Literature DB >> 32611648

A Biomarker-enriched, Randomized Phase II Trial of Adavosertib (AZD1775) Plus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Women with Platinum-sensitive TP53-mutant Ovarian Cancer.

Amit M Oza1, Maria Estevez-Diz2, Eva-Maria Grischke3, Marcia Hall4, Frederik Marmé5, Diane Provencher6, Denise Uyar7, Johanne I Weberpals8, Robert M Wenham9, Naomi Laing10, Michael Tracy11, Tomoko Freshwater12, Mark A Lee12, Ji Liu12, Jingjun Qiu13, Shelonitda Rose12, Eric H Rubin12, Kathleen Moore14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preclinical studies show that adavosertib, a WEE1 kinase inhibitor, sensitizes TP53-mutant cells to chemotherapy. We hypothesized that adavosertib, plus chemotherapy, would enhance efficacy versus placebo in TP53-mutated ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following safety run-in, this double-blind phase II trial (NCT01357161) randomized women with TP53-mutated, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer to oral adavosertib (225 mg twice daily for 2.5 days/21-day cycle) or placebo, plus carboplatin (AUC5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), until disease progression or for six cycles. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) by enhanced RECIST v1.1 [ePFS (volumetric)] and safety. Secondary/exploratory objectives included PFS by RECIST v1.1 (single dimension), objective response rate, overall survival, and analysis of tumor gene profile versus sensitivity to adavosertib.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were randomized to adavosertib (A+C; n = 59) and placebo (P+C; n = 62) plus chemotherapy. Adding adavosertib to chemotherapy improved ePFS [median, 7.9 (95% confidence interval (CI), 6.9-9.9) vs. 7.3 months (5.6-8.2); HR 0.63 (95% CI, 0.38-1.06); two-sided P = 0.080], meeting the predefined significance threshold (P < 0.2). Clinical benefit was observed following A+C for patients with different TP53 mutation subtypes, identifying possible response biomarkers. An increase in adverse events was seen with A+C versus P+C: greatest for diarrhea (adavosertib 75%; placebo 37%), vomiting (63%; 27%), anemia (53%; 32%), and all grade ≥3 adverse events (78%; 65%).
CONCLUSIONS: Establishing an optimal strategy for managing tolerability and identifying specific patient populations most likely to benefit from treatment may increase clinical benefit. Future studies should consider additional adavosertib doses within the chemotherapy treatment cycle and the potential for maintenance therapy. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32611648     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  26 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the DNA damage response beyond poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: novel agents and rational combinations.

Authors:  Natalie Y L Ngoi; Shannon N Westin; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.915

Review 2.  Targeting replication stress in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alexandre André B A da Costa; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Alan D D'Andrea; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 112.288

3.  A targetable MYBL2-ATAD2 axis governs cell proliferation in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Qun Liu; Heshu Liu; Xuying Huang; Xiaona Fan; Zeru Xiao; Rui Yan; Jiannan Yao; Guanyu An; Yang Ge; Jinwei Miao; Jian Liu
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.854

4.  Splicing factor BUD31 promotes ovarian cancer progression through sustaining the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL2L12.

Authors:  Zixiang Wang; Shourong Wang; Junchao Qin; Xiyu Zhang; Gang Lu; Hongbin Liu; Haiyang Guo; Ligang Wu; Victoria O Shender; Changshun Shao; Beihua Kong; Zhaojian Liu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Clinical Efficacy and Molecular Response Correlates of the WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib Combined with Cisplatin in Patients with Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eliezer M Van Allen; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Sara M Tolaney; Tanya E Keenan; Tianyu Li; Tuulia Vallius; Jennifer L Guerriero; Nabihah Tayob; Bose Kochupurakkal; Janae Davis; Ricardo Pastorello; Rie K Tahara; Leilani Anderson; Jake Conway; Meng X He; Erin Shannon; Robert E Godin; Peter K Sorger; Alan D'Andrea; Beth Overmoyer; Eric P Winer; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 13.801

6.  Can TP53 variant negative be high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma? A case series.

Authors:  Lawrence Kasherman; Swati Garg; Nairi Tchrakian; Blaise Clarke; Katherine Karakasis; Raymond H Kim; Tracy L Stockley; Neesha Dhani; Amit M Oza; Stephanie Lheureux
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 7.  Targeting the replication stress response through synthetic lethal strategies in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Natalie Y L Ngoi; Melissa M Pham; David S P Tan; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 8.  Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Antje M Wengner; Arne Scholz; Bernard Haendler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Pharmacological Inhibition of WEE1 Potentiates the Antitumoral Effect of the dl922-947 Oncolytic Virus in Malignant Mesothelioma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Carmelina Antonella Iannuzzi; Paola Indovina; Iris Maria Forte; Sarah Di Somma; Anna Maria Malfitano; Martina Bruno; Giuseppe Portella; Francesca Pentimalli; Antonio Giordano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  WEE1 Inhibitor: Clinical Development.

Authors:  Anthony Kong; Hisham Mehanna
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.