Literature DB >> 32613168

TNFAIP8 family gene expressions in the mouse tail intervertebral disc injury model.

Zuozhen Tian1, Frances S Shofer2, Lutian Yao3,4, Honghong Sun5, Hongtao Zhang5, Ling Qin2, Youhai H Chen5, Yejia Zhang1,3,6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The TNF-α-induced protein-8 (TNFAIP8, also known as TIPE) family of molecules comprises four members: TNFAIP8 and TIPEs1-3. Since the first description of these proteins, their roles in fine-tuning inflammation and in directing leukocyte migration have been described in several organ systems. However, their relationship with intervertebral disc (IVD) is unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we describe the expression of TNFAIP8 family genes in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) of the normal adult murine IVD. We further describe the expression of these genes in the injured male and female murine IVD.
RESULTS: Tnfaip8 gene expression was decreased, and Tipe1 gene expression was essentially unchanged, in response to injury. Tipe2 and Tipe3 gene expression was markedly elevated in response to IVD injury, along with those encoding known inflammatory markers (ie, Tnfa, Il6, Cxcl1, and Adam8). Additionally, sex-related differences were also observed for some of these genes in intact and injured mouse IVDs. Future studies include examining tissue distribution of TNFAIP8 family proteins and identifying cells that produce them. In addition, examining mice that are deficient in TNFAIP8 molecules, in relation to gene expression, tissue morphology and mouse behavior, may further delineate the roles of these molecules in IVD inflammation and degeneration.
© 2020 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immune response; inflammation; injury

Year:  2020        PMID: 32613168      PMCID: PMC7323467          DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JOR Spine        ISSN: 2572-1143


INTRODUCTION

Back pain related to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration costs billions of dollars in the U.S. , Current treatments include surgical and nonsurgical approaches, and often result in incomplete symptom relief because the molecular relationships between back pain and IVD degeneration are still unclear. Clinically, patients with chronic back pain often have histories of injuries. Uncovering mechanisms of disc inflammation following injury may shed light on the mechanism of spinal pain. The TNFAIP8 (tumor necrosis factor‐α‐induced protein 8; TNFAIP8) family are newly described regulators of immunity and tumorigenesis consisting of four highly homologous mammalian proteins: TNFAIP8, TIPE1 (TNFAIP8‐like 1, or TNFAIP8L1), TIPE2 (TNFAIP8L2), and TIPE3 (TNFAIP8L3). They are novel signaling proteins recently described to be key factors regulating inflammation and oncogenesis. , , Interestingly, despite significant sequence homology among the four members of this family, they are involved in different biological activities and exhibit remarkable variability of expression. Furthermore, this family of proteins is highly dysregulated in arthritis, cancers and various other chronic diseases. TNFAIP8 is a founding member of the TNFAIP8 family, originally identified in head and neck cancer cells, and in cells treated with TNF‐α. TNFAIP8 is a negative regulator of apoptosis, and is oncogenic. , Moreover, TNFAIP8 protein inhibits apoptosis by inhibiting Caspase‐8. Knocking out the Tnfaip8 gene exacerbated disease in a dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) model of murine colitis. Indeed, phospho‐AKT (also known as protein kinase B [PKB]) activity decreased in TNFAIP8 knockout colonic cells, indicating that TNFAIP8 may regulate epithelial cell death by targeting AKT. The increased mortality in TNFAIP8 knockout mice with colitis could be explained by increased cell death, and decreased proliferation of colonic epithelial cells. In mice, TIPE1 was found to be expressed in a wide variety of tissues and cells, including neurons, hepatocytes, muscle tissue, intestinal epithelial cells, and germ cells. TIPE1 interacts with Rac1 and inhibits activation of downstream p65 and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase signaling, which increased caspase‐mediated apoptosis. TIPE2 was discovered by genomic profiling of inflamed neural tissues. , TIPE2 was found to be widely expressed in lymphoid tissues; its knockout in mice resulted in the development of spontaneous multiorgan inflammation, splenomegaly and premature death, and these mice were hypersensitive to toll‐like receptor (TLR) stimulation. Recently, it was found that leukocyte polarity was generated by TIPE2, a transfer protein for phosphoinositide second messengers. TIPE2 functioned as a local enhancer of phosphoinositide‐dependent signaling and cytoskeleton remodeling, which promoted leading‐edge formation. TIPE3 is the most recently investigated TNFAIP8 family member. TIPE3 protein is preferentially expressed in reproductive and neural tissues, with nearly identical murine and human expression profiles. TIPE3 is the transfer protein of lipid second messengers that promote cancer. Several TIPE proteins have been crystallized. , Knockout mice for TNFAIP8 and TIPE2 have also been generated, , and should be valuable for studying inflammation in the musculoskeletal system, including back pain related to IVD injuries. Inflammatory cytokines and chemokines have been found in painful/degenerative human IVDs. , , However, TNFAIP8 family gene expression in mouse IVDs has not been described previously. This study is the first that describes gene expression profiles of the TIPE molecules in response to injury, an important step toward understanding the roles of the TNFAIP8 family of proteins in IVD inflammation. The mouse model permits examination of IVD degeneration in mice with genetic modifications, allowing the role of a specific molecule in the disease process to be studied. Overall, mice and humans share virtually the same set of genes. Almost every gene found in one species so far has been found in a closely related form in the other. It is, however, important to be aware of the limitations of modeling human spinal disease using animals, and to recognize that the biomechanical properties of the mouse tail differ from those of the human spine. The mouse tail IVD injury model was established by Yang et al and Martin et al. We have recently refined the procedure using a percutaneous needle puncture approach, and have shown that needle injury results in a reproducible course of morphological and molecular changes consistent with IVD degeneration. , Among the four time points we studied, reproducible changes in gene expression and histology occurred at 1 week post injury. Accordingly, this time point was selected to examine TNFAIP8 family member gene expression. DBA mice are used in the musculoskeletal field, because they are more susceptible to some types of arthritis than the C57BL/6 (also known as B6) strain. We have found that ADAM8 plays important roles in arthritis , , and in IVD degeneration. Our ongoing work on the role of Adam8 in intervertebral disc degeneration uses a mouse with ADAM8 inactivated by introducing the E330Q mutation into its proteolytic domain. This animal is on the DBA background, and the Tnfaip8 gene expression studies are performed with these mice. Since TNFα is a known inducer of the TNFAIP8 family, the Tnfα gene was also included in the panel of genes examined. We have also examined genes encoding inflammatory cytokines/chemokines related disc degeneration such as Il6 and Cxcl1 in this study. The Adam8 gene was included because of its relationship with inflammation and fibronectin cleavage in the IVD. Finally, in order to comment on potential differences in gene expression pattern between male and female animals per National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines, we have examined previously mice of both sexes and found subtle but at times significant differences in expression patterns of selected genes. Therefore, we have analyzed data from male and female mice separately in the present study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mice

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Thirty young adult mice 10 to 11 weeks of age, on the DBA background (DBA/1LacJ, the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were used in this study. Twelve female and 12 male mice were used for tail IVD injury experiment, and 6 female mice were used to isolate nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) tissues for RNA extraction. Mice were housed under pathogen‐free conditions with environmental enrichment (nestlets by Ancare, Bellmore, New York), and up to five animals per cage. Mice were fed PicoLab diet no. 5053 (LabDiet, Fort Worth, Texas) without restriction, provided with acidified bottled water, and maintained on a 12:12‐hours light:dark cycle. Room temperature is at 21.1°C to 24.4°C (equivalent to 70 F‐76 F) and humidity at 30% to 70%.

NP and AF dissection

The lumbar and coccygeal vertebrae were isolated with a scalpel under a dissecting microscope (VistaVision, VWR International, Radnor, Pennsylvania), as described previously. The gelatinous NP was scraped off with a scalpel. AF tissues, identified by their concentric rings, were shaved off the cartilaginous endplate with a scalpel. Lumbar and coccygeal IVDs were pooled for each animal.

Tail injury surgery

Surgery was performed as described previously. Specifically, each mouse was anesthetized with Ketamine (90 mg/kg) and Xylazine (10 mg/kg) subcutaneously. Under anesthesia, the skin was cleaned with betadine. Under fluoroscopic guidance with a mini C‐arm (OrthoScan FD Pulse Mini C‐Arm, Orthoscan Inc., Scottsdale, AZ), the mouse coccygeal (Co) IVDs were identified, and a 26G needle was inserted into the IVD space until the needle tip reached ~2/3 of the disc thickness. This information has been included in our recent manuscript as a supplemental figure. Care was taken not to puncture the opposing wall of the AF. Indeed, when the opposing AF wall was damaged, a more severe injury was seen on MRI. Gelatinous tissues were often found on the needle tip after this had been removed, suggesting that the needle puncture induces an acute herniation of the gelatinous NP of the IVD. In the current study, the Co3/4 and Co5/6 IVDs in each mouse were injured, while Co4/5 and Co6/7 served as intact controls, as described previously. Mice were checked 4 hours after surgery and the next day. The mice were then monitored daily until the endpoint. Even though mice did not show any signs of pain or distress, as a pre‐emptive treatment, mice were given buprenorphine at the time of sedation and 4 hours later. Animals were sacrificed by exposure to CO2 at 1 week after tail disc injury. From each mouse tail, Co3/4 (injured) and Co4/5 (intact control) discs were isolated individually for RNA extraction. Specifically, IVD tissues were separated from their adjacent cartilaginous endplates and bone with a scalpel, under a dissecting microscope (VistaVision, VWR International, Radnor, Pennsylvania). Co5/6 (injured) and Co6/7 (intact control) were isolated en bloc for histological examination.

RNA isolation and quantitative real‐time PCR

Total cellular RNA was isolated by the Trizol method as described previously. , Specifically, the isolated IVD tissues were soaked in RNALater (Ambion, Foster City, California) overnight, and stored at −80°C until extraction. On the day of RNA extraction, RNALater was removed and the tissues were snap frozen with liquid Nitrogen, pulverized, and then transferred into Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). The tissues were homogenized with a homogenizer with disposable OmniTip probes for hard tissue (Omni International, Kennesaw, Georgia). RNA was precipitated with 70% ethanol, and was further purified using a RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen). RNA concentration was determined using a Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek, Winooski, Vermont). To generate cDNA, all RNA from each IVD was used as template in a reverse transcriptase reaction using the SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California) containing random hexamers, and added polyDT primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). CDNA sequences were retrieved from Ensembl (ensembl.org, release 84, March 2016). Primers for real‐time PCR (Gapdh, Tnfa, Il6, Cxcl1, and Adam8 genes) were designed using Primer‐BLAST, and synthesized by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, California), as described previously.26 Primers for Tnfaip8, Tipe 1‐3 were purchased (QuantiTect Primer, Qiagen). For each PCR reaction, cDNA, SYBR Select master mix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California), and primers (working concentration 0.5 μM) were mixed, and deionized water was added to a total volume of 20 μL per reaction. MicroAmp Optical 96‐well reaction plates (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) with 20 μL of reaction mix/well were sealed with optical adhesive film (Life Technologies, Frederick, Maryland) and run in a ViiA7 real‐time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) using the following program: (1) 50°C for 2 minutes, (2) 95°C for 2 minutes, (3) 95°C for 15 seconds, (4) 58°C for 1 minute, (5) repeat steps 3 and 4 a total of 40 times. Single products were confirmed by determining melting curves at the conclusion of the reaction. Expression of each gene was normalized to gapdh (reference gene), and results are expressed as target gene/gapdh ratio, equal to 2‐ΔCt. ,

Histological evaluation

The IVDs and portions of the adjacent bony vertebral bodies were isolated immediately after euthanasia. The disc with its surrounding vertebral bodies was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 hours. The bone‐disc‐bone segments were decalcified with a solution consisting of 12.5% EDTA for ~1 week, with shaking, until the bony portion was completely decalcified. The tissues were then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin and sectioned to 5 μM thickness. For Picrosirius red staining, sections were stained with 0.1% Picrosirius red (Sigma) for 45 minutes. All samples were examined under a light microscope (Nikon) and photographed.

Statistics

The expression ratio for genes of interest (Tnfaip8, Tipe1‐3, Il6, Cxcl1, Adam8, and Tnfα) and house‐keeping gene (Gapdh) were calculated for each sample. If expression ratio was not normally distributed, data were log transformed. To assess differences in gene expression ratio, two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in repeated measures where the grouping factor was sex, and the repeated measure injury/intact were performed. To minimize type I error, post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey‐Kramer tests were performed to examine differences between injured/intact tissues and tissues from mice of different sexes. A P‐value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

Tnfaip8 family gene expression in the intact NP and AF tissues

To examine whether Tnfaip8 family of genes is expressed in the intact mouse IVDs, we used mice that have not had tail IVD injuries. We isolated NP and AF tissues as described previously. The expression ratio for genes of interest (Tnfaip8, and Tipe1‐3) and housekeeping gene (Gapdh) were calculated for NP and AF. There was detectable expression of all four members of the TNFAIP8 family, although the overall levels were low compared with those of the extracellular matrix molecules. There was no statistically significant difference in tnfaip8 gene expression between NP and AF (Tnfaip8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 0.0346 and 0.0540 in the NP and AF, respectively; n = 6 mice, P = .2049; Figure 1A). Tipe1 was expressed at a higher level in the AF than in the NP (Tipe1 to Gapdh ratio 0.0068 and 0.0493 in the NP and AF, respectively; n = 6; P = .0312; Figure 1B). The gene expression level of Tipe2 was very low in both NP and AF tissues (Tipe2 to Gapdh ratio: 1.27 × 10−7 and 1.44 × 10−5 in the NP and AF, respectively; n = 6, P = .1181; Figure 1C). It is worth mentioning that these levels are very low and quantification may not be reliable with the real‐time PCR methods used here. Tipe3 gene showed a tendency to higher expression in the AF than in the NP (Tipe3 to Gapdh ratio 0.0036 and 0.0297 in the NP and AF, respectively; n = 6; P = .0582; Figure 1D). Among the four genes, Tnfaip8 gene expression is the highest, and Tipe2 gene expression lowest both in NP and AF, with Tnfaip8 gene expression 5 and 3 orders of magnitude of Tipe2 in NP and AF, respectively (n = 6).
FIGURE 1

Tnfaip8 family gene expression in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intact mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfaip8 gene expression; B, Tipe1 gene expression; C, Tipe2 gene expression; D, Tipe3 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. *P ≤ .05

Tnfaip8 family gene expression in the nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) of the intact mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfaip8 gene expression; B, Tipe1 gene expression; C, Tipe2 gene expression; D, Tipe3 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. *P ≤ .05

Tnfaip8 family gene expression in the injured tail IVDs

In male mice, Tnfaip8 gene expression decreased in response to injury, compared with intact controls (Tnfaip8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 0.0068 in injured IVDs and 0.0128 in controls respectively; n = 12 mice; P = .0017; Figure 2A). In female mice, however, there was no statistically significant difference in Tnfaip8 gene expression in injured and intact IVDs (Tnfaip8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 0.0215 in injured, 0.0181 in controls, respectively; n = 11 mice; P = .1547). When analyzing all male and female mice together, Tnfaip8 gene expression decreased in injured discs compared with intact controls (n = 23, P = .0019; Figure 2A). Tnfaip8 gene expression was higher in female controls than in male control mice (P = .0333). Similarly, Tnfaip8 gene expression was higher in female injured than male injured discs (P = .0003; Figure 2A).
FIGURE 2

Gene expression of Tnfaip8 family in the injured mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfaip8 gene expression; B, Tipe1 gene expression; C, Tipe2 gene expression; D, Tipe3 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. **P ≤ .01; *P ≤ .05

Gene expression of Tnfaip8 family in the injured mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfaip8 gene expression; B, Tipe1 gene expression; C, Tipe2 gene expression; D, Tipe3 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. **P ≤ .01; *P ≤ .05 There was no statistically significant change in Tipe1 gene expression in injured IVDs compared with that in intact controls either in male mice (Tipe1 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 0.0088 in injured, 0.0109 in controls respectively; n = 12 mice; P = .4525) or in female mice (Tipe1 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 0.0255 in injured, 0.0180 in controls respectively; n = 11 mice; P = .7232). When analyzing all male and female mice together, Tipe1 gene expression in injured vs intact controls still did not show any statistical significance (n = 23, P = .2032). Similar to the Tnfaip8 gene, Tipe1 showed a trend for higher gene expression in female intact control discs than in male controls (P = .0599). The gene expression ratios in the injured IVDs are higher in injured females than males (P = .0274; Figure 2B). Tipe2 gene expression, on average, is three orders of magnitude lower in the intact IVDs compared with that of Tnfaip8 (n = 23 mice). Tipe2 gene expression increased significantly in mice of both sexes in response to injury, compared with intact controls. In male mice, Tipe2 to Gapdh gene expression ratios were 60.67 × 10−6 in injured discs and 5.55 × 10−6 in controls, respectively (n = 12 mice; P = .0048). In female mice, Tipe2 gene expression also increased in injured compared with intact IVDs (Tipe2 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 159.41 × 10−6 in injured, 8.53 × 10−6 in intact controls, respectively; n = 11 mice; P = .0024). When analyzing all male and female mice together, Tipe2 gene expression in injured IVDs was clearly elevated compared with that in intact IVDs (Tipe2 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 107.90 × 10−6 in injured IVDs and 6.97 × 10−6 in controls, respectively; n = 23, P = .0001). There was no statistically significant difference in Tipe2 gene expression between male and female mice, in either injured or control discs (P > .0500; Figure 2C). Tipe3 gene expression increased significantly in male mice in response to injury, compared with intact controls (Tipe3 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 322 × 10−5 in injured IVDs and 2.84 × 10−5 in controls, respectively; n = 6 mice; P < .0001). In female mice, there was no statistically significant difference in Tipe3 gene expression in injured vs intact controls (Tipe3 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 2497.85 × 10−5 in injured, 743.22 × 10−5 in intact controls, respectively; n = 5 mice; P = .7997). When analyzing all male and female mice together, Tipe3 gene expression in injured IVDs increased significantly compared with that in intact IVDs (Tipe3 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 1312 × 10−5 in injured IVDs and 339 × 10−5 in controls, respectively; n = 11, P < .0001). This interesting pattern of change in response to injury is due, at least in part, to higher Tipe3 gene expression in female control IVDs than in male controls (P < .0001; Figure 2D).

Proinflammatory cytokine (Tnfα, Il6, Cxcl1) and Adam8 gene expression

Tnfα gene expression is elevated in the injured IVDs compared with that in intact controls in both male mice (Tnfα to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 33.45 × 10−5 in injured disc, 9.18 × 10−5 in controls; n = 7 mice; P = .0011) and female mice (Tnfα to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 6.07 × 10−5 in injured, 2.62 × 10−5 in controls respectively; n = 8 mice; P = .0009). When combining the data from both sexes, Tnfα gene expression is elevated (Tnfα to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 18.84 × 10−5 in injured discs, 5.63 × 10−5 in controls; n = 15 mice; P < .0001; Figure 3A). Surprisingly, the males expressed higher levels of Tnfα than did female mice, both in injured discs and controls (P = .0004 and P = .0005 for injured and control discs, respectively; Figure 3A).
FIGURE 3

Pro‐inflammatory gene expression in the injured mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfα gene expression; B, Il6 gene expression; C, Cxcl1 gene expression; D, Adam8 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. **P ≤ .01; *P ≤ .05

Pro‐inflammatory gene expression in the injured mouse tail intervertebral disc. A, Tnfα gene expression; B, Il6 gene expression; C, Cxcl1 gene expression; D, Adam8 gene expression. Each point shows data from one intervertebral disc. **P ≤ .01; *P ≤ .05 The increase in Il6 gene expression did not reach statistical significance in either male or female mice when comparing injured discs with intact controls (n = 15 mice/group; P =.9818 and .3085, respectively). When data from both male and female mice are analyzed together, Il6 gene expression elevation in injured IVDs compared with controls reached statistical significance (Il6 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 6.79 × 10−4 in injured discs, 2.71 × 10−4 in controls; n = 30 mice; P = .0437). There was no statistically significant difference between the male and female mice, either in injured discs or controls (n = 15 mice/group; P > .0500; Figure 3B). There was no statistically significant increase in Cxcl1 gene expression in the injured compared with control discs in male mice (Cxcl1 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 98.87 × 10−4 in injured discs, 3.26 × 10−4 in controls; n = 19 mice; P = .3594). In female mice, there is a trend for increase in Cxcl1 gene expression (Cxcl1 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 126.50 × 10−4 in injured, 6.25 × 10−4 in controls; n = 19 mice; P = .0748). When analyzing male and female mice together, the Cxcl1 gene expression was significantly higher in the injured discs than in intact controls (Cxcl1 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 112.68 × 10−4 in injured, 4.76 × 10−4 in controls; n = 38 mice; P = .0055). There was no statistically significant difference between the male and female mice, either in injured discs or controls (n = 19 mice/group; P > .0500; Figure 3C). The increase in Adam8 gene expression in the injured compared with control discs in male mice was significant (Adam8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 55.15 × 10−4 in injured, 1.44 × 10−4 in controls; n = 19 mice; P < .0001). In female mice, adam8 gene expression was similarly elevated (Adam8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 87.37 × 10−4 in injured discs, 5.67 × 10−4 in controls; n = 19 mice; P < .0001). When analyzing male and female mice together, the Adam8 gene expression was higher in the injured discs than in intact controls (Adam8 to Gapdh gene expression ratio: 71.26 × 10−4 in injured discs, 3.56 × 10−4 in controls; n = 38 mice; P < .0001; Figure 3D). There was no statistically significant difference between the male and female mice, either in injured discs or in controls (n = 15 mice/group; P > .0500; Figure 3D).

Tail IVDs showed consistent histological changes following injury in mice of both sexes

We have examined histological features of the mouse tails following injury in mice on the DBA background, with Picrosirius red, to reveal changes in the content and orientation of the collagen bundles. There were consistent histological changes in both male and female IVDs post injury (n = 3‐9; Figure 4). Specifically, normal NP and AF architecture is revealed by Picrosirius red staining, in both the male and female mice (Figure 4A‐A″, C‐C″). Following injury, the IVD tissue showed loss of normal NP architecture, with collagen‐rich scar tissue replacing the normal NP (Figure 4B′,D′). Annular rings were distorted with some interruptions following injury (Figures 1D″ and 4B). Consistent with prior findings, we did not detect any significant differences in histological features between the male and female mice.
FIGURE 4

Histological changes in DBA mice 1 week after coccygeal intervertebral disc injury. Intact and adjacent injured IVDs were stained with Picrosirius red; A′‐D′ and A″‐D″ are magnified images in squares in A‐D, respectively. NP, nucleus pulposus; AF, annulus fibrosis. Scale bar in panel D represents 500 μm; scale bar in D" represents 50 μm

Histological changes in DBA mice 1 week after coccygeal intervertebral disc injury. Intact and adjacent injured IVDs were stained with Picrosirius red; A′‐D′ and A″‐D″ are magnified images in squares in A‐D, respectively. NP, nucleus pulposus; AF, annulus fibrosis. Scale bar in panel D represents 500 μm; scale bar in D" represents 50 μm

DISCUSSION

The TNFAIP8 family consists of four members, and recently has been found to regulate inflammatory processes, by interacting with inflammatory pathways and directing lymphocyte migration. , TNFAI8 and TIPE2‐deficient mice have been generated, , and may prove useful in studying inflammatory processes such as back pain and osteoarthritis in the musculoskeletal field. In the present manuscript, we described gene expression in intact and injured IVDs, which serves as baseline information for future mechanistic studies aimed at explaining potential roles of TNFAIP8 family members in homeostasis of the normal discs and their response to injury. In the intact IVDs, we were able to separate the NP and AF tissues based on gelatinous texture of the NP and presence of the annular rings in the AF. Gene expression of the four Tnfaip8 family members was analyzed separately (Figure 1). Similar to the profile of extracellular matrix and adhesion molecule genes, the TNFAIP8 family of genes tend to be more highly expressed in the AF than in NP. Among the four family members, the Tnfaip8 gene expression level is the highest, and Tipe2 gene expression the lowest, with its level barely measurable. This finding suggests that Tnfaip8 may be expressed by native disc tissues, and possibly important for normal tissue maintenance. Tipe2, known to be expressed mainly by leukocytes, may perform immune functions. This division of labor by molecules of the same family is reminiscent of the two subtypes of cyclooxygenases. The NP and AF tissues could no longer be reliably separated 1 week following needle puncture (Figure 4). Therefore, the tissues were analyzed as whole IVDs. In response to injury, Tnfaip8 gene expression decreased while Tipe2 and Tipe3 gene expression increased (Figure 2). These findings suggest that TNFAIP8 family members may perform different functions in the injury/repair process. TIPE2, preferentially found in leukocytes, may be expressed by infiltrating macrophages in response to injury, which has been shown in human degenerating IVDs. , Confirming or refuting this hypothesis is an important future direction. Future work could include in situ hybridization to show the distribution of mRNAs, and immunostaining to reveal the distribution of TNFAIP8 family protein and leukocyte markers, to identify the cell types that produce these molecules. One limitation of the study is that we have found subtle differences in biomechanical properties between bone‐disc‐bone motion segments of the mouse tail (Zhang‐Mauck, unpublished data), but we have not examined the effects of the mouse tail levels on gene expression. This should be examined in the future. Inclusion of sex as a biological variable in animal and human studies has been mandated by the NIH recently. This initiative is intended to rectify a prior model where biomedical research focused predominantly on male animals/subjects, potentially obscuring key understanding of sex influences on health processes and outcomes. However, including both sexes in experimental design would increase the animal number needed to design experiments with adequate power for data analysis, in order to yield unbiased and reproducible results. We have recently found and reported subtle differences in extracellular matrix and inflammatory gene expression between male and female mice. In the current study, we have found that Tnfaip8 and Tipe3 gene expression is significantly higher in female control than in their male counterparts (Figure 2A and D), while Tnfα gene expression is higher in both intact and injured male discs than in female tissues (Figure 3A). These findings, together with our previous findings, confirm the need for studies in both male and female animals in the disc injury model. Tnfα gene expression was higher in injured than in intact control IVDs 1 week post injury in both male and female mice (Figure 3A). TNFα may induce TNFAIP8 family members, although simply showing a concurrent gene expression change here does not prove causality. TNFα treatment has been shown to alter F‐actin and alpha‐tubulin in AF cells, suggestive of altered cytoskeletal stiffness. Anti‐TNFα (infliximab) significantly inhibited pro‐inflammatory cytokine production, while anti‐IL6 did not. TNFα altered AF cell mechanobiology with cytoskeletal remodeling that potentially sensitized AF cells to mechanical strain and increased TNFα‐induced pro‐inflammatory cytokine production. Exposure to TNFα induced expression of additional pro‐inflammatory cytokines and altered IVD mechanical behavior. One potential mechanism of TNFα‐induced cytoskeleton change may be by altering the function of the TNFAIP8 family members, since they have been found recently to direct leukocyte migration by reorganizing the cytoskeleton. Examining leukocyte infiltration in the injured IVDs would be an important future direction, to determine the relative contribution of inflammatory mediators by resident disc cells and infiltrating leukocytes. TNFα has been shown in herniated and degenerative human IVD tissues. , , The TNFα receptor (TNFR) has two subtypes, TNFR1 and TNFR2, with sometimes opposing functions to maintain the delicate balance of inflammation, cell death, and proliferation. , Interestingly, the level of TNFR1 has been positively correlated with back and radicular leg pain, while that of TNFR2 is negatively correlated with pain. Injecting TNFα into the lumbar IVD induces pain behavior and disc degeneration in rats. However, some clinical studies have shown efficacy of reducing back and radicular pain by protein factors that regulate TNFα signaling, , , but other such work did not show any benefit. The inconsistencies in clinical outcomes may be due, in part, to the fact that protein factors require injections, which was delivered either into the epidural space or subcutaneous tissue in the above‐mentioned trials. Permeability into the disc is limited by either method. Furthermore, these reagents block both TNFR1 and TNFR2, and may result in differing effects depending on disease stage, inciting factors, and other individual patient‐related factors such as genetics. The present work includes a study of IL6, a known marker of IVD degeneration. , CXCL1 and ADAM8, subjects of our previous studies, , , , have also been included. All three genes were found to be elevated in both male and female mice post injury, confirming that they are reliable molecular markers for disc injury. A broader range of molecules warrants examination. For example, we have examined differences in expression of 84 genes between NP and AF. A similar strategy could be used to examine differences in sex and genetic background in response to injury, in the wild type and TNFAIP8‐deficient mice. Novel methodology, such as RNASeq, could also be utilized to examine an even larger number of genes. In the aging mouse, the chondrocyte‐like NP cells have been shown to be of notochordal lineage. Although using lineage‐tracing method is not feasible in humans, it would not be surprising if the human NP cells after age 10 to 12 years of age are also of notochordal origin, although the cell morphology differs from that of notochordal cells in young humans. In addition, all four members of the mammalian TNFAIP8 family are highly conserved in their amino acid sequences. Further studies in other species are therefore indicated, since it is highly likely that the role of TNFAIP8 family members in local inflammation is translatable to other mammalian species including humans. In conclusion, genes of the Tnfaip8 family are expressed in the intact mouse IVDs. Tipe2 and Tipe3 genes are elevated in response to injury, along with other known inflammatory markers (ie, Tnfα, il6, Cxcl1, and Adam8). Surprisingly, the Tnfaip8 gene was downregulated in response to injury. Future directions include examining tissue distribution of TNFAIP8 family proteins and identifying cells that produce them. Studies examining the mechanisms of actions of this novel family of regulatory proteins in the IVD‐injury model are also indicated. In addition, examining mice that are deficient in TNFAIP8 family of molecules, with respect to gene expression, tissue morphology and mouse behavior, may further delineate the roles of these novel molecules in the etiology of IVD inflammation and degeneration.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no financial or other conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Data acquisition, Zuozhen Tian and Lutian Yao; Research design and/or data interpretation, Honghong Sun, Youhai H. Chen, Ling Qin, Hongtao Zhang, and Yejia Zhang. Drafting and revising manuscript: Yejia Zhang, Honghong Sun, Hongtao Zhang, Ling Qin, and Youhai H. Chen. Statistical analysis: Frances S. Shofer and Yejia Zhang. Storage and access of all primary data: Zuozhen Tian and Yejia Zhang. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
  52 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Adalimumab in severe and acute sciatica: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Stéphane Genevay; Sebastien Viatte; Axel Finckh; Pascal Zufferey; Federico Balagué; Cem Gabay
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-08

3.  Do mechanical strain and TNF-α interact to amplify pro-inflammatory cytokine production in human annulus fibrosus cells?

Authors:  Morakot Likhitpanichkul; Olivia M Torre; Jadry Gruen; Benjamin A Walter; Andrew C Hecht; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Regulation of inflammation and tumorigenesis by the TIPE family of phospholipid transfer proteins.

Authors:  Jason R Goldsmith; Youhai H Chen
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.530

5.  Epidural administration of spinal nerves with the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor, etanercept, compared with dexamethasone for treatment of sciatica in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Masayuki Miyagi; Yawara Eguchi; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Nobuyasu Ochiai; Shunji Kishida; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Junichi Nakamura; Yasuchika Aoki; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Gen Arai; Hiroto Kamoda; Miyako Suzuki; Masashi Takaso; Takeo Furuya; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in a Percutaneous Mouse Tail Injury Model.

Authors:  Zuozhen Tian; Xiaoyuan Ma; Miersalijiang Yasen; Robert L Mauck; Ling Qin; Frances S Shofer; Lachlan J Smith; Maurizio Pacifici; Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto; Yejia Zhang
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 7.  Cyclooxygenase enzymes: regulation and function.

Authors:  F A Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.116

8.  The Tnfaip8-PE complex is a novel upstream effector in the anti-autophagic action of insulin.

Authors:  Ji-Soo Kim; Jimin Park; Mi-Sun Kim; Ji-Young Ha; Ye-Won Jang; Dong Hae Shin; Jin H Son
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Oncogenic Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Induced Protein 8 (TNFAIP8).

Authors:  Suryakant Niture; Xialan Dong; Elena Arthur; Uchechukwu Chimeh; Samiksha S Niture; Weifan Zheng; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 vary based on diagnoses in individuals with lumbar intervertebral disc diseases.

Authors:  Kathryn T Weber; D Olivier Alipui; Cristina P Sison; Ona Bloom; Shaheda Quraishi; M Chris Overby; Mitchell Levine; Nadeen O Chahine
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  1 in total

1.  Elevated inflammatory gene expression in intervertebral disc tissues in mice with ADAM8 inactivated.

Authors:  Yejia Zhang; Zuozhen Tian; David Gerard; Lutian Yao; Frances S Shofer; Gabriella Cs-Szabo; Ling Qin; Maurizio Pacifici; Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.