| Literature DB >> 32613132 |
Nathalie Peña-García1, Irene Gil-Saura2, Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela3, José Ribamar Siqueira-Junior4.
Abstract
This article aims to explore the key factors on e-commerce adoption from elements of social psychology, such as attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, ease of use and perceived usefulness, introducing the study of non-traditional elements like buying impulse, compatibility, and self-efficacy in online stores, contrasting relationships in a cross-cultural environment. The proposed model is tested from quantitative research with a sample of 584 online consumers in Colombia and Spain. The following statistical analyses were conducted: CFA, structural equations, measurement instrument invariance, and multi-group analysis with EQS 6.3 software. The study reveals that self-efficacy in online stores is a key factor in adopting electronic commerce above the cultures studied. Also, there is significant evidence that proves the moderating effect of national culture on several relationships of the model proposed. Results highlight the importance of national culture to understand impulsive buying behavior. The article presents several considerations toward the main elements to generate online purchase intention among consumers in an emerging country and finds substantial differences with consumers in a developed country. Practical implications are made for companies to adopt online channels and expand internationally.Entities:
Keywords: Business; Colombia; Consumer attitude; Cross-cultural study; Decision analysis; Marketing; Online purchase intention; Purchase behavior; Spain; Technology adoption; Technology management
Year: 2020 PMID: 32613132 PMCID: PMC7322128 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
6D Model: Colombia vs. Spain.
| Dimension | Colombia | Spain | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power distance | 57 | 57 | 10 |
| Individualism | 13 | 51 | |
| Masculinity | 64 | 42 | 22 |
| Uncertain aversion | 80 | 86 | 6 |
| Long-term orientation | 13 | 48 | |
| Indulgence | 83 | 44 |
Source: Hofstede et al. (2010).
Delta > 30.
Figure 1Cultural map - WVS wave 6 (2010–2014). Source: (Inglehart et al., 2014).
Figure 2Model research.
Demographic information of the sample.
| Variable | Items | Colombia | Spain | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
| Gender | Male | 139 | 47.9 | 148 | 50.3 |
| Female | 151 | 52.1 | 146 | 49.7 | |
| Age | 18–25 years old | 72 | 24.8 | 271 | 92.2 |
| 26–39 years old | 171 | 59.0 | 23 | 7.8 | |
| 40–49 years old | 39 | 13.4 | 0 | 0 | |
| 50–59 years old | 6 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | |
| >60 years old | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Internet Experience | <6 months | 8 | 2.8 | 1 | 0.3 |
| 6–11 months | 86 | 29.7 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1–3 years | 69 | 23.8 | 5 | 1.7 | |
| 4–6 years | 42 | 14.5 | 43 | 14.6 | |
| >7 years | 85 | 29.3 | 245 | 83.3 | |
Reliability and validity of the model – Colombian sample.
| PIIT | IMP | AUT | ATT | NS | CP | COM | EOU | PU | INT | CR | AVE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIIT | 0.867 | 0.685 | ||||||||||
| IMP | 0.104 | 0.874 | 0.699 | |||||||||
| AUT | 0.511 | -0.067 | 0.911 | 0.721 | ||||||||
| ATT | 0.505 | 0.149 | 0.447 | 0.907 | 0.764 | |||||||
| NS | 0.309 | 0.217 | 0.088 | 0.571 | 0.949 | 0.861 | ||||||
| CP | 0.473 | 0.076 | 0.709 | 0.568 | 0.229 | 0.902 | 0.756 | |||||
| COM | 0.420 | 0.190 | 0.354 | 0.802 | 0.549 | 0.553 | 0.918 | 0.789 | ||||
| EOU | 0.313 | 0.081 | 0.505 | 0.471 | 0.171 | 0.641 | 0.457 | 0.914 | 0.706 | |||
| PU | 0.418 | 0.117 | 0.439 | 0.675 | 0.487 | 0.504 | 0.649 | 0.442 | 0.876 | 0.775 | ||
| INT | 0.460 | 0.132 | 0.571 | 0.761 | 0.478 | 0.644 | 0.752 | 0.522 | 0.798 | 0.912 | 0.780 |
Note: The diagonal indicates the square root of the AVE (discriminant validity). The data in the lower triangle correspond to the correlations between the factors. CR: composite reliability. AVE: average variance extracted. Delta > 30.
Reliability and validity of the model – Spanish sample.
| PIIT | IMP | AUT | ATT | NS | CP | COM | EOU | PU | INT | CR | AVE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIIT | 0.694 | 0.493 | ||||||||||
| IMP | 0.136 | 0.915 | 0.784 | |||||||||
| AUT | 0.009 | -0.147 | 0.822 | 0.536 | ||||||||
| ATT | 0.211 | 0.266 | 0.272 | 0.896 | 0.741 | |||||||
| NS | 0.127 | 0.387 | -0.010 | 0.372 | 0.918 | 0.788 | ||||||
| CP | 0.190 | -0.036 | 0.570 | 0.402 | 0.087 | 0.845 | 0.647 | |||||
| COM | 0.109 | 0.111 | 0.400 | 0.435 | 0.211 | 0.351 | 0.894 | 0.739 | ||||
| EOU | 0.149 | -0.040 | 0.620 | 0.375 | 0.068 | 0.702 | 0.430 | 0.814 | 0.594 | |||
| PU | 0.066 | 0.070 | 0.355 | 0.482 | 0.160 | 0.271 | 0.449 | 0.306 | 0.870 | 0.691 | ||
| INT | 0.149 | 0.011 | 0.303 | 0.574 | 0.185 | 0.433 | 0.400 | 0.456 | 0.447 | 0.830 | 0.620 |
Note: The diagonal indicates the square root of the AVE (discriminant validity). The data in the lower triangle correspond to the correlations between the factors. CR: composite reliability. AVE: average variance extracted. Delta > 30.
Measure invariance test.
| Single group solutions | X2 | df | RMSEA | SRMR | NFI | NNFI | CFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colombia (n = 290) | 701.757 | 409 | 0.050 | 0.035 | 0.915 | 0.954 | 0.962 |
| Spain (n = 294) | 655.929 | 409 | 0.046 | 0.042 | 0.884 | 0.942 | 0.952 |
| Equal form | 1357.700 | 818 | 0.048 | 0.038 | 0.902 | 0.949 | 0.958 |
| Equal factor loading | 1463.240 | 844 | 0.050 | 0.161 | 0.894 | 0.943 | 0.952 |
Results of SEM analysis and Multi-group analysis.
| H | Relationship | Colombia | Spain | ‡Δpath | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | β | ||||||
| H1 | Online purchase intention → Actual purchase | -0.015 | 0.245 | -0.159∗ | 2.484 | 0.144∗ | 0.05 |
| H2 | Attitude → online purchase intention | 0.195∗ | 3.997 | 0.373∗ | 5.823 | 0.178∗ | 0.99 |
| H3 | Subjective norms → online purchase intention | 0.046 | 0.666 | 0.011 | 0.207 | 0.035 | 0.35 |
| H4 | PBC → online purchase intention | 0.227∗ | 3.041 | 0.173∗ | 2.358 | 0.054 | 0.31 |
| H5 | Self-efficacy in online stores → Online purchase intention | 0.191∗ | 2.539 | 0.037 | 0.629 | 0.154∗ | 0.05 |
| H6 | EOU → attitude | -0.050 | 0.667 | 0.221∗ | 3.655 | 0.270∗ | 0.99 |
| H7 | Perceived usefulness → attitude | 0.500∗ | 9.215 | 0.341∗ | 4.941 | 0.158∗ | 0.04 |
| H8 | Buying impulse → Online purchase intention | 0.103∗ | 1.791 | -0.092 | 2.032 | 0.123∗∗ | 0.08 |
| H9 | EOU → buying impulse | 0.095 | 1.506 | -0.029 | 0.452 | 0.502∗ | 0.00 |
| H10 | Compatibility → Online purchase intention | 0.265∗ | 3.329 | 0.129∗ | 2.349 | 0.136∗∗ | 0.08 |
| H11 | PIIT → online purchase intention | -0.057 | 1.147 | -0.013 | 0.130 | 0.045 | 0.643 |
‡X2(df=893) = 1792.708; RMSEA (CI:90%) = 0.059 (0.055–0.063); CFI = 0.930; NNFI = 0.922.
∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.10.
| Factor | Items |
|---|---|
| PIIT | If I hear about a new technology, I will find a way to interact with it |
| Among my peers, I'm usually the first to try a new technology∗ | |
| In general, I am reluctant to try new information technologies (r) | |
| I like to experiment with new information technologies | |
| Buying Impulse | “Just do it” describes the way I shop∗ |
| I often buy things without thinking about it | |
| “I see it, I buy it” describes me | |
| “Buy now, think later” describes me | |
| Self-efficacy | I can get to a specific website with a browser |
| I could easily use the Web to find information about products or services | |
| I feel comfortable searching the Internet for myself | |
| I would be able to use the Web by myself to find online stores | |
| If I wanted to, I would be able to buy in an online store in the next 30 days∗ | |
| If I wanted to, I'm sure I could buy from an online store in the next 30 days∗ | |
| Attitude | Buying in an online store is attractive |
| I like to buy in online stores | |
| Buying in online stores is a good idea | |
| Subjective norms | People who are important to me, believe I should buy from online stores |
| People who influence me, think I should buy in online stores | |
| People whose opinions are valuable for me, would rather I buy in online stores | |
| Perceived control behavior | I would be able to use Internet for online shopping |
| Using Internet to purchase online is entirely under my control | |
| I have the resources, knowledge and skills to purchase online | |
| Compatibility | Buying in an online store would be compatible with every aspect of my life |
| I think buying from an online store fits well with the way I like to buy | |
| Buying in an online store is compatible with my current situation | |
| Buying in an online store fit with my lifestyle∗ | |
| Ease of use | My interaction with online stores is clear and understandable |
| Interacting with an online store does not require a big mental effort | |
| I think online stores are easy to use | |
| Perceived usefulness | Online stores improve my performance in search and purchase of products/services |
| Online stores allow me to search and buy faster products/services | |
| Online stores improve my effectiveness when buying | |
| Online stores increase my productivity in the search and purchase of products/services | |
| Online purchase intention | If the opportunity arises, I intend to buy from online stores |
| If given the chance, I can predict what I should buy from an online store in the future | |
| I am likely to transact with an online store soon | |
| Purchase behavior | How often do you buy online? |
∗Items were dropped during CFA analyses to improve fit indices.
Data available (Peña García et al., 2020).