| Literature DB >> 32613130 |
Chijioke Christopher Ikeagwuani1, Donald Chimobi Nwonu1, Chiagoziem Kanayo Ugwu1, Chukwudi Cajethan Agu1.
Abstract
The need for developing sustainable cement-based materials is crucial for the prevention of environmental degradation and promotion of sustainable technologies. In the present study, a sustainable cement-based material was developed for sandcrete block production using coconut shell ash (CSA). The product development was executed using the Taguchi robust design approach, in which an L18 mixed level orthogonal array was adopted. The process parameters investigated were the end-web to center-web (E/C) ratio of the sandcrete block, water-cement (W/C) ratio and CSA content. The evaluated responses include the compressive strength (CS), bulk density (BD) and water absorption (WA). The result obtained showed that for the CS, all the process parameters had a statistically significant effect at 0.05 alpha level, while only the W/C ratio had a statistically significant effect on the BD and WA. The optimal settings of the process parameters for CS and BD were obtained at E/C ratio of 1:2, W/C ratio of 0.65 and CSA content of 5% while that for WA was obtained at E/C ratio of 1:1, W/C ratio of 0.65 and CSA content of 20%. The developed sandcrete blocks are suitable for load-bearing masonry units and areas with moisture exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Bulk density; Cement; Cement additive; Civil engineering; Compressive strength; Concrete technology; Construction engineering; Optimization; Sandcrete blocks; Taguchi approach; Water absorption
Year: 2020 PMID: 32613130 PMCID: PMC7322058 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Physical properties of fine aggregate.
| S/N | Properties | Values |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Specific gravity | 2.61 |
| 2 | Water absorption, % | 2.52 |
| 3 | Fine materials, % (<75μm) | 2% |
| 4 | Fineness modulus | 2.76 |
Figure 1Particle size distribution curve of sand.
Chemical composition of materials.
| Element oxide | PLC (%) | CSA (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Silica (SiO2) | 10.31 | 43.5 |
| Iron oxide (Fe2O3) | 6.22 | 12.6 |
| Alumina (Al2O3) | 2.41 | 15.2 |
| Phosphorous oxide (P2O5) | - | 0.4 |
| Soda (Na2O) | 0.001 | 0.47 |
| Potash (K2O) | - | 8.49 |
| Lime (CaO) | 78.35 | 3.25 |
| Magnesia (MgO) | 0.003 | 5.01 |
| Titanium oxide (TiO2) | 0.3 | - |
| Magnesium oxide (MnO) | 0.06 | 0.19 |
| SO3 | 0.9 | - |
| CuO | 0.02 | - |
| ZnO | - | 0.5 |
| SrO | 0.03 | - |
| ZrO2 | 0.004 | - |
| Co3O4 | 0.004 | - |
| HgO | 0.12 | - |
| Loss on ignition | 1.268 | 10.39 |
Figure 2Burnt coconut shell.
Process parameters with their various levels.
| S/N | Process parameters | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 1 | E/C ratio | 1:2 | 1:1 | - |
| 2 | W/C ratio | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.65 |
| 3 | CSA | 5 | 10 | 15 |
Layout of the orthogonal array.
| S/N | Actual values | Coded values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/C ratio | W/C (%) | CSA | A | B | C | |
| 1 | 1:2 | 0.55 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 1:2 | 0.55 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 1:2 | 0.55 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 4 | 1:2 | 0.60 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | 1:2 | 0.60 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 6 | 1:2 | 0.60 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 7 | 1:2 | 0.65 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 8 | 1:2 | 0.65 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 9 | 1:2 | 0.65 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 10 | 1:1 | 0.55 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 11 | 1:1 | 0.55 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 12 | 1:1 | 0.55 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 13 | 1:1 | 0.60 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 14 | 1:1 | 0.60 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 15 | 1:1 | 0.60 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 16 | 1:1 | 0.65 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 17 | 1:1 | 0.65 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 18 | 1:1 | 0.65 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the moulds: (A) mould with end-web to centre-web ratio of 1:1; (B) mould with end-web to centre-web ratio of 1:2.
Figure 4Fabricated moulds: (a) mould with end-web to centre-web ratio of 1:1; (b) mould with end-web to centre-web ratio of 1:2.
Figure 5Freshly prepared hollow sandcrete blocks.
Summary of laboratory results performed with the Taguchi designed experiment.
| S/N | Process parameter | CS (N/mm2) | S/N ratio (dB) | BD (kg/m3) | S/N ratio (dB) | WA (%) | S/N ratio (dB) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.56 | 10.98 | 2025.24 | 66.1223 | 14.4 | 23.21 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3.26 | 10.21 | 1945.60 | 65.7720 | 14.7 | 23.38 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2.96 | 9.42 | 1884.92 | 65.5045 | 15.9 | 24.05 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3.63 | 11.19 | 2017.66 | 66.0966 | 11.5 | 21.19 |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3.48 | 10.82 | 1881.13 | 65.4876 | 15.7 | 23.72 |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3.56 | 10.98 | 1934.22 | 65.7301 | 14.0 | 22.72 |
| 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4.07 | 12.19 | 2093.51 | 66.4165 | 13.0 | 22.70 |
| 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4.00 | 12.01 | 1964.56 | 65.8649 | 14.3 | 23.13 |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3.56 | 10.98 | 2059.38 | 66.2745 | 10.0 | 19.72 |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3.41 | 10.64 | 1938.44 | 65.7480 | 13.0 | 21.83 |
| 11 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.96 | 9.42 | 1917.37 | 65.6541 | 13.0 | 22.06 |
| 12 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2.74 | 8.74 | 1797.97 | 65.0904 | 16.0 | 24.08 |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3.48 | 10.75 | 1875.23 | 65.4603 | 14.3 | 23.13 |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.81 | 8.97 | 1994.62 | 65.9952 | 11.3 | 21.14 |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2.74 | 8.74 | 2019.20 | 66.1035 | 11.3 | 21.09 |
| 16 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.33 | 10.42 | 2005.16 | 66.0357 | 11.0 | 20.85 |
| 17 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3.93 | 11.87 | 2036.76 | 66.1768 | 10.3 | 19.41 |
| 18 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3.56 | 10.98 | 1994.62 | 65.9808 | 10.1 | 20.03 |
Figure 6Parameter effect on the mean CS.
Figure 7Parameter effect on the mean S/N ratio for the CS.
Parameter effects on the CS and Taguchi S/N ratio.
| Level | CS (kN/m2) | Taguchi η (dB) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Parameter | |||||
| A | B | C | A | B | C | |
| 1 | 3.564∗ | 3.148 | 3.580∗ | 10.978∗ | 9.901 | 11.028∗ |
| 2 | 3.218 | 3.284 | 3.407 | 10.058 | 10.242 | 10.551 |
| 3 | - | 3.741∗ | 3.185 | - | 11.410∗ | 9.975 |
| Δ | 0.346 | 0.593 | 0.395 | 0.919 | 1.509 | 1.053 |
| Rank | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Key: Δ represents the difference between maximum and minimum values of the responses.
∗ represents the optimum level.
ANOVA for CS S/N ratio.
| Process parameter | DOF | SS | V | F-ratio | p-value | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/C ratio | 1 | 3.804 | 3.804 | 9.253 | 0.010 | 19.4 |
| W/C ratio | 2 | 7.517 | 3.758 | 9.143 | 0.004 | 38.4 |
| CSA | 2 | 3.336 | 1.668 | 4.058 | 0.045 | 17.0 |
| Error | 12 | 4.933 | 0.411 | 25.2 | ||
| Total | 17 | 19.590 | 100.0 |
Optimal level values for the CS.
| Process parameter | Level | CS value (kN/m2) | S/N response value (dB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 3.564 | 10.978 |
| B | 3 | 3.741 | 11.410 |
| C | 1 | 3.580 | 11.028 |
Figure 8Parameter effect on the mean BD.
Figure 9Parameter effect on the mean S/N ratio for the BD.
Parameter effects on the BD and Taguchi S/N ratio.
| Level | BD (kN/m3) | Taguchi η (dB) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Parameter | |||||
| A | B | C | A | B | C | |
| 1 | 1978∗ | 1918 | 1993∗ | 65.92∗ | 65.65 | 65.98∗ |
| 2 | 1953 | 1954 | 1957 | 65.80 | 65.81 | 65.83 |
| 3 | 2026∗ | 1948 | 66.12∗ | 65.78 | ||
| Δ | 25 | 107 | 44 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 0.20 |
| Rank | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Key: Δ represents the difference between maximum and minimum values of the responses.
∗ represents the optimum level.
ANOVA for BD S/N ratio.
| Process parameter | DOF | SS | V | F-ratio | p-value | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/C ratio | 1 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.676 | 0.427 | 3.0 |
| W/C ratio | 2 | 0.703 | 0.351 | 4.079 | 0.045 | 36.5 |
| CSA | 2 | 0.131 | 0.066 | 0.762 | 0.488 | 6.8 |
| Error | 12 | 4.933 | 0.086 | 53.7 | ||
| Total | 17 | 19.590 | 100.0 |
Optimal level values for the BD.
| Process parameter | Level | BD value (kg/m3) | S/N response value (dB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 1978 | 65.92 |
| B | 3 | 2026 | 66.12 |
| C | 1 | 1993 | 65.98 |
Figure 10Parameter effect on the mean WA.
Figure 11Parameter effect on the mean S/N ratio for the WA.
Parameter effects on the WA and Taguchi S/N ratio.
| Level | WA (%) | Taguchi η (dB) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Parameter | |||||
| A | B | C | A | B | C | |
| 1 | 13.62 | 14.34 | 12.7722 | -22.65 | -23.10 | -22.15 |
| 2 | 12.04∗ | 12.91 | 12.9444 | -21.51∗ | -22.17 | -22.14 |
| 3 | - | 11.23∗ | 12.7667∗ | - | -20.97∗ | -21.95∗ |
| Δ | 1.58 | 3.11 | 0.18 | 1.13 | 2.13 | 0.20 |
| Rank | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Key: Δ represents the difference between maximum and minimum values of the responses.
∗ represents the optimum level.
ANOVA for WA S/N ratio.
| Process parameter | DOF | SS | V | F-ratio | p-value | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E/C ratio | 1 | 5.766 | 5.766 | 3.825 | 0.074 | 15.3 |
| W/C ratio | 2 | 13.667 | 6.834 | 4.534 | 0.034 | 36.3 |
| CSA | 2 | 0.157 | 0.079 | 0.052 | 0.949 | 0.4 |
| Error | 12 | 18.088 | 1.507 | 48 | ||
| Total | 17 | 37.678 | 100 |
Optimal level values for the WA.
| Process parameter | Level | WA (%) | S/N response value (dB) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | 12.04 | -21.51 |
| B | 3 | 11.23 | -20.97 |
| C | 3 | 12.7667 | -21.95 |