| Literature DB >> 32613355 |
Khin Thet Thet1,2, Kamonwan Lunha2, Arpasiri Srisrattakarn2, Aroonlug Lulitanond2, Ratree Tavichakorntrakool2, Waewta Kuwatjanakul3, Nicha Charoensri2, Aroonwadee Chanawong4.
Abstract
Colistin is the last resort for the treatment of infections with carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria particularly Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Currently, both colistin-resistant and -heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates have been reported globally. We therefore investigated the colistin heteroresistance rate in 75 non-duplicate colistin-susceptible CRAB clinical isolates from a Thai university collected in 2016. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin for all isolates were determined by broth microdilution method and carbapenemase genes were detected by PCR methods. All isolates were genotyped by ERIC-PCR method and screened for colistin heteroresistance by modified population analysis profile (PAP) method. The colistin MIC range for the 75 isolates was 0.5-2 µg/mL, with MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 and 2 µg/mL, respectively. Thirty-three isolates (44%) were considered colistin-heteroresistant with subpopulations growing at 3-8 μg/mL of colistin. After three daily passages of the subpopulations on antibiotic-free medium, their colistin MICs ranged from 4 to > 32 µg/mL, with MIC50 and MIC90 of 32 and > 32 µg/mL, respectively. Eight different ERIC-PCR profiles were obtained among the 33 isolates and all carried blaOXA-23-like. The high rate of colistin heteroresistance in the CRAB isolates highlights the possibility of treatment failure of CRAB infections by colistin due to the selection of colistin-resistant subpopulations.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Carbapenemase genes; Colistin heteroresistance; ERIC-PCR; Population analysis profile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32613355 PMCID: PMC7327205 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-020-02873-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0959-3993 Impact factor: 3.312
MICs of various antimicrobials for the 75 colistin-susceptible CRAB isolates
| Antimicrobial agents | MICs (µg/mL)a | % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranges | MIC50 | MIC90 | S | I | R | |
| Amikacin (0.5–64) | ≤ 0.5 to 64 | > 64 | > 64 | 25.3 | 1.3 | 73.4 |
| Gentamicin (0.25–32) | ≤ 0.25 to 32 | > 32 | > 32 | 10.7 | 2.7 | 86.6 |
| Ciprofloxacin (0.004–32) | 2–32 | > 32 | > 32 | 0 | 1.3 | 98.7 |
| Ceftazidime (0.125–256) | 8–256 | > 256 | > 256 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 97.4 |
| Imipenem (0.125–256) | 16–256 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Meropenem (0.125–256) | 16–256 | 64 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Fosfomycin (0.25–256) | 64–256 | 128 | 256 | 10.7 | 53.3 | 36 |
| Tigecycline (0.031–32) | 0.5–16 | 4 | 8 | 2.7 | – | 97.3 |
| Colistin (0.125–32) | 0.5–2 | 1 | 2 | 100 | – | 0 |
S susceptible, I intermediate, R resistant
aMICs of all antimicrobials tested were determined by the agar dilution method except for those of colistin using the BMD method
Fig. 1Population analysis profiles of the CRAB clinical isolates with heteroresistant subpopulations (isolates A132, A212 and A275) and colistin susceptibility (isolate A87), and colistin-susceptible control strain (P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853)
Characteristics of the 33 colistin-heteroresistant CRAB clinical isolates
| No. of isolates | Carbapenemase genes | ERIC | MICs (µg/mL) | Resistant subpopulations | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AK | G | CIP | CZ | IP | ME | FS | TG | CT | Growth at colistin concentration | Colistin MICs | |||
| 7 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 32–64 | 32–64 | 128–256 | 4–8 | 2 | 4–8 | 8- > 32 | |
| 3 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 64 | 64–128 | 128–256 | 2 | 1–2 | 4–8 | 32- > 32 | |
| 2 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 64 | 128 | 128–256 | 8 | 1–2 | 5–6 | 32- > 32 | |
| 2 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 64–128 | 64–128 | > 256 | 2 | 1–2 | 5 | 8–16 | |
| 1 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 16 | 64 | 128 | 4 | 1 | 3 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 256 | 256 | 128 | 4 | 2 | 5 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 128 | 128 | > 256 | 4 | 1 | 5 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster C | 4 | 8 | > 32 | > 256 | 32 | 64 | 128 | 4 | 2 | 4 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster C | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 128 | 128 | 128 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster E | 4 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 32 | 32 | 256 | 4 | 1 | 5 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster E | 2 | 0.5 | > 32 | > 256 | 32 | 32 | 128 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1 | Cluster E | < 0.5 | ≤ 0.25 | 32 | > 256 | 64 | 64 | 256 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 16 | |
| 2 | Cluster B | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 32–64 | 32–64 | 256 | 2–4 | 2 | 8 | 32- > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster A | 4 | 8 | > 32 | 16 | 64 | 64 | 256 | 8 | 2 | 5 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster A | 8 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 64 | 32 | 256 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | |
| 2 | Cluster D | 1 | 16–32 | > 32 | 64 | 32 | 16–32 | 128–256 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 32- > 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster D | < 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 128 | 32 | 16 | 128 | 0.5 | 1 | 6 | > 32 | |
| 1 | Singleton | 1 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 32 | 32 | 128 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 16 | |
| 1 | Cluster F | 4 | 4 | > 32 | > 256 | 32 | 32 | 128 | 16 | 2 | 8 | 32 | |
| 1 | Cluster F | 8 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 16 | 32 | 128 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| 1 | Singleton | > 64 | > 32 | > 32 | > 256 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 4 | 1 | 4 | > 32 | |
AK amikacin, CIP ciprofloxacin, CT colistin, CZ ceftazidime, G gentamicin, FS fosfomycin, IP imipenem, ME meropenem, TG tigecycline
aHighest colistin concentration that the isolate grew in the PAP method
bMICs of heteroresistant subpopulations after 3 daily passages onto the colistin-free medium
Fig. 2Dendrogram of ERIC-PCR from the 33 colistin-heteroresistant CRAB clinical isolates generated by BioNumerics using the UPGMA and the Dice coefficient. Dashed line indicates 80% similarity cut-off