Literature DB >> 32613430

Rethinking the post-COVID-19 pandemic hospital: more ICU beds or smart monitoring on the wards?

Frederic Michard1, Bernd Saugel2,3, Benoit Vallet4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613430      PMCID: PMC7327212          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06163-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, We read with interest the recent article by de Lange et al. entitled “ICU beds, less is more? No” [1]. We agree with the authors that the increasing number of vulnerable and elderly patients, of complex surgical procedures and of “just in case” ICU admissions for observation, may require a transformation of our hospitals. The COVID-19 crisis also revealed the limitations of our current structures to welcome a surge of acutely ill patients requiring hospitalization and close monitoring. However, although increasing the number of ICU beds is an option, we believe that upgrading monitoring methods on hospital wards may be part of the solution as well. Multiple wireless wearable sensors are now available to monitor vital signs non-invasively and continuously. They include adhesive patches, necklaces, and finger sensors to monitor heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, skin temperature, and/or changes in blood pressure [2]. They are increasingly used in surgical wards to detect postoperative complications at an early stage and tackle “failure to rescue” [3]. When nurses spot-check vital signs every 4–8 h, they miss a significant number of adverse events, including severe hypoxemic events [3]. Studies have shown that continuous monitoring of vital signs enables the immediate detection of clinical deterioration and, pending appropriate intervention, a decrease in cardiac arrest and ICU admission [2, 4]. During the COVID-19 crisis, a large number of patients requiring oxygen and at risk of rapid deterioration have been admitted at the same time. Several hospitals have therefore quickly equipped their wards with wireless pulse oximeters to cope with that surge. On hospital wards, the nurse/patient ratio is much lower than in ICUs and clinicians are not used to deal with life-threatening clinical situations. Therefore, we cannot envision to simply acquire existing ICU monitoring systems to install them on the wards. We have to implement systems specifically designed for the wards. Such systems are currently under development or evaluation. They usually include wearable sensors which are easy to set up (e.g., adhesive patch on the skin) and enable wireless monitoring, which, in the context of epidemics, has the advantage to decrease the number of physical interactions and the risk of contamination. Artifacts and false alarms, common in non-sedated patients, need to be filtered, and machine learning algorithms may help to achieve that goal [5]. Medical-grade connectivity protocols are necessary to prevent connectivity disruptions, common with classical Bluetooth connections. Smart algorithms are also needed to aggregate and fuse vital signs into a single early warning score or deterioration index so that nurses can only respond to “smart” alerts received at a central station or directly on their pager [4]. By doing so, one may envision the possibility to ask ward nurses to look after a large number of patients without increasing their workload [2]. Indeed, focusing on patients who are deteriorating, as soon as they do, should improve work efficiency. However, this remains to be confirmed by large clinical studies done in real-life conditions. Finally, to be useful, such remote monitoring systems need to direct the alert to the right person. For instance, if ward nurses could be informed first in case of mild deterioration, rapid response teams would need to be alerted directly in case of life-threatening clinical condition requiring immediate intervention. Therefore, in the hospital of the future, ICU beds could be reserved to patients requiring organ support such as mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy. Patients who would simply need close monitoring could safely stay on the wards and benefit from smart and continuous monitoring (Fig. 1). This strategy may help to improve patient safety and quality of hospital care without dramatically increasing the number of ICU beds and associated costs.
Fig. 1

On hospital wards, continuous monitoring of vital signs with wearable and wireless sensors may enable the early detection of clinical deterioration, timely intervention, and the prevention of severe adverse events such as cardiac arrest, ICU transfer, and death

On hospital wards, continuous monitoring of vital signs with wearable and wireless sensors may enable the early detection of clinical deterioration, timely intervention, and the prevention of severe adverse events such as cardiac arrest, ICU transfer, and death
  7 in total

1.  A novel art of continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  Jürgen Fortin; Dorothea E Rogge; Christian Fellner; Doris Flotzinger; Julian Grond; Katja Lerche; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Association between intrahospital transfer and hospital-acquired infection in the elderly: a retrospective case-control study in a UK hospital network.

Authors:  Emanuela Estera Boncea; Paul Expert; Kate Honeyford; Anne Kinderlerer; Colin Mitchell; Graham S Cooke; Luca Mercuri; Céire E Costelloe
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Critical care outreach during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study.

Authors:  Brigitta Fazzini; Simon Nourse; Ann McGinley
Journal:  Nurs Crit Care       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.897

4.  Experiences of current vital signs monitoring practices and views of wearable monitoring: A qualitative study in patients and nurses.

Authors:  Carlos Areia; Elizabeth King; Jody Ede; Louise Young; Lionel Tarassenko; Peter Watkinson; Sarah Vollam
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.057

5.  Indonesian Anesthesiologists Preparedness for COVID-19 Surge Capacity in the Early Pandemic.

Authors:  Mochamat Helmi; Djayanti Sari; Juni Kurniawaty; Calcarina Fr Wisudarti; Andreasta Meliala; Laksono Trisnantoro
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 6.  Strengthening the ICUs' human resource-related responses to Covid-19: A rapid review of the experience during the first year of public health emergency.

Authors:  Aizhan Tursunbayeva; Stefano Di Lauro
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 7.  How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care.

Authors:  Yaseen M Arabi; Elie Azoulay; Hasan M Al-Dorzi; Jason Phua; Jorge Salluh; Alexandra Binnie; Carol Hodgson; Derek C Angus; Maurizio Cecconi; Bin Du; Rob Fowler; Charles D Gomersall; Peter Horby; Nicole P Juffermans; Jozef Kesecioglu; Ruth M Kleinpell; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Geert Meyfroidt; Andrew Rhodes; Kathryn Rowan; Jean-François Timsit; Jean-Louis Vincent; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.