| Literature DB >> 32612333 |
Radhakrishnan Govindan1, John V S Kommu2, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of behavioral problems among children in India necessitates newer ways of managing them with medical and nonmedical approaches. Music add-on therapy is a method for treating mental disturbances. This study examines the effectiveness of music add-on therapy in managing children with behavioral problems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A randomized controlled design was adopted with a random allocation of 40 children (20 each in experimental and control groups) aged between 6 and 12 years with behavioral disorders as per the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD)-10. After the pretest, both the groups received treatment as usual (TAU), while the experimental group alone additionally received music add-on intervention with eight Hindustani ragas for 3 weeks. As clinical outcome measures, we used the Childrens Global Assessment Scale, Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form typical IQ (NCBRF-TIQ) version, and visual analogue scale (VAS) for a parent to monitor the behavioral improvement.Entities:
Keywords: Behavioral; child; music; nurse; therapy; •NIMAT is an effective alternative, complementary method to manage children with behavioral problems along with the regular treatment implemented by the nurses.; •Nurse Implemented Music Add-on Therapy (NIMAT) was effective in improving positive social behavior and reducing problem behaviors among children with a behavioral problem.
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612333 PMCID: PMC7320726 DOI: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_240_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Psychol Med ISSN: 0253-7176
Distribution of socio-demographic profile by study groups
| Socio-demographic Variables | Experimental Group ( | Control Group ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (in years)* | 9.00 (1.75) | 8.00 (2.41) |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 19 (95) | 12 (60) |
| Female | 01 (05) | 08 (40) |
| School | ||
| Attending | 16 (80) | 13 (65) |
| Not attending | 04 (20) | 07 (35) |
| Type of School | ||
| Play School | 01 (05) | 04 (20) |
| Regular School | 18 (90) | 12 (60) |
| Special School | 01 (05) | 04 (20) |
| Monthly Family Income (Rs) | ||
| <10,000 | 06 (30) | 02 (10) |
| 10,001-50,000 | 08 (40) | 16 (80) |
| 50,001-1,00,000 | 04 (20) | 02 (10) |
| More than 1,00,000 | 02 (10) | 00 (00) |
| Socio- economic Status | ||
| Low | 03 (15) | 02 (10) |
| Middle | 12 (60) | 17 (85) |
| Upper | 05 (25) | 01 (05) |
| Domicile | ||
| Urban | 12 (60) | 14 (70) |
| Rural | 08 (40) | 06 (30) |
| Living Arrangements | ||
| Living with parents | 18 (90) | 20 (100) |
| Living with relatives or caregivers | 02 (10) | 00 (00) |
| Type of Family | ||
| Nuclear | 08 (40) | 16 (80) |
| Joint | 11 (55) | 04 (20) |
| Extended | 01 (05) | 00 (00) |
| Type of Marriage | ||
| Consanguineous | 01 (05) | 02 (10) |
| Nonconsanguineous | 19 (95) | 18 (90) |
*Mean (Standard deviation)
Distribution of clinical profile by study groups
| Diagnosis | Experimental Group ( | Control Group ( |
|---|---|---|
| ADHD | 20 (100) | 19 (95) |
| ODD | 01 (05) | 04 (20) |
| CD | 00 (00) | 01 (05) |
| Provisional diagnosis during admission | ||
| Emotional Disorder | 03 (15) | 00 (00) |
| Tic Disorder | 03 (15) | 00 (00) |
| Epilepsy | 01 (05) | 02 (10) |
| OCD | 01 (05) | 00 (00) |
| Others | 02 (10) | 00 (00) |
ADHD – Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder, ODD – Oppositional defiant disorder, CD – Conduct disorder, OCD – Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Assessment of Global functioning of the children through CGAS and parent VAS
| Measure | Group | Mean (SD) | Partial Eta Squared | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest O-1 | Post Test 1 O-2 | Post Test 2 O-3 | |||||
| CGAS | Experimental Group ( | 37.0 (13.3) | 45.0 (12.18) | 58.1 (10.15) | 34.307 | <0.001 | 0.474 |
| Control Group ( | 30.0 (17.28) | 29.95 (16.31) | 32.90 (14.33) | ||||
| VAS | Experimental Group ( | 1.40 (1.09) | 3.60 (1.66) | 5.60 (1.78) | 72.353 | <0.001 | - |
| Control Group ( | 1.15 (0.48) | 2.05 (0.94) | 2.55 (1.05) | ||||
CGAS – Children Global Assessment Scale, VAS – Visual analogue scale, SD – Standard deviation
Figure 1Graphical representation of global functioning of the children through the children global assessment scale
Figure 2Graphical representation of behavioral improvements through parent visual analogue scale
Assessment of children behavior through NCBRF-TIQ version
| Domains | Group | Mean (SD) | Partial Eta Squared | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest O-1 | Post Test 1 O-2 | Post Test 2 O-3 | |||||
| D1 (Positive social behavior) | Experimental Group ( | 8.15 (4.69) | 10.20 (5.79) | 15.95 (6.63) | 13.089 | <0.00 | 0.256 |
| Control Group ( | 4.65 (4.79) | 6.85 (5.36) | 7.65 (5.01) | 1 | |||
| D2 (Disruptive Behavior) | Experimental Group ( | 35.6 (13.73) | 24.8 (12.97) | 17.3 (10.88) | 16.512 | <0.00 | 0.303 |
| D-Total | Control Group ( | 28.7 (18.06) | 25.65 (15.54) | 22.0 (12.70) | 1 | ||
| D2 (Hyperactivity and Inattention) | Experimental Group ( | 22.60 (6.45) | 16.65 (6.45) | 14.05 (6.88) | 12.534 | <0.001 | 0.248 |
| ADHD-Total | Control Group ( | 24.60 (5.11) | 23.50 (4.81) | 21.75 (4.43) | |||
NCBRF-TIQ – Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form typical IQ, SD – Standard deviation, ADHD – Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Figure 3Graphical representation of Nisonger-D1: Positive Social Behavior
Figure 4Graphical representation of Nisonger-D2: Disruptive Behavior Subscale Scores (D-Total)
Figure 5Graphical representation of Nisonger-D2: Hyperactivity and Inattention Subscale Scores (ADHD-TOTAL)