervals. The pandemic has also created opportunities to improve efficiencies in care, such as virtual consultations and visits. Facilitating multidisciplinary team meetings digitally is one of many potential changes requiring long-term investment in technology and infrastructure.Cancer surgery services need to be well prepared as we navigate through the COVID-19 era. Substantial reconfigurations will be required to deal with heightened caseloads. Together with other time-sensitive and life-threatening procedures, cancer surgery should be prioritised over less urgent operations. Increased theatre space availability, surgeon capacity, and postoperative surveillance resources will be required. More frequent and widespread testing is needed to ensure relatively COVID-19-free hospitals or designated Cancer Hubs that are safe for patients and staff. More acute-care nurses should be recruited to manage more patients preoperatively and postoperatively. The widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery services is recommended to match increased surgical volumes. Expansions in the capacity of intensive care units must remain in place while services manage an unprecedented number of patients with cancer coming back into the system.Capturing real-time data will be crucial to benchmark hospital performance and inform rapid quality improvement as centres grapple with the new reality of a post-COVID-19 world. We must also prepare for consecutive waves of outbreaks, with the need to restrict services for uncertain periods of time. Finally, efforts to benchmark cancer outcomes internationally and regionally are now essential to better understand the global impacts of COVID-19 on cancer care and enable countries to share knowledge on best practice during pandemics in future.To support cancer surgery services, we propose several recommendations (panel
). These recommendations should inform policies to deal with a new cancer burden in a post-COVID-19 environment and to mitigate a potential crisis in excess deaths due to cancer. Countries and regions will be affected in different ways and should prioritise these recommendations on the basis of their own resources and planning.Run media campaigns to boost screening uptake and encourage patients to seek help for potential cancer symptomsResume evidence-based screening programmes and other early diagnosis initiatives as soon as possibleImplement risk stratification tools and effective triage assessments to account for restricted diagnostic capacity and to prioritise patients with concerning symptoms or requiring staging over those in follow-upMitigate the risks of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection, including testing all patients admitted for major cancer surgery and by using relatively COVID-19-free institutions (designated stand-alone diagnostic and treatment facilities) or isolating within sitesInvesting in technology and infrastructure to facilitate virtual consultations, multidisciplinary team meetings, and other innovationsPrioritise cancer surgery over elective and less urgent operations, and among these cancer cases, prioritise patients according to urgency of surgical care and patient benefitAnticipate increased volumes of cancer surgery with appropriate workforce and resource planning in a slower throughput environment, including theatre space, surgeon capacity, and postoperative surveillance resources, potentially to levels higher than before COVID-19Maintain increased levels of intensive care unit capacity and standards to ensure prioritisation of patients with cancer and other time critical and life-threatening conditionsAdopt evidence-based perioperative pathways such as enhanced recovery after surgery to improve recovery of patients with cancer after surgery, allowing for increased throughput of patients and capacity of the health-care systemCapture data and track of the number of cases, patient stage, and treatment in real-time to benchmark performance and respond to system stressesSupport cancer health-care teams and administrative staff to minimise and respond to burnoutPrepare and plan for subsequent waves of COVID-19 and other pandemics to reduce future effects on cancer careBenchmark international and regional cancer outcomes in the new context of COVID-19SARS-CoV-2=severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Authors: Semyon Melnikov; Ilya Kagan; Helena Felizardo; Marion Lynch; Charlotte Jakab-Hall; Lisa Langan; Peter Vermeir; Marie-Louise Luiking-Martin Journal: Nurs Health Sci Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Farah Ballout; Reem Daouk; Joseph Azar; Michael Timonian; Tarek Araji; Hisham F Bahmad; Wassim Abou-Kheir Journal: SN Compr Clin Med Date: 2020-09-30
Authors: André Lopes; Caroline B P Pastore; Paula Deckers; Izabela K M W Halla; Ana Luiza Rezende Dias; Marcos Vinicius Maia da Mata; Adriana do Nascimento Martins; Micaela Mazutti Viu; Rossana Veronica Mendoza Lopez; Alayne Domingues Yamada Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-01-09 Impact factor: 4.339