| Literature DB >> 32612095 |
Nastasia Mukharamova1, Sergey Lazarev1,2, Janne-Mieke Meijer3,4, Oleg Yu Gorobtsov1,5, Andrej Singer6,5, Matthieu Chollet7, Michael Bussmann8,9, Dmitry Dzhigaev1,10, Yiping Feng7, Marco Garten8,11, Axel Huebl8,11,12, Thomas Kluge8, Ruslan P Kurta1,13, Vladimir Lipp14, Robin Santra14,15, Marcin Sikorski7,13, Sanghoon Song7, Garth Williams7,16, Diling Zhu7, Beata Ziaja-Motyka14,17, Thomas E Cowan8,11, Andrei V Petukhov3,18, Ivan A Vartanyants19,20.
Abstract
With the rapid development of short-pulse intense laser sources, studies of matter under extreme irradiation conditions enter further unexplored regimes. In addition, an application of X-ray Free-Electron Lasers (XFELs) delivering intense femtosecond X-ray pulses, allows to investigate sample evolution in IR pump - X-ray probe experiments with an unprecedented time resolution. Here we present a detailed study of the periodic plasma created from the colloidal crystal. Both experimental data and theory modeling show that the periodicity in the sample survives to a large extent the extreme excitation and shock wave propagation inside the colloidal crystal. This feature enables probing the excited crystal, using the powerful Bragg peak analysis, in contrast to the conventional studies of dense plasma created from bulk samples for which probing with Bragg diffraction technique is not possible. X-ray diffraction measurements of excited colloidal crystals may then lead towards a better understanding of matter phase transitions under extreme irradiation conditions.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612095 PMCID: PMC7329833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67214-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Results of the experimental data analysis. IR laser parameters and the results of the Bragg peaks evaluation giving characteristic times for the integrated intensity and the size of the Bragg peaks in radial and azimuthal directions as a function of IR intensity (see Fig. 2).
| Intensity, 1014 W/cm2 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 6.3 |
| Laser fluence, J/cm2 | 16 | 25.5 | 33.6 |
| Short times of intensity change, ps | — | 3 ± 10 | 7.9 ± 1.1 |
| Long times of intensity change, ps | 299 ± 33 | 300 ± 28 | 275 ± 28 |
| Times of radial peaks FWHM change, ps | 302 ± 32 | 279 ± 50 | 425 ± 90 |
| Times of azimuthal peaks FWHM change, ps | 345 ± 235 | 353 ± 86 | 410 ± 78 |
Figure 2Time dependence of the relative change of the integrated intensity of the Bragg peaks (a–c) and their widths in the radial (d–f) and azimuthal (g–i) directions at three measured IR laser intensities. Black (blue) dots are experimental data corresponding to 25.25 ps (6.5 ps) time delay increment and solid red lines are exponential fits.
Figure 1Scheme of the pump-probe experiment. XFEL pulses generated by the undulator are monochromatized by the diamond crystals and focused by the compound refractive lenses (not shown) to the size of 50 μm at the sample position. CSPAD detector is positioned 10 m downstream from the colloidal sample. Evolution of diffraction patterns as a function of time delay between the IR pump laser and X-ray probe laser is shown on the right. Insets (a–d) visualize three-stage model of the IR laser-matter interaction. The colloidal particles are shown as circles. The color of the particles corresponds to the temperature of the colloidal crystal - red is plasma and blue is the cold material. The incoming IR laser pulse is pointing in the direction of the pulse propagation. Initially, the IR laser pulse is propagating towards the colloidal crystal sample and after interaction with the sample it is reflected by the created plasma on the top layer of the colloidal crystal. The top surface level of the initial colloidal crystal is marked by the black dashed line in (d).
Figure 3Electron energy density distribution in the colloidal crystal at 80 fs (a–c) and 1 ps (d–f) after the start of the IR laser pulse propagation for three different IR laser intensities. The IR laser pulse is coming from the top along the z− direction. Here, we show a projection of the electron energy density along the y-direction.
Results of the plasma and shock wave simulations. Maximum electron energy density was obtained from the PIConGPU simulations. Ablation depth, shock wave parameters, and maximum mass velocity were obtained from the HELIOS simulations.
| Intensity, 1014 W/cm2 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 6.3 |
| Maximum electron energy density at 80 fs (see Fig. | 49 | 98 | 149 |
| Maximum electron energy density at 1 ps (see Fig. | 12 | 20 | 25 |
| Ablation depth at 1 ns (see Fig. | 180 | 280 | 450 |
| Shock wave stop times (see Fig. | 437 | 756 | 931 |
| Shock wave depth at the stop time (see Fig. | 2.36 | 4.15 | 5.00 |
| Maximum mass velocity (see Fig. S11), km/s | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
Figure 4Time (a) and depth (b) dependencies of the electron energy density for three measured intensities I1 = 3.0 · 1014 W/cm2, I2 = 4.8 · 1014 W/cm2 and I3 = 6.3 · 1014 W/cm2. Time dependencies of the electron energy density are shown at the depth of 75 nm from the top of the sample that corresponds to the center of colloidal particles in the first surface layer. Electron energy density-depth dependence is shown at 1 ps after the start of interaction with the IR laser pulse.
Figure 5Hydrodynamic simulations of the shock wave propagation. Color plots show simulation results for the pressure (a–c) and mass density (d–f) for three different IR laser intensities: (a,d) I1 = 3.0 · 1014 W/cm2, (b,e) I2 = 4.8 · 1014 W/cm2, (c,f) I3 = 6.3 · 1014 W/cm2.