| Literature DB >> 32610619 |
Zbigniew Zając1, Katarzyna Bartosik1, Joanna Kulisz1, Aneta Woźniak1.
Abstract
Dermacentor reticulatus ticks, one of the most important vectors and reservoirs of tick-borne diseases in Europe, are widespread in the temperate climate zone and in some localities in the subtropical climate zone of the western Palaearctic region. These ticks occur in a large area characterised by a varied climate type, vegetation, and availability of potential hosts. Hence, they exhibit high ecological plasticity and adaptability to periodically adverse conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of D. reticulatus adults to overwinter in the natural habitat. Specimens marked with a permanent oil marker on the festoons were placed in their natural habitats for the winter. Concurrently, tick survival in laboratory conditions at a temperature of 5 °C and 18 °C was assessed as a control. The groups were compared with each other by determination of the weight of fat bodies. In the field conditions, 67.9% females and 60.0% males survived the winter. There was no significant difference in the survival of ticks in the laboratory. A significantly lower fat body weight was found in the group of ticks overwintering in the field conditions and exhibiting questing activity between spring and late autumn during the following year. On the population scale, adult D. reticulatus ticks are able to survive the winter in temperate climate conditions at a level ensuring a further increase in their population size. In adverse weather conditions, ticks enter diapause, thus maximally reducing the utilisation of the content of their fat bodies. This facilitates long-term survival in the environment.Entities:
Keywords: Dermacentor reticulatus; tick activity; tick overwinter; ticks; ticks and winter
Year: 2020 PMID: 32610619 PMCID: PMC7407287 DOI: 10.3390/biology9070145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Adult Dermacentor reticulatus female in natural condition that previously has been marked with a permanent oil marker (yellow) on the festoons.
Figure 2Scheme of the distribution of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in the field, ●—sites of placing the ticks in the experimental plot.
Seasonal activity of Dermacentor reticulatus individuals assessed after overwintering and a local population of this species co-occurring in the examined site.
| Season of the Year | Date | Weather Conditions at the Time of Collection | Number of Active Specimens (Co-Occurring) | Number of Active Specimens (after Overwintering) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T [⁰C] | H [%] | F | M | F ( | M ( | ||
|
| 25.02 | 08.9 | 77.0 | 8 | 6 | 12 | 14 |
| 11.03 | 07.0 | 81.0 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 10 | |
| 18.03 | 13.3 | 70.5 | 9 | 10 | 22 | 16 | |
| 25.03 | 13.5 | 67.1 | 13 | 10 | 18 | 19 | |
| 01.04 | 20.1 | 65.0 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 17 | |
| 08.04 | 16.0 | 80.0 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 8 | |
| 15.04 | 22.5 | 61.1 | 12 | 11 | 5 | 9 | |
| 23.04 | 17.0 | 61.0 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 5 | |
| 30.04 | 15.1 | 79.0 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 8 | |
| 08.05 | 22.5 | 73.0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 15.05 | 22.9 | 70.1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
|
| 02.09 | 20.0 | 72.9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| 16.09 | 20.5 | 74.4 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |
| 23.09 | 18.0 | 79.8 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 8 | |
| 30.09 | 16.1 | 80.1 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 12 | |
| 07.10 | 20.3 | 80.2 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 2 | |
| 14.10 | 17.3 | 68.9 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 25.10 | 18.0 | 62.0 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |
| 04.11 | 11.0 | 86.7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
|
| 170 | 109 | 163 | 144 | |||
T—temperature, H—relative air humidity, F—females, M—males, n—number of ticks used in the experiment.
Weather conditions recorded by Lublin station during the study on the survivability of Dermacentor reticulatus ticks; data from the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management [30].
| Month | Weather Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAV [°C] | TMAX [°C] | TMIN [°C] | H [%] | PP [mm] | SN [days] | TMAX < 5 °C [days] | |
| 11.2018 * | 0.3 | 3.0 | −2.2 | 88.4 | 6.6 | 0 | 9 |
| 12.2018 | 0.1 | 2.1 | −2.2 | 91.3 | 65.5 | 14 | 0 |
| 01.2019 | −3.4 | −1.1 | −6.3 | 87.6 | 47.5 | 26 | 0 |
| 02.2019 | 2.0 | 5.7 | −1.1 | 80.3 | 18.0 | 5 | 15 |
| 03.2019 | 4.9 | 9.8 | 0.8 | 71.6 | 23.0 | 5 | 30 |
| 04.2019 | 9.3 | 14.8 | 4.0 | 58.3 | 31.0 | 1 | 30 |
| 0.52019 | 13.5 | 18.0 | 12.3 | 77.0 | 26.0 | 0 | 31 |
| 06.2019 | 21.3 | 27.3 | 15.0 | 68.3 | 29.0 | 0 | 30 |
| 07.2019 | 19.4 | 24.5 | 12.0 | 64.4 | 31.0 | 0 | 31 |
| 08.2019 | 19.7 | 25.9 | 13.8 | 68.2 | 28.0 | 0 | 31 |
| 09.2019 | 14.1 | 19.6 | 9.1 | 75.7 | 46.5 | 0 | 30 |
| 10.2019 | 10.5 | 16.2 | 6.2 | 81.3 | 35.0 | 0 | 31 |
| 11.2019 * | 7.6 | 12.2 | 2.7 | 81.2 | 7.3 | 0 | 2 |
*—the analysis only included days when the ticks stayed in the field, TAV—average temperature, TMAX—average maximum temperature, TMIN—average minimum temperature, H—average relative humidity, PP—total rainfall and/or snowmelt, SN—snow indicator (in the monthly average, total days with snow).
Survival rates in adult Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in laboratory conditions in the period of 13 November 2018–25 February 2019; the observations were carried out at equal 7-day intervals.
| Day | Number of Live Specimens ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 °C; 90% RH | 18 °C; 90% RH | |||
| F (%) | M (%) | F (%) | M (%) | |
| 7 | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) |
| 14 | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) |
| 21 | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) |
| 28 | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) |
| 35 | 30 (100) | 29 (97) | 30 (100) | 30 (100) |
| 42 | 30 (100) | 28 (93) | 30 (100) | 29 (97) |
| 49 | 28 (93) | 28 (93) | 30 (100) | 29 (97) |
| 56 | 28 (93) | 28 (93) | 30 (100) | 29 (97) |
| 63 | 25 (83) | 28 (93) | 28 (93) | 29 (97) |
| 70 | 25 (83) | 24 (80) | 26 (87) | 29 (97) |
| 77 | 25 (83) | 24 (80) | 25 (83) | 27 (90) |
| 84 | 25 (83) | 24 (80) | 25 (83) | 27 (90) |
| 91 | 24 (80) | 24 (80) | 25 (83) | 25 (83) |
| 98 | 22 (73) | 24 (80) | 25 (83) | 24 (80) |
| 105 | 22 (73) | 24 (80) | 25 (83) | 24 (80) |
F—females, M—males, n—number of observed specimens, RH—relative air humidity.
Mean weight of fat bodies of adult Dermacentor reticulatus ticks in each group of females and males.
| Parameter | Mean Weight of Fat Bodies of Analysed Specimens [mg] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory Conditions | Field Conditions ( | |||||||||
| 5 °C | 18 °C | Autumn 2018 | Spring 2019 | Autumn 2019 | ||||||
| F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | |
| M | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| SD | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Med | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Min | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Max | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.80 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.37 | 0.45 |
M—Mean, SD—Standard deviation, Med—median, Min—minimum value, Max—maximum value, F—Females, M—Males, n—number of females and males in each group.