Literature DB >> 32613395

Risk factors for cervical spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

In-Woon Baek1, Young Bin Joo2, Kyung-Su Park2, Ki-Jo Kim3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spine (C-spine) instability is a unique and significant characteristic of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because its occurrence is not rare and it can cause compressive cervical myelopathy, which may lead to serious neurologic sequelae. This study evaluated the prevalence and risk factors of C-spine instabilities in RA patients with a focus on anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies.
METHODS: The presence of C-spine instabilities in 1114 patients with RA was evaluated using C-spine radiographies according to the defined metrics. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of C-spine instability. The initiation of biologic DMARDs was assessed via a Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using log-rank tests.
RESULTS: In total, 306 (27.5%) patients presented with C-spine instabilities. The most common type was atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS; n = 199 [17.9%]). Male sex, positivity for rheumatoid factor and ACPA, erosive change in the peripheral joints, and presence of osteoporosis were independently associated with C-spine instabilities (all P < 0.05). In particular, positivity for ACPA was the most powerful risk factor (odds ratio: 2.33 [95% confidence interval: 1.37, 3.96], P = 0.002), and it was closely associated with AAS. Patients with AAS were at a higher risk for early initiation of biologic DMARDs.
CONCLUSIONS: Positivity for ACPA was a significant risk factor for C-spine instability, and AAS was remarkably correlated to the early initiation of biologic DMARDs, a surrogate index of poor long-term outcomes. Key Points • The presence of antibodies against citrullinated proteins was a strong risk factor for C-spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. • Atlantoaxial subluxation was significantly associated with early initiation of biologic DMARDs, a surrogate index of poor long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-citrullinated proteins antibody; Atlantoaxial subluxation; Cervical spine instability; Rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613395     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05243-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  26 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis--a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Simone Appenzeller
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 9.754

2.  Prevalence of radiological changes in the cervical spine--a cross sectional study after 20 years from presentation of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M H Neva; K Kaarela; M Kauppi
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Natural history of rheumatoid cervical subluxations.

Authors:  P H Smith; J Sharp; J H Kellgren
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Risk factors for development and progression of atlantoaxial subluxation in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Joong Kyong Ahn; Ji-Won Hwang; Ji-Min Oh; Jaejoon Lee; You Sun Lee; Chan Hong Jeon; Hoon-Suk Cha; Eun-Mi Koh
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Radiological cervical spine involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Anastasia K Zikou; Yannis Alamanos; Maria I Argyropoulou; Niki Tsifetaki; Constantinos Tsampoulas; Paraskevi V Voulgari; Stavros C Efremidis; Alexandros A Drosos
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  A long-term follow-up study of cervical lesions in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  K Fujiwara; H Owaki; M Fujimoto; K Yonenobu; T Ochi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-12

7.  Incidence and risk factors for cervical lesions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under the current pharmacologic treatment paradigm.

Authors:  Takashi Kaito; Shirou Ohshima; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Takahiro Makino; Kazuo Yonenobu; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Mod Rheumatol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.023

8.  Influence of systemic bone mineral density on atlantoaxial subluxation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M H Han; J I Ryu; C H Kim; J M Kim; J H Cheong; K H Bak; H J Chun
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Long-term follow-up of the cervical spine with conventional radiographs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Blom; M C W Creemers; W Kievit; J A M Lemmens; P L C M van Riel
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Anne Barton; Gerd R Burmester; Paul Emery; Gary S Firestein; Arthur Kavanaugh; Iain B McInnes; Daniel H Solomon; Vibeke Strand; Kazuhiko Yamamoto
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 52.329

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Analysis of cervical instability and clinical characteristics in treatment-naive rheumatoid arthritis patients].

Authors:  L Zhang; X H Hu; C Chen; Y M Cai; Q W Wang; J X Zhao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-12-18

Review 2.  Pathoanatomy, biomechanics, and treatment of upper cervical ligamentous instability: A literature review.

Authors:  Neeraj Vij; Hannah Tolson; Hayley Kiernan; Veena Agusala; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.