| Literature DB >> 32610621 |
G Richhariya1, D T K Dora1, K R Parmar2, K K Pant2, N Singhal3, K Lal4, P P Kundu5.
Abstract
In the present work, a novel cross-linkedEntities:
Keywords: DUAL coated Polyacrylamide (PAM); expansion; microcrack; self-healing cement; water absorption
Year: 2020 PMID: 32610621 PMCID: PMC7372404 DOI: 10.3390/ma13132921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic diagram for the synthesis of DPAM and cement core.
Composition of Class-G oil well cement.
| Components | SiO2 | CaO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SO3 | MgO | K2O | Na2O | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (wt.%) | 22.84 | 63.72 | 5.02 | 3.46 | 1.69 | 1.30 | 0.46 | 0.89 | 22.84 |
Mixing proportion of the cement paste.
| Sl. No. | Specimen No. | Weight of Cement (g) | DPAM (wt.%) | DO 65 (wt.%) | Water (wt.%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S1 | 500 | 4 | 0.2 | 44 |
| 2 | S2 | 500 | 8 | 0.2 | 44 |
| 3 | S3 | 500 | 12 | 0.2 | 44 |
| 4 | S4 | 500 | 16 | 0.2 | 44 |
| 5 | Neat Cement (NC) | 500 | 0 | 0.2 | 44 |
Figure 2Snapshots of the synthesized cement core with (a) 4% (b) 8% (c) 12% and (d) 16% dosage of DPAM.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the cement core with a single penetrating crack for the flow measurement (a) pre-notched specimen subjected to crack generation (b) crack generation (c) snapshot of split specimen (d,e) core holder (f) assembled core with artificial crack.
Figure 4Stereomicrograph at the crack for the samples (a) S1 (b) S2 (c) S3 (d) S4.
Scheme 1(A) Initiation (B) Propagation reaction of polymer synthesis.
Scheme 2Cross-linking reaction of cyanoacrylate and MBIS.
Scheme 3Termination by solvent (linseed oil) transfer.
Figure 5FTIR spectrum of PAM, SPAM, and DPAM.
Figure 6XRD pattern of PAM, SPAM, and DPAM.
Figure 7SEM micrograph of the synthesized (a–c) PAM (d–f) SPAM (g–i) DPAM.
Figure 8FTIR spectrum of cement and cement core.
Figure 9XRD pattern of cement and cement core.
Figure 10Water contact angle measurement of sample S4 at time of exposure of (a) t = 0 h (b) t = 1 h and (c) t = 5 h.
Figure 11Water-absorption capacity of (a) synthesized polymers in distilled water (b) DPAM in KCl solution (c) DPAM in NaCl solution.
Figure 12Linear expansion of cement core with different dosage of DPAM.
Figure 13Water flow through single crack in the cement core for (a) various dosage of DPAM at 0.4 atm differential pressure (b) various differential pressures for 16% dosage DPAM cement core.
Figure 14Snapshots of split cement core (a) before (b,c) after water absorption.
Figure 15Snapshots of sample S4 (a) before (b) after water-flow test.
Figure 16Rheological behavior of the cement paste.
Figure 17Compressive strength of cement core.
Comparison of the results with the earlier reported studies.
| Sl. No. | Type of Cement and Additives | Water-Absorption Capacity of Polymer (G/g) | Linear Expansion of Cement | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Class-G Oil well cement, SAP, Calcium carbonate | 12.5 (within 35 min) | Not studied | 24.4 | Liu et al. [ |
| 2 | Cement, SAP | 163 | 100–200 | Not studied | Snoeck et al. [ |
| 3 | Cement with fly ash, SAP | 2.59 | 20 | 10.6 | Lee et al. [ |
| 4 | Cement, Fly ash, SAP | 8 (after 2 h) | Not studied | 15 | Snoeck et al. [ |
| 5 | SAP, poly-carboxylate ether, ordinary Portland cement | 27.5 (within 15 min) | 100 | 54 | Baloch et al. [ |
| 6 | Cement, chitosen, PAM, Class-G oil well cement | 4.8 (within 5 h) | Not studied | 38–41 | Liu et al. [ |
| 7 | Portland Cement, 5%SAP | 0.08 | Not studied | 28.74 Mpa | Rai and Singh [ |
| 8 | Class F Fly ash, CAC, sodium hexametaphosphate | Not studied | 180 | 25 | Sugama and Pyatina [ |
| 9 | Epoxy acrylate, OPC, Cellulose | Not studied | 900 | 7 (Flexural strength) | Lv et al. [ |
| 10 | Class-G oil-well cement, DPAM | 2.5 (after 26 h) | 260 | 21.6 | Present work |