Literature DB >> 32613475

ISCHEMIA questions and MITNEC answers: Defining and standardizing clinical ischemic jeopardy with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Erin M Armenia1, Ronald G Schwartz2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2020        PMID： 32613475     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-020-02237-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James E Udelson; Joni R Beshansky; Daniel S Ballin; James A Feldman; John L Griffith; Jonathan Handler; Gary V Heller; Robert C Hendel; J Hector Pope; Robin Ruthazer; Ethan J Spiegler; Robert H Woolard; Harry P Selker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prognostic value of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with elevated cardiac troponin I levels and atypical clinical presentation.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Robert P Giugliano; Giridhar Logsetty; Divya Vangala; Rakesh Mishra; Sharon Crugnale; David Yang; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures : Standardized reporting of nuclear cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Peter L Tilkemeier; Jamieson Bourque; Rami Doukky; Rupa Sanghani; Richard L Weinberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Coronary Microvascular Disease Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Alan Rozanski; Leslee J Shaw; Gregg W Stone; Louise E J Thomson; John D Friedman; Sean W Hayes; Ishac Cohen; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise thallium single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging in women.

Authors:  S B Pancholy; A A Fattah; A M Kamal; M Ghods; J Heo; A S Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Changes in myocardial perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after long-term, intense risk factor modification.

Authors:  K L Gould; D Ornish; L Scherwitz; S Brown; R P Edens; M J Hess; N Mullani; L Bolomey; F Dobbs; W T Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Filippo Crea
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.