Literature DB >> 32613363

Is it Wise to Omit Sentinel Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer?

James Sun1, Brittany J Mathias1,2, Weihong Sun1, William J Fulp3,4, Jun-Min Zhou3, Christine Laronga1, Loretta S Loftus1, M Catherine Lee5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Society of Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely® guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years. We examined the effect of SLNB on treatment and outcomes in this population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive cN0 women ≥ 70 years of age who received SLNB was performed. We collected clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment data. Patients were compared according to SLN status with subset analysis of HR-positive patients. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable analysis, and were compared using log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 345 (69%) were SLN-negative. Median age was 74 years (range 70-96). Most tumors were T1 (72%), N0 (69%), invasive ductal (77%), without lymphovascular invasion (88%), estrogen receptor-positive (88%) and progesterone receptor-positive (75%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (88%) treated with lumpectomy (71%). Median number of SLNs obtained was 2 (range 0-12) and median number of positive SLNs was 0 (range 0-8). Characteristics of the HR-positive subset were similar. In both the overall cohort and the HR-positive subset, SLN status significantly affected the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, although no significant effect on recurrence was observed. SLN-negative patients had better overall survival and less distant recurrence (both p < 0.0001). Adjuvant hormone therapy significantly improved overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: SLNB can be safely omitted in elderly patients with T1, HR-positive, invasive ductal carcinoma tumors, but may still provide important information affecting treatment. Patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should still be considered for SLNB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613363     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08759-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Omitting SLNB in Breast Cancer: Is a Nomogram the Answer?

Authors:  A M Moorman; E J Th Rutgers; E A Kouwenhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Long-term survival in elderly women receiving chemotherapy for non-metastatic breast cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Castelo; Justin Lu; Lawrence Paszat; Zachary Veitch; Kuan Liu; Adena S Scheer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.624

3.  The Influence of Screening Mammography Cessation and Resumption on Breast Cancer Presentation and Treatment: A Multi-Hospital Health System Experience During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Holly Mason; Ann-Kristin Friedrich; Shiva Niakan; Danielle Jacobbe; Jesse Casaubon; Aixa Pérez Coulter
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2022-09-28

Review 4.  Breast Cancer in Geriatric Patients: Current Landscape and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Fawzi Abu Rous; Fawzi Abuhijla; Nayef Abdel-Razeq; Sarah Edaily
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.829

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.