Literature DB >> 32615109

Liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma after tumour downstaging (XXL): a randomised, controlled, phase 2b/3 trial.

Vincenzo Mazzaferro1, Davide Citterio2, Sherrie Bhoori2, Marco Bongini2, Rosalba Miceli3, Luciano De Carlis4, Michele Colledan5, Mauro Salizzoni6, Renato Romagnoli6, Barbara Antonelli7, Marco Vivarelli8, Giuseppe Tisone9, Massimo Rossi10, Salvatore Gruttadauria11, Stefano Di Sandro4, Riccardo De Carlis4, Maria Grazia Lucà5, Massimo De Giorgio5, Stefano Mirabella6, Luca Belli4, Stefano Fagiuoli5, Silvia Martini6, Massimo Iavarone12, Gianluca Svegliati Baroni8, Mario Angelico9, Stefano Ginanni Corradini10, Riccardo Volpes11, Luigi Mariani3, Enrico Regalia2, Maria Flores2, Michele Droz Dit Busset2, Carlo Sposito13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma are evolving and so-called expanded criteria remain debated. Locoregional therapies are able to downstage hepatocellular carcinoma from beyond to within the Milan criteria. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of liver transplantation after successful hepatocellular carcinoma downstaging.
METHODS: We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial designed in two phases, 2b and 3, at nine Italian tertiary care and transplantation centres. Patients aged 18-65 years with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria, absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, 5-year estimated post-transplantation survival of at least 50%, and good liver function (Child-Pugh A-B7) were recruited and underwent tumour downstaging with locoregional, surgical, or systemic therapies according to multidisciplinary decision. After an observation period of 3 months, during which sorafenib was allowed, patients with partial or complete responses according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive web-response system to liver transplantation or non-transplantation therapies (control group). A block randomisation (block size of 2), stratified by centre and compliance to sorafenib treatment, was applied. Liver transplantation was done with whole or split organs procured from brain-dead donors. The control group received sequences of locoregional and systemic treatment at the time of demonstrated tumour progression. The primary outcomes were 5-year tumour event-free survival for phase 2b and overall survival for phase 3. Analyses were by intention to treat. Organ allocation policy changed during the course of the study and restricted patient accrual to 4 years. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01387503.
FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2011, and March 31, 2015, 74 patients were enrolled. Median duration of downstaging was 6 months (IQR 4-11). 29 patients dropped out before randomisation and 45 were randomly assigned: 23 to the transplantation group versus 22 to the control group. At data cutoff on July 31, 2019, median follow-up was 71 months (IQR 60-85). 5-year tumour event-free survival was 76·8% (95% CI 60·8-96·9) in the transplantation group versus 18·3% (7·1-47·0) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·20, 95% CI 0·07-0·57; p=0·003). 5-year overall survival was 77·5% (95% CI 61·9-97·1) in the transplantation group versus 31·2% (16·6-58·5) in the control group (HR 0·32, 95% CI 0·11-0·92; p=0·035). The most common registered grade 3-4 serious adverse events were hepatitis C virus recurrence (three [13%] of 23 patients) and acute transplant rejection (two [9%]) in the transplantation group, and post-embolisation syndrome (two [9%] of 22 patients) in the control group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in four patients: two (8%) of 23 patients in the transplantation group (myocardial infarction and multi-organ failure) versus two (9%) of 22 patients in the control group (liver decompensation).
INTERPRETATION: Although results must be interpreted with caution owing to the early closing of the trial, after effective and sustained downstaging of eligible hepatocellular carcinomas beyond the Milan criteria, liver transplantation improved tumour event-free survival and overall survival compared with non-transplantation therapies Post-downstaging tumour response could contribute to the expansion of hepatocellular carcinoma transplantation criteria. FUNDING: Italian Ministry of Health.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32615109     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30224-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  40 in total

Review 1.  Non-immunotherapy options for the first-line management of hepatocellular carcinoma: exploring the evolving role of sorafenib and lenvatinib in advanced disease.

Authors:  S Perera; D Kelly; G M O'Kane
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Inter-center agreement of mRECIST in transplanted patients for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ilaria Vicentin; Cristina Mosconi; Enrico Garanzini; Carlo Sposito; Matteo Serenari; Vincenzo Buscemi; Martina Verna; Carlo Spreafico; Rita Golfieri; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Luciano De Carlis; Matteo Cescon; Giorgio Ercolani; Angelo Vanzulli; Alessandro Cucchetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Resection and transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  Daniel Seehofer; Robert Sucher; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  TARE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Right to the Left of BCLC.

Authors:  Boris Guiu; Etienne Garin; Carole Allimant; Julien Edeline; Riad Salem
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma as the Rose of Jericho: from the desert of sorafenib, to the blossoming of immunotherapy.

Authors:  Antonio D'Alessio; Lorenza Rimassa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 6.  Different Models to Predict the Risk of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Setting of Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Helena Degroote; Anja Geerts; Xavier Verhelst; Hans Van Vlierberghe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 7.  BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update.

Authors:  Maria Reig; Alejandro Forner; Jordi Rimola; Joana Ferrer-Fàbrega; Marta Burrel; Ángeles Garcia-Criado; Robin K Kelley; Peter R Galle; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Riad Salem; Bruno Sangro; Amit G Singal; Arndt Vogel; Josep Fuster; Carmen Ayuso; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 30.083

8.  Living donor liver transplantation or hepatic resection combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for Child-Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patient with Multifocal Tumours Meeting the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria.

Authors:  Xi Xu; Xingyu Pu; Li Jiang; Yang Huang; Lunan Yan; Jiayin Yang; Tianfu Wen; Bo Li; Hong Wu; Wentao Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Risk Score Model for Liver Transplant Outcomes after Preoperative Locoregional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti; Muhammad Hassan; Atif Rana; Nusrat Yar Khan; Zahid Amin Khan; Haseeb Haider Zia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-11-12

Review 10.  Combination therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: do we see the light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Ti Zhang; Philippe Merle; Huaqi Wang; Haitao Zhao; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 8.265

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.