Literature DB >> 32611705

The Genotoxin Colibactin Shapes Gut Microbiota in Mice.

Sophie Tronnet1, Pauline Floch1,2, Laetitia Lucarelli1, Matteo Serino3, Eric Oswald3,2, Deborah Gaillard1, Patricia Martin1.   

Abstract

The genotoxin colibactin produced by resident bacteria of the gut microbiota may have tumorigenic effect by inducing DNA double-strand breaks in host cells. Yet, the effect of colibactin on gut microbiota composition and functions remains unknown. To address this point, we designed an experiment in which pregnant mice were colonized with the following: (i) a commensal Escherichia coli strain, (ii) a commensal E. coli strain plus a genotoxic E. coli strain, (iii) a commensal E. coli strain plus a nongenotoxic E. coli mutant strain unable to produce mature colibactin. Then, we analyzed the gut microbiota in pups at day 15 and day 35 after birth. At day 15, mice that were colonized at birth with the genotoxic strain showed lower levels of Proteobacteria and taxa belonging to the Proteobacteria, a modest effect on overall microbial diversity, and no effect on gut microbiome. At day 35, mice that received the genotoxic strain showed lower Firmicutes and taxa belonging to the Firmicutes, together with a strong effect on overall microbial diversity and higher microbial functions related to DNA repair. Moreover, the genotoxic strain strongly affected gut microbial diversity evolution of pups receiving the genotoxic strain between day 15 and day 35. Our data show that colibactin, beyond targeting the host, may also exert its genotoxic effect on the gut microbiota.IMPORTANCE Infections of genotoxic Escherichia coli spread concomitantly with urbanized progression. These bacteria may prompt cell senescence and affect DNA stability, inducing cancer via the production of colibactin, a genotoxin shown capable of affecting host DNA in eukaryotic cells. In this study, we show that the action of colibactin may also be directed against other bacteria of the gut microbiota in which genotoxic E. coli bacteria have been introduced. Indeed, the presence of genotoxic E. coli induced a change in both the structure and function of the gut microbiota. Our data indicate that genotoxic E. coli may use colibactin to compete for gut niche utilization.
Copyright © 2020 Tronnet et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colibactin; enterobacteria; gut microbiota dysbiosis; microbiome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32611705      PMCID: PMC7333578          DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00589-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSphere        ISSN: 2379-5042            Impact factor:   4.389


INTRODUCTION

The quantitative and qualitative alterations, named dysbiosis, of the gut microbiota are now considered key traits of multiple pathologies such as metabolic, inflammatory, and infectious diseases (1). Dysbioses can originate from several factors related to multiple habits with antibiotic abuse being among the most important. However, an increased fat-to-fiber alimentary ratio, which is a common inducer of metabolic diseases, represents the strongest trigger of gut microbiota alterations. In this context, it was shown that a high-fat/high-sucrose diet was able to increase the intestinal adherence of adherent invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) in mice, thus promoting AIEC infection (2). Both proinflammatory and genotoxic strains belong to E. coli, which is a dominant member of the phylum Proteobacteria and colonizes the guts of both humans and animals at birth (3). Only 40% of the whole genome of E. coli is conserved, which confers a huge molecular plasticity to these bacteria. The plasticity is characterized by the acquisition of mobile elements such as plasmids, transposons, phages, and pathogenicity islands (4). Genotoxic E. coli bacteria harbor in their genome a 52-kb polyketide synthase (pks) pathogenicity island with genes encoding a complex enzymatic machinery synthesizing the genotoxin colibactin. The B2 phylogenetic group of E. coli is the group harboring the most (30%) of pks+ E. coli strains. The prevalence of the B2 group increased dramatically in the last decades and concomitantly with the progression of urbanization (5) and both autoimmune and allergic diseases (6). This event induced a progressive passage from phylogenetic group A (with no pks+ E. coli strains) to phylogroup B2. Colibactin is capable of inducing DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic cells (7) and of generating DNA interstrand cross-links (8) and was shown to induce multiple alterations in the host such as cell senescence (9, 10), increased E. coli-induced lymphopenia (11), altered intestinal homeostasis (12), modified tumor microenvironment (13), and colon tumor growth (9). Yet, whether colibactin may exert its genotoxic effect even on members of the gut microbiota remains unknown. To address this point, we set up a model of mother-to-pup vertical transmission of both genotoxic and nongenotoxic E. coli, since these strains are already present at birth (3). We studied the effects on both gut microbiota and microbiome on pups at day 15 and 35 after birth. Beyond colibactin, pks island genes are involved in the synthesis of multiple factors such as bacterial analgesic lipopeptide (14) and antibiotic molecules such as siderophore-microcins (15). Given the strong importance of the mother as an E. coli transmitting factor (16), to obtain mouse pups colonized by E. coli the most natural way, we decided to colonize the mother with the E. coli of interest. Therefore, to ascribe to the sole production of colibactin the putative effects on gut microbiota, we decided not to compare a pks+ versus a pks mutant E. coli strain but, rather, to generate two isogenic bacterial mutants on the basis of the E. coli SP15 strain (11) and to colonize the mother with these mutants.

RESULTS

Colibactin targets the gut microbiota at the onset of intestinal colonization by genotoxic E. coli.

To understand whether the genotoxin colibactin may also target the host gut microbiota beyond the effects observed on host cells (7, 8), we applied a protocol of vertical mother-to-pup transmission (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Briefly, pregnant mothers were given by gavage either a nongenotoxic E. coli commensal strain (MG1655 strain, phylogroup A, control group) or both MG1655 and the genotoxic E. coli SP15 strain (phylogroup B2, SP15clb+) or its nongenotoxic mutant (SP15clb-). The molecular strategy applied to generate the two isogenic E. coli SP15 strains is reported in Fig. S2. We analyzed the overall putative changes in the gut microbiota of mouse pups at 15 days after birth. The mother-to-pup transfer of the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain was associated with a higher relative abundance of Proteobacteria. In contrast, the mother-to-pup transfer of the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain was associated with a higher relative abundance of the family Lachnospiraceae (Fig. 1A). Both the nongenotoxic and the genotoxic E. coli SP15 strains significantly affected the overall gut microbiota profile (Fig. 1B). However, the overall gut microbiota diversity was unaffected, despite the significant reduction in the Menhinick index, regardless of the genotoxicity of the E. coli SP15 strain (Fig. 1C). Then, considering the putative antibiotic activity of colibactin (17), we focused on microbial taxa whose abundance was lower after colonization with the genotoxic E. coli SP15 strain. As reported in Fig. 2A to F, the phylum Proteobacteria and all the other related taxa displayed a significantly lower abundance in mice colonized with the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain compared to the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain. Next, we analyzed the gut microbiome by performing a functional analysis based on PICRUSt (18). As reported in Fig. 3, we identified microbial pathways significantly enriched in the control MG1655_d15 and in the group of mouse pups cocolonized with the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain, but not with the group cocolonized with the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain. Overall, these data show that 15 days after birth, E. coli genotoxic activity exerts an intraspecies taxonomical but not functional impact on the gut microbiota.
FIG 1

Cecum microbiota of mice aged 15 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mice of the same color, according to the enterobacterial strain received at birth. The cladogram shows the taxonomic levels represented by rings with phyla at the innermost ring and genera/species at the outermost ring, and each circle is a bacterial member within that level. All groups of mice have been analyzed, but the cladogram does not show the control group MG1655_d15, meaning this group is not characterized by any higher bacterial taxon compared to the other groups. (B) Principal-component analysis (PCA) showing cluster of groups according to the cecum microbiota (following the color code of the overall figure). The P values compared to the value for the control group (blue) are shown. (C) Heat-map based on Pearson distance and complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices and dot-plot representation of the Menhinick index on the right side (n = 5).*, P < 0.05 versus control group, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05).

FIG 2

Bacterial taxon reduction following colonization at day 15 with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A to F) Phylum to species histogram representation. n = 5. **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05).

FIG 3

Cecum microbiome of mice aged 15 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. List of the bacterial functions enriched in the control group MG1655_d15 (green) or in the MG1655_SP15clb-_d15 group (red) and the related linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (P < 0.01). n = 5. (All groups of mice have been analyzed, but the figure does not show the MG1655_SP15clb+_d15 group, meaning this group is not characterized by any higher bacterial taxon compared to the other groups).

Cecum microbiota of mice aged 15 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mice of the same color, according to the enterobacterial strain received at birth. The cladogram shows the taxonomic levels represented by rings with phyla at the innermost ring and genera/species at the outermost ring, and each circle is a bacterial member within that level. All groups of mice have been analyzed, but the cladogram does not show the control group MG1655_d15, meaning this group is not characterized by any higher bacterial taxon compared to the other groups. (B) Principal-component analysis (PCA) showing cluster of groups according to the cecum microbiota (following the color code of the overall figure). The P values compared to the value for the control group (blue) are shown. (C) Heat-map based on Pearson distance and complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices and dot-plot representation of the Menhinick index on the right side (n = 5).*, P < 0.05 versus control group, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05). Bacterial taxon reduction following colonization at day 15 with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A to F) Phylum to species histogram representation. n = 5. **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001, ****, P < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05). Cecum microbiome of mice aged 15 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. List of the bacterial functions enriched in the control group MG1655_d15 (green) or in the MG1655_SP15clb-_d15 group (red) and the related linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (P < 0.01). n = 5. (All groups of mice have been analyzed, but the figure does not show the MG1655_SP15clb+_d15 group, meaning this group is not characterized by any higher bacterial taxon compared to the other groups). Time line of the experimental protocol employed in the cocolonization model of vertical mother-to-pup transmission. Pregnant Swiss CD1 mothers were received and treated with 5 mg/ml of streptomycin from day −3 to day 0 (birth of pups). At day −1, the pregnant Swiss CD1 mothers were given 109 CFU of the enterobacterial strain or a mix of strains (5 × 108 CFU per strain) by gavage: MG1655 (commensal E. coli strain), genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain, or nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain. All the strains employed in this study are streptomycin resistant. The cecum microbiota was sampled and analyzed on day 15 and day 35 after birth. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 0.5 MB. Molecular strategy used to generate the nongenotoxic and genotoxic E. coli SP15 strains. Molecular details of the pCM17 plasmid used to generate the two isogenic mutants of E. coli SP15 strains. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.1 MB.

Colibactin targets the gut microbiota and microbiome following intestinal colonization by genotoxic E. coli.

Then, to investigate whether the early impact of colibactin had long-lasting consequences on gut microbiota composition, we analyzed the overall putative changes in the gut microbiota of mice 35 days after birth. Unlike what observed above at day 15, coinfection with the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain was associated with a higher relative abundance of Firmicutes. In contrast, the coinfection with the genotoxic SP15clb+ strain was associated with a higher relative abundance of the genus Alistipes and family Rikenellaceae (Fig. 4A). A principal-component analysis (PCA) showed a complete separation between the gut microbiota profile of mice cocolonized with the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain compared to the other groups of mice (Fig. 4B). In addition, the calculation of several diversity indices showed a precise cluster separation among the three gut microbiota profiles, with a generally significantly higher diversity induced by the genotoxic strain compared to the nongenotoxic one, except for the Berger-Parker index (Fig. 4C). As for the reduction in microbial taxa, the phylum Firmicutes and all the other related taxa displayed a significantly lower abundance in mice colonized with the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain compared to the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain (Fig. 5A to F). Next, we analyzed the gut microbiome by performing a functional analysis based on PICRUSt (18). As reported in Fig. 6, we identified microbial pathways significantly enriched in all three groups. In detail, microbial pathways related to replication and repair, DNA repair and recombination, proteins, and DNA replication, among all the pathways identified, were found significantly enriched in the mice cocolonized with the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain.
FIG 4

Cecum microbiota of mice aged 35 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color, according to the enterobacterial strain received at birth. (B) PCA showing clusters of groups according to the cecum microbiota (following the color code of the overall figure). The P values compare the value for the group compared to the value for the genotoxic group (red). (C) Heat-map based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices and dot-plot representation of the Simpson, Chao-1, Margalef, and Fisher-alpha indices on the right side. n = 5. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 versus control group, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05). $, P < 0.05; $$, P < 0.01 between SP15clb- and SP15clb+ groups, Mann-Whitney test.

FIG 5

Bacterial taxon reduction following colonization at day 35 with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A to F) Phylum to species histogram representation. n = 5. ****, P < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05).

FIG 6

Cecum microbiome of mice aged 35 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. List of the bacterial functions enriched in each group and the related linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (P < 0.01). n = 5.

Cecum microbiota of mice aged 35 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color, according to the enterobacterial strain received at birth. (B) PCA showing clusters of groups according to the cecum microbiota (following the color code of the overall figure). The P values compare the value for the group compared to the value for the genotoxic group (red). (C) Heat-map based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices and dot-plot representation of the Simpson, Chao-1, Margalef, and Fisher-alpha indices on the right side. n = 5. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 versus control group, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05). $, P < 0.05; $$, P < 0.01 between SP15clb- and SP15clb+ groups, Mann-Whitney test. Bacterial taxon reduction following colonization at day 35 with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. (A to F) Phylum to species histogram representation. n = 5. ****, P < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05). Cecum microbiome of mice aged 35 days following colonization with genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli. List of the bacterial functions enriched in each group and the related linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (P < 0.01). n = 5. Overall, these data show that 35 days after birth of the mice, E. coli genotoxic activity profoundly affects the gut microbiota of the mouse pups at both a taxonomical and functional level and that it exerts an interspecies impact on the gut microbiota.

Evolution of gut microbiota and microbiome following intestinal colonization by genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli SP15 strain in mice.

Next, we evaluated the effects of the infection with the E. coli strains reported above on the evolution of gut microbiota and microbiome by comparing the two time points at day 15 and day 35 after birth of the mice. On a taxonomical level, mice that received E. coli MG1655 strain displayed increased abundance of the family Lachnospiraceae on day 35 after birth (Fig. S3A); in terms of overall diversity, the infection with E. coli MG1655 did not induce a net separation between the two time points of 15 and 35 days (Fig. S3B), albeit some microbial functions were found significantly enriched (Fig. S3C). Mice that received the nongenotoxic E. coli SP15clb- strain displayed increased abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Deferribacteres at day 35 after birth (Fig. S4A). The overall microbial diversity between the two time points of day 15 and day 35 was not affected (Fig. S4B), albeit some microbial functions were found significantly enriched (Fig. S4C). In contrast, mice that received the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain displayed increased levels of the phyla Deferribacteres and Tenericutes on day 35 after birth (Fig. S5A) and a net microbial diversity separation between the two time points of day 15 and day 35, with cellular processes related to signaling as the identified microbial function found significantly enriched (Fig. S5C). Overall, these data show that the genotoxic E. coli SP15clb+ strain affected the gut microbiota diversity to a greater extent than the other E. coli strains. Fifteen to 35 days after birth, cecum microbiota evolution of mouse pups which received MG1655 E. coli. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. (B) Heat-map based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices. (C) LDA score of the bacterial functions significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. The threshold on the logarithmic LDA score for discriminative features was set at 3.0 (instead of 2.0). n = 5 per group. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.4 MB. Fifteen to 35 days after birth, cecum microbiota evolution of mice which received MG1655 and E. coli SP15clb- strains. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. (B) Heat-map based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices. (C) LDA score of the bacterial functions significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. The threshold on the logarithmic LDA score for discriminative features was set at 3.0 (instead of 2.0). n = 5 per group. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.9 MB. Fifteen to 35 days after birth, cecum microbiota evolution of mice which received MG1655 and E. coli SP15clb+ strains. (A) Cladogram showing bacterial taxa significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. (B) Heat-map based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29) showing multiple diversity indices. (C) LDA score of the bacterial functions significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the group of mouse pups of the same color. The threshold on the logarithmic LDA score for discriminative features was set at 3.0 (instead of 2.0). n = 5 per group. Download FIG S5, TIF file, 1.4 MB.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we report the effects of the genotoxin colibactin on both gut microbiota and microbiome in mouse pups whose mothers had been colonized with either a genotoxic or nongenotoxic E. coli strain in combination with a nongenotoxic E. coli control strain. We adopted this protocol to monitor the natural mother-to-pup vertical transmission, which is among the strongest factors for E. coli dissemination in further generations (16). The genotoxin colibactin was demonstrated to act on eukaryotic cells by affecting DNA stability (7, 8) and to affect the host at multiple levels (9–13). These effects are likely to be blunted by an efficient intestinal mucous barrier, since an adherent mucous layer on epithelial cells was shown to dampen colibactin-induced DNA double-strand breaks in vitro (19). It was recently reported that another genotoxin, the cytolethal distending toxin produced by the human clinical isolate Campylobacter jejuni 81-176, may affect both the microbial composition and gene expression profile of the gut microbiota of 1% dextran sulfate sodium-fed germfree (GF) Apc mice colonized with C. jejuni 81-176 (20). Beyond this evidence, we investigated whether colibactin may also exert its action against other bacteria of the gut microbiota, which was not known. Our data show a time-dependent double targeting action on gut microbes. (i) Fifteen days after birth, the maternally acquired E. coli genotoxic strain appears to exert an intraspecies effect on gut microbes by targeting bacteria from taxa belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria, to which E. coli belongs. (ii) Then, 35 days after birth, the action of colibactin appears directed against bacteria from Proteobacteria-unrelated taxa of the gut microbiota, such as those belonging to the phylum Firmicutes, showing an interspecies effect. Therefore, our data showing that colibactin may also target the gut microbiota may sustain the putative antibiotic activity of colibactin (17), which may first be devoted to help genotoxic bacteria creating their own niche. Then, once the niche was created, the genotoxic activity of bacteria may help them expand their niche by targeting gut microbes of unrelated taxa. This interpretation is also supported by the effects of colibactin we observed on the gut microbiome at day 35 after birth, where microbial pathways related to DNA repair were the most affected. This evidence is in line with the capacity of colibactin to affect DNA stability (7, 8) and thus induce the DNA repair machinery. In terms of the evolution of the gut microbiota, the genotoxin colibactin strongly changed the overall microbial diversity from day 15 to day 35 in mice which received the genotoxic E. coli strain, compared to mice which received the nongenotoxic E. coli strain. Our data suggest that, in mice, the bacterial genotoxin colibactin may exert its activity even against the gut microbiota, beyond its known effects on the host (7, 9). To ascribe only to colibactin the effects we wanted to study, we used two isogenic mutants differing only in the colibactin-maturating gene clbP (21). Despite this strategy, we cannot totally exclude the possibility that other factors such as bacterial growth, replication, stress response to other stressors and other secondary metabolites may account for the observed results that, hence, may not specifically and unambiguously implicate colibactin itself. However, we recently demonstrated (15) that (i) the mutant of the clbP catalytic site used in our study does not affect siderophe-microcin production and (ii) the SP15 strain used does not produce siderophore-microcin, because is deprived of Mcc genes. Therefore, at least siderophore-microcin production appears not to account in this context. Furthermore, the effects of the colibactin-producing strain may be indirect, due to the impact on the host intestinal mucosa, such as increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (22), which, in turn, may alter both composition and function of gut microbiota. Overall, the implication of all of this evidence may help in understanding the benefits that the acquisition of genotoxicity may provide to pks+ bacteria, such as the establishing and expanding of their own niche within the complex intestinal microbial ecosystem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal model and tissue collection.

The animal model used in this study was already published (12). Briefly, primiparous timed pregnant Swiss CD1 mice were purchased from Janvier Labs, housed separately under specific-pathogen-free conditions with access to food and water supplemented with streptomycin (5g/liter) ad libitum. Pregnant SWISS CD1 females were inoculated once with a total of 109 bacteria (E. coli MG1655 alone or in combination with SP15_clb+ or SP15_clb- strain, each at 5 × 108 bacteria to have a total of 109 bacteria) by intragastric gavage the day before parturition. Mice were sacrificed in a fed state by cervical dislocation; then, cecal tissues were collected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. All animal experimental procedures were approved by the local ethical committee (protocol CE2017031317082461V3) of Purpan University Hospital (Toulouse, France). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Strain construction.

E. coli strain SP15 is an extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strain of serotype O18:K1 isolated from a patient with neonatal meningitis (23). Strain SP15 harbors the pks island and was previously shown to produce colibactin (24). Inactivation of the gene clbP (21) was engineered by using the lambda Red recombinase method (25) using primers clbP-P1 and clbP-P2 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) followed by excision of the kanamycin resistance cassette, as previously described (25), to produce strain SP15Δclb-. The functional wild-type clbP gene and the clbP gene that was site directed mutagenized to inactivate the catalytic site of the ClbP enzyme were PCR amplified from vectors pBRSK-clbP and pBRSK-clbP-S95A (21), respectively, using primers clbP-F-Bam and pBRSK-F-Bam (Fig. S2). The resulting PCR products were restricted by BamHI and cloned into vector pCM17 (26) digested by BamHI. The resulting plasmids pCM17-clbP and pCM17-clbP-S95A were transformed into strain SP15Δclb-. The resulting strains SP15clb+ and SP15clb- were demonstrated to produce colibactin and not produce colibactin, respectively.

Taxonomic analysis of the cecum microbiota by MiSeq.

Total DNA was extracted (27) from ceca at both day 15 and day 35 after birth of the mice. The 16S rRNA gene V3-V4 regions were targeted by the 357wf-785R primers and analyzed by MiSeq at RTL Genomics (Lubbock, TX, USA). An average of 19,825 sequences was generated per sample. A complete description of the applied bioinformatic filters is available at https://www.rtlgenomics.com/docs/Data_Analysis_Methodology.pdf. Cladograms were drawn by the Huttenhower Galaxy web application (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/) via the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) algorithm (28). LDA scores have been calculated as specified at https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/, tool LEfSe, point B “LDA Effect Size (LEfSe).”

Statistical analysis.

Results are presented as means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). Statistical analyses were performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a two-stage linear step-up procedure of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli to correct for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05) or Kruskal-Wallis test plus a two-stage step-up method of Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli correction for multiple comparisons by controlling the false-discovery rate (<0.05) or Mann-Whitney test, as indicated in the figure legend, by using GraphPad Prism version 7.00 for Windows Vista (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Values were considered significant when the P value was <0.05 or as reported after corrections. For cladograms, the alpha value for the factorial Kruskal-Wallis test among classes and the alpha value for the pairwise Wilcoxon test between subclasses have been changed to P < 0.01, as shown on figures. Principal-component analyses were drawn, and diversity indices were calculated with the software PAST 4 (https://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/). Heat-maps based on a Pearson distance and a complete linkage were drawn with the PermutMatrix software (29). Data shown on heat-maps have been centered reduced to improve the color readout.

Availability of data and materials.

All data are available in the main text or the supplemental material and via the following repositories: Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/ with the assigned identifier PRJNA593936.
  29 in total

1.  Bacterial genotoxin colibactin promotes colon tumour growth by inducing a senescence-associated secretory phenotype.

Authors:  Antony Cougnoux; Guillaume Dalmasso; Ruben Martinez; Emmanuel Buc; Julien Delmas; Lucie Gibold; Pierre Sauvanet; Claude Darcha; Pierre Déchelotte; Mathilde Bonnet; Denis Pezet; Harald Wodrich; Arlette Darfeuille-Michaud; Richard Bonnet
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products.

Authors:  K A Datsenko; B L Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The genotoxin colibactin exacerbates lymphopenia and decreases survival rate in mice infected with septicemic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ingrid Marcq; Patricia Martin; Delphine Payros; Gabriel Cuevas-Ramos; Michèle Boury; Claude Watrin; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède; Maïwenn Olier; Eric Oswald
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  ClbP is a prototype of a peptidase subgroup involved in biosynthesis of nonribosomal peptides.

Authors:  Damien Dubois; Olivier Baron; Antony Cougnoux; Julien Delmas; Nathalie Pradel; Michèle Boury; Bernadette Bouchon; Marie-Agnès Bringer; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède; Eric Oswald; Richard Bonnet
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Association of colorectal cancer with pathogenic Escherichia coli: Focus on mechanisms using optical imaging.

Authors:  Julie Veziant; Johan Gagnière; Elodie Jouberton; Virginie Bonnin; Pierre Sauvanet; Denis Pezet; Nicolas Barnich; Elisabeth Miot-Noirault; Mathilde Bonnet
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-10

6.  Use of stabilized luciferase-expressing plasmids to examine in vivo-induced promoters in the Vibrio cholerae vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR.

Authors:  Cara E Morin; James B Kaper
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 7.  Early settlers: which E. coli strains do you not want at birth?

Authors:  Thomas Secher; Camille Brehin; Eric Oswald
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.052

8.  Maternally acquired genotoxic Escherichia coli alters offspring's intestinal homeostasis.

Authors:  Delphine Payros; Thomas Secher; Michèle Boury; Camille Brehin; Sandrine Ménard; Christel Salvador-Cartier; Gabriel Cuevas-Ramos; Claude Watrin; Ingrid Marcq; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède; Damien Dubois; Antoine Bedu; Fabien Garnier; Olivier Clermont; Erick Denamur; Pascale Plaisancié; Vassilia Theodorou; Jean Fioramonti; Maïwenn Olier; Eric Oswald
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014-06-27

9.  Metabolic adaptation to a high-fat diet is associated with a change in the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Matteo Serino; Elodie Luche; Sandra Gres; Audrey Baylac; Mathieu Bergé; Claire Cenac; Aurelie Waget; Pascale Klopp; Jason Iacovoni; Christophe Klopp; Jerome Mariette; Olivier Bouchez; Jerome Lluch; Francoise Ouarné; Pierre Monsan; Philippe Valet; Christine Roques; Jacques Amar; Anne Bouloumié; Vassilia Théodorou; Remy Burcelin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Deciphering the interplay between the genotoxic and probiotic activities of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917.

Authors:  Clémence Massip; Priscilla Branchu; Nadège Bossuet-Greif; Camille V Chagneau; Déborah Gaillard; Patricia Martin; Michèle Boury; Thomas Sécher; Damien Dubois; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède; Eric Oswald
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  The microbiome-shaping roles of bacteriocins.

Authors:  Simon Heilbronner; Bernhard Krismer; Heike Brötz-Oesterhelt; Andreas Peschel
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  The Polyphosphate Kinase of Escherichia coli Is Required for Full Production of the Genotoxin Colibactin.

Authors:  Éric Oswald; Priscilla Branchu; Min Tang-Fichaux; Camille V Chagneau; Nadège Bossuet-Greif; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.389

Review 3.  Immune System, Microbiota, and Microbial Metabolites: The Unresolved Triad in Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment.

Authors:  Michelle Hanus; Daniela Parada-Venegas; Glauben Landskron; Ana Maria Wielandt; Claudia Hurtado; Karin Alvarez; Marcela A Hermoso; Francisco López-Köstner; Marjorie De la Fuente
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Microbiota medicine: towards clinical revolution.

Authors:  Prisca Gebrayel; Carole Nicco; Souhaila Al Khodor; Jaroslaw Bilinski; Elisabetta Caselli; Elena M Comelli; Markus Egert; Cristina Giaroni; Tomasz M Karpinski; Igor Loniewski; Agata Mulak; Julie Reygner; Paulina Samczuk; Matteo Serino; Mariusz Sikora; Annalisa Terranegra; Marcin Ufnal; Romain Villeger; Chantal Pichon; Peter Konturek; Marvin Edeas
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  Characterization of Escherichia coli harboring colibactin genes (clb) isolated from beef production and processing systems.

Authors:  Manita Guragain; John W Schmidt; Norasak Kalchayanand; Aaron M Dickey; Joseph M Bosilevac
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A commensal-encoded genotoxin drives restriction of Vibrio cholerae colonization and host gut microbiome remodeling.

Authors:  Jiandong Chen; Hyuntae Byun; Rui Liu; I-Ji Jung; Qinqin Pu; Clara Y Zhu; Ethan Tanchoco; Salma Alavi; Patrick H Degnan; Amy T Ma; Manuela Roggiani; Joris Beld; Mark Goulian; Ansel Hsiao; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  Role of Gut Microbiota and Probiotics in Colorectal Cancer: Onset and Progression.

Authors:  Edgar Torres-Maravilla; Anne-Sophie Boucard; Amir Hossein Mohseni; Sedigheh Taghinezhad-S; Naima G Cortes-Perez; Luis G Bermúdez-Humarán
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 8.  Shining a Light on Colibactin Biology.

Authors:  Michael W Dougherty; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 9.  Tackling the Threat of Cancer Due to Pathobionts Producing Colibactin: Is Mesalamine the Magic Bullet?

Authors:  Min Tang-Fichaux; Priscilla Branchu; Jean-Philippe Nougayrède; Eric Oswald
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Stool pattern is associated with not only the prevalence of tumorigenic bacteria isolated from fecal matter but also plasma and fecal fatty acids in healthy Japanese adults.

Authors:  Daiki Watanabe; Haruka Murakami; Harumi Ohno; Kumpei Tanisawa; Kana Konishi; Kikue Todoroki-Mori; Yuta Tsunematsu; Michio Sato; Yuji Ogata; Noriyuki Miyoshi; Naoto Kubota; Jun Kunisawa; Keiji Wakabayashi; Tetsuya Kubota; Kenji Watanabe; Motohiko Miyachi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.