Literature DB >> 32613409

Persistence and adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies: a systematic review.

G Koller1, V Goetz1, B Vandermeer2, J Homik1, F A McAlister3, D Kendler4, C Ye5.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of low bone mass and fragility. Treatment is frequently compromised by suboptimal medication compliance causing increased morbidity. This review investigates adherence and persistence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Findings reveal parenteral medications requiring reduced dosing frequency have higher compliance than oral therapies. This systematic review examines real-world adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies. We searched PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases for English language observational studies that examined patient adherence and/or persistence to parenteral osteoporosis treatments (teriparatide sc, ibandronate iv, zoledronic acid iv, and denosumab sc) in adults with osteoporosis published up to September 2018. Studies with only self-reported adherence or persistence data and those with less than 20 patients were excluded. Quality assessment of included studies was completed using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). We identified 40 eligible studies. Teriparatide was examined in 29 studies, with persistence rates of 10-87% (median 55%) at 1 year and 10-69% (median 29.5%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21-89% (median 53%) at 1 year and 37-68% (median 40%) at 2 years. Ten studies of zoledronic acid reported persistence rates of 34-73% (median 42%) for second dose and 20-54% (median 35.8%) for third dose. Ten studies of ibandronate adherence reported and 2-year persistence rates of 31-58% (median 47.5%) in 1 year and 13-35% (median 25%) at 2 years, and adherence rates of 21-72% (median 47.3%) and 15-58% (median 36.5%) respectively. Denosumab was reported in 19 studies, with second (1 year) and fourth (2 year) dose persistence rates of 61-100% (median 81%) and 36-99% (median 45.5%). There is substantial heterogeneity in reports of persistence and adherence rates with parenteral osteoporosis therapies. Most of the published data are from short-term studies and evaluations of long-term adherence and persistence with parenteral therapies for osteoporosis are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Compliance; Osteoporosis; Parenteral; Persistence

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613409     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05507-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Ewald Boschitsch; Oliver Naegele; Anita Klinger; Harald Brix-Samoylenko
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Osteoporosis in Older Men With a History of Falls.

Authors:  Kouta Ito
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  Poor adherence to parenteral osteoporosis therapies during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Roland Kocijan; Martina Behanova; Berthold Reichardt; Judith Haschka; Annemarie Kocijan; Jochen Zwerina
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Cost-effectiveness of buffered soluble alendronate 70 mg effervescent tablet for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Italy.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; S Maggi; N Veronese; L Sartori; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Persistence with oral bisphosphonates and denosumab among older adults in primary care in Ireland.

Authors:  Mary E Walsh; Tom Fahey; Frank Moriarty
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  The Effect of Teriparatide Treatment on the Risk of Fragility Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: Results from the Asian and Latin America Fracture Observational Study (ALAFOS).

Authors:  Chung-Hwan Chen; Abdulaziz H Elsalmawy; Sophia Ish-Shalom; Seung-Jae Lim; Nadia S AlAli; Joao L Cunha-Borges; Huilin Yang; Noemi Casas; Lale Altan; Zhanna Belaya; Fernando Marin; Thomas Moll; Sirel Gurbuz; Alan Brnabic; Imre Pavo; Sandra Florez
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Cost-effectiveness of romosozumab for the treatment of postmenopausal women at very high risk of fracture in Canada.

Authors:  Ron Goeree; Natasha Burke; Manon Jobin; Jacques P Brown; Donna Lawrence; Björn Stollenwerk; Damon Willems; Ben Johnson
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 9.  Anabolic treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Neelam Hassan; Celia L Gregson; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-05-05

10.  Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate for older osteoporotic women in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Mori; Carolyn J Crandall; Tomoko Fujii; David A Ganz
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.