J A Kanis1,2, H Johansson3,4, N C Harvey5,6, V Gudnason7,8, G Sigurdsson7, K Siggeirsdottir7, M Lorentzon3,9, E Liu3, L Vandenput3,10, E V McCloskey4,11. 1. Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. w.j.pontefract@shef.ac.uk. 2. Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. w.j.pontefract@shef.ac.uk. 3. Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK. 5. MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 6. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. 7. Icelandic Heart Association Research Institute, Kopavogur, Iceland. 8. University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 9. Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 10. Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 11. Mellanby Centre for bone research, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
The risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is particularly high immediately following the fracture. This study provides adjustments to FRAX-based fracture probabilities accounting for the site of a recent fracture. INTRODUCTION: The recency of prior fractures affects subsequent fracture risk. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of a recent sentinel fracture, by site, on the 10-year probability of fracture determined with FRAX. METHODS: The study used data from the Reykjavik Study fracture register that documented prospectively all fractures at all skeletal sites in a large sample of the population of Iceland. Fracture probabilities were determined after a sentinel fracture (humeral, clinical vertebral, forearm and hip fracture) from the hazards of death and fracture. Fracture probabilities were computed on the one hand for sentinel fractures occurring within the previous 2 years and on the other hand, probabilities for a prior osteoporotic fracture irrespective of recency. The probability ratios provided adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability for recent sentinel fractures. RESULTS: Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture for recent sentinel fractures were age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women. Probability ratios varied according to the site of sentinel fracture with higher ratios for hip and vertebral fracture than for humerus or forearm fracture. Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a hip fracture for recent sentinel fractures were also age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women with the exception of forearm fractures. CONCLUSION: The probability ratios provide adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability for recent sentinel fractures.
The risk of a recurrent fragility fracture is particularly high immediately following the fracture. This study provides adjustments to FRAX-based fracture probabilities accounting for the site of a recent fracture. INTRODUCTION: The recency of prior fractures affects subsequent fracture risk. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of a recent sentinel fracture, by site, on the 10-year probability of fracture determined with FRAX. METHODS: The study used data from the Reykjavik Study fracture register that documented prospectively all fractures at all skeletal sites in a large sample of the population of Iceland. Fracture probabilities were determined after a sentinel fracture (humeral, clinical vertebral, forearm and hip fracture) from the hazards of death and fracture. Fracture probabilities were computed on the one hand for sentinel fractures occurring within the previous 2 years and on the other hand, probabilities for a prior osteoporotic fracture irrespective of recency. The probability ratios provided adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability for recent sentinel fractures. RESULTS: Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture for recent sentinel fractures were age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women. Probability ratios varied according to the site of sentinel fracture with higher ratios for hip and vertebral fracture than for humerus or forearm fracture. Probability ratios to adjust 10-year FRAX probabilities of a hip fracture for recent sentinel fractures were also age dependent, decreasing with age in both men and women with the exception of forearm fractures. CONCLUSION: The probability ratios provide adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability for recent sentinel fractures.
Authors: L Hansen; K D Petersen; S A Eriksen; B L Langdahl; P A Eiken; K Brixen; B Abrahamsen; J-E B Jensen; T Harsløf; P Vestergaard Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Patrick Haentjens; Olof Johnell; John A Kanis; Roger Bouillon; Cyrus Cooper; Guyve Lamraski; Dirk Vanderschueren; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Steven Boonen Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2004-09-20 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J A Kanis; O Johnell; C De Laet; H Johansson; A Oden; P Delmas; J Eisman; S Fujiwara; P Garnero; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse Journal: Bone Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: O Johnell; J A Kanis; A Odén; I Sernbo; I Redlund-Johnell; C Petterson; C De Laet; B Jönsson Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-12-23 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Sören Möller; Michael K Skjødt; Lin Yan; Bo Abrahamsen; Lisa M Lix; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; John A Kanis; Katrine Hass Rubin; William D Leslie Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: L Vandenput; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; E Liu; K E Åkesson; F A Anderson; R Azagra; C L Bager; C Beaudart; H A Bischoff-Ferrari; E Biver; O Bruyère; J A Cauley; J R Center; R Chapurlat; C Christiansen; C Cooper; C J Crandall; S R Cummings; J A P da Silva; B Dawson-Hughes; A Diez-Perez; A B Dufour; J A Eisman; P J M Elders; S Ferrari; Y Fujita; S Fujiwara; C-C Glüer; I Goldshtein; D Goltzman; V Gudnason; J Hall; D Hans; M Hoff; R J Hollick; M Huisman; M Iki; S Ish-Shalom; G Jones; M K Karlsson; S Khosla; D P Kiel; W-P Koh; F Koromani; M A Kotowicz; H Kröger; T Kwok; O Lamy; A Langhammer; B Larijani; K Lippuner; D Mellström; T Merlijn; A Nordström; P Nordström; T W O'Neill; B Obermayer-Pietsch; C Ohlsson; E S Orwoll; J A Pasco; F Rivadeneira; B Schei; A-M Schott; E J Shiroma; K Siggeirsdottir; E M Simonsick; E Sornay-Rendu; R Sund; K M A Swart; P Szulc; J Tamaki; D J Torgerson; N M van Schoor; T P van Staa; J Vila; N J Wareham; N C Wright; N Yoshimura; M C Zillikens; M Zwart; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; W D Leslie; J A Kanis Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Celia L Gregson; David J Armstrong; Jean Bowden; Cyrus Cooper; John Edwards; Neil J L Gittoes; Nicholas Harvey; John Kanis; Sarah Leyland; Rebecca Low; Eugene McCloskey; Katie Moss; Jane Parker; Zoe Paskins; Kenneth Poole; David M Reid; Mike Stone; Julia Thomson; Nic Vine; Juliet Compston Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 2.879
Authors: L Iconaru; M Moreau; F Baleanu; V Kinnard; A Charles; A Mugisha; M Surquin; F Benoit; R Karmali; M Paesmans; J J Body; P Bergmann Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: M Chandran; P J Mitchell; T Amphansap; S K Bhadada; M Chadha; D-C Chan; Y-S Chung; P Ebeling; N Gilchrist; A Habib Khan; P Halbout; F L Hew; H-P T Lan; T C Lau; J K Lee; S Lekamwasam; G Lyubomirsky; L B Mercado-Asis; A Mithal; T V Nguyen; D Pandey; I R Reid; A Suzuki; T T Chit; K L Tiu; T Valleenukul; C K Yung; Y L Zhao Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 4.507