| Literature DB >> 32610661 |
Handi Dahmana1,2, Masse Sambou3,4, Didier Raoult1,2, Florence Fenollar2,3, Oleg Mediannikov1,2.
Abstract
Vector-borne deadly pathogens cause more than 700,000 deaths annually. They are transmitted by several vectors, among which the mosquito is the most important. Chemical compounds often have devastating side effects, leading to the abandonment of the majority of them. Biological control has been performed by using formulations of Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis, but their intensive use has led to the emergence of resistance. Currently, the development of new alternative molecules is urgently needed, in order to use them in mosaics or in rotation with already known insecticides for the control of vectors, especially mosquitoes. Here, we attempted to identify bacterial species with potential anti-mosquito actions. Among bacterial strains isolated from dry sandy soil from Senegal, eleven strains from the Bacillales and Actinomycetales orders were chosen for the entomopathogenic activity experiments. Then, we tested their secondary metabolites, which were obtained from the supernatant fraction, and their cell wall and cytoplasmic compounds, which were found in the pellet fraction, in Aedes albopictus larvae, and compared the larval mortality rate with that obtained by using a commercial product. A total of 4/11 (36.36%) of the isolated species exhibited insecticidal activity. B. nealsonii, which is not a well-known bacterium, had the highest larvicidal effect with 70% of the larval mortality, which is highlighted for the first time. The Streptomyces species we isolated seem to be potential new species, and 3/5 (60%) of them exhibited insecticidal activity. Our study reports provide potential candidates for the identification of active molecules to be developed for strengthening the biological control of infectious diseases agents transmitted by mosquitoes.Entities:
Keywords: biological control; insecticide; mosquito borne diseases; secondary metabolites; soil bacteria
Year: 2020 PMID: 32610661 PMCID: PMC7412510 DOI: 10.3390/insects11070403
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Site of sandy soil sampling in Ganket village, Senegal.
Figure 2Dendrograms for the Streptomyces strains generated using the MALDI Biotyper 3.0 software, with Streptomyces atrovirens as the outgroup.
Figure 3Maximum-likelihood phylodendrogram of Streptomyces spp., including the species isolated in the present study based on the partial 466-bp sequence of the atpD gene.
Figure 4Maximum-likelihood phylodendrogram of Streptomyces spp., including the species isolated in the present study based on the partial 1000-bp sequence of the 23S rRNA gene.
Isolated strains used in the study.
| Order | Genus and Species | Strain Code |
|---|---|---|
|
| Sen 181 | |
|
| Sen 43 | |
|
| Sen 154 | |
|
| Sen 86 | |
|
| Sen 39 | |
|
|
| Sen 108 |
|
|
| Sen 132 |
|
|
| Sen 7 |
|
|
| Sen 186 |
|
|
| Sen 66 |
|
| Sen 140 |
Detailed results of the insecticidal activity of the secondary metabolites of the isolated species against third and early fourth instar A. albopictus larvae at 72 h post-administration.
| Species | Strain | Negative Control | Pellet | Supernatant | Supernatant + Pellet (6 mg/L) * | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (2–6 mg/L) | 2 mg/L | 6 mg/L | |||||
| Sen 181 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 18% | 20% | No potential Insecticidal activity | |
| Sen 43 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 12% | 8% | No potential Insecticidal activity | |
| Sen 154 | 0% | 0% | 29% | 31% | 28% | Potential Insecticidal activity | |
| Sen 86 | 0% | 0% | 35% | 41% | 32% | Potential Insecticidal activity | |
| Sen 39 | 0% | 0% | 30% | 36% | 40% | Potential Insecticidal activity | |
|
| Sen 108 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 4% | No potential Insecticidal activity |
|
| Sen 132 | 0% | 0% | 40% | 70% | 84% | Potential Insecticidal activity |
|
| Sen 7 | 0% | 0% | 4% | 4% | 12% | No potential Insecticidal activity |
|
| Sen 186 | 0% | 0% | 5% | 6% | 4% | No potential Insecticidal activity |
|
| Sen 66 | 0% | 0% | 10% | 10% | 12% | No potential Insecticidal activity |
| Sen 140 | 0% | 0% | 4% | 6% | 8% | No potential Insecticidal activity | |
|
| AM65-52 | 0% | 0% | 15% | 33% | 34% | Insecticidal activity |
*: (6 mg/L) each.
Comparison of the efficacy of the strains to that of the positive control Bti.
| Strain | Code | Mortality Rate | Standard Deviation | Groups | Mean Rank | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sen 181 | 18% | 0.386 | A-B | 90 | 0.011 | Neg. S ** | |
| Sen 43 | 12% | 0.302 | A | 138 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** | |
| Sen 154 | 31% | 0.461 | B-C | 18 | 0.610 | NS *** | |
| Sen 86 | 41% | 0.494 | C | −48 | 0.173 | NS *** | |
| Sen 39 | 36% | 0.482 | B-C | −18 | 0.610 | NS *** | |
|
| Sen 108 | 2% | 0.141 | A | 186 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** |
|
| Sen 132 | 70% | 0.461 | D | −222 | ≤0.0001 | Pos. S * |
|
| Sen 7 | 4% | 0.197 | A | 174 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** |
|
| Sen 186 | 6% | 0.239 | A | 162 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** |
|
| Sen 66 | 10% | 0.302 | A | 138 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** |
| Sen 140 | 6% | 0.239 | A | 162 | ≤0.0001 | Neg. S ** |
* -Pos. S: Positively significant ** -Neg. S: Negatively significant *** -NS: Non-significant.