Jonathan D Hron1,2, Chase R Parsons1,2, Lee Ann Williams3, Marvin B Harper2,4, Fabienne C Bourgeois1,2. 1. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 3. Patient Care Operations, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 4. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relaxation of laws and regulations around privacy and billing during the COVID-19 pandemic provide expanded opportunities to use telehealth to provide patient care at a distance. Many health systems have transitioned to providing outpatient care via telehealth; however, there is an opportunity to utilize telehealth for inpatients to promote physical distancing. OBJECTIVE: This article evaluates the use of a rapidly implemented, secure inpatient telehealth program. METHODS: We assembled a multidisciplinary team to rapidly design, implement, and iteratively improve an inpatient telehealth quality improvement initiative using an existing videoconferencing system at our academic medical center. We assigned each hospital bed space a unique meeting link and updated the meeting password for each new patient. Patients and families were encouraged to use their own mobile devices to join meetings when possible. RESULTS: Within 7 weeks of go-live, we hosted 1,820 inpatient telehealth sessions (13.3 sessions per 100 bedded days). We logged 104,647 minutes of inpatient telehealth time with a median session duration of 22 minutes (range 1-1,961). There were 5,288 participant devices used with a mean of 3 devices per telehealth session (range 2-22). Clinicians found they were able to build rapport and perform a reasonable physical exam. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented and scaled a secure inpatient telehealth program using an existing videoconferencing system in less than 1 week. Our implementation provided an intuitive naming convention for providers and capitalized on the broad availability of smartphones and tablets. Initial comments from clinicians suggest the system was useful; however, further work is needed to streamline initial setup for patients and families as well as care coordination to support clinician communication and workflows. Numerous use cases identified suggest a role for inpatient telehealth will remain after the COVID-19 crisis underscoring the importance of lasting regulatory reform. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
BACKGROUND: Relaxation of laws and regulations around privacy and billing during the COVID-19 pandemic provide expanded opportunities to use telehealth to provide patient care at a distance. Many health systems have transitioned to providing outpatient care via telehealth; however, there is an opportunity to utilize telehealth for inpatients to promote physical distancing. OBJECTIVE: This article evaluates the use of a rapidly implemented, secure inpatient telehealth program. METHODS: We assembled a multidisciplinary team to rapidly design, implement, and iteratively improve an inpatient telehealth quality improvement initiative using an existing videoconferencing system at our academic medical center. We assigned each hospital bed space a unique meeting link and updated the meeting password for each new patient. Patients and families were encouraged to use their own mobile devices to join meetings when possible. RESULTS: Within 7 weeks of go-live, we hosted 1,820 inpatient telehealth sessions (13.3 sessions per 100 bedded days). We logged 104,647 minutes of inpatient telehealth time with a median session duration of 22 minutes (range 1-1,961). There were 5,288 participant devices used with a mean of 3 devices per telehealth session (range 2-22). Clinicians found they were able to build rapport and perform a reasonable physical exam. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented and scaled a secure inpatient telehealth program using an existing videoconferencing system in less than 1 week. Our implementation provided an intuitive naming convention for providers and capitalized on the broad availability of smartphones and tablets. Initial comments from clinicians suggest the system was useful; however, further work is needed to streamline initial setup for patients and families as well as care coordination to support clinician communication and workflows. Numerous use cases identified suggest a role for inpatient telehealth will remain after the COVID-19 crisis underscoring the importance of lasting regulatory reform. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Authors: Howard Markel; Harvey B Lipman; J Alexander Navarro; Alexandra Sloan; Joseph R Michalsen; Alexandra Minna Stern; Martin S Cetron Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Harunor Rashid; Iman Ridda; Catherine King; Matthew Begun; Hatice Tekin; James G Wood; Robert Booy Journal: Paediatr Respir Rev Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 2.726
Authors: Francesco Chiappelli; Andre Bakhordarian; April D Thames; Angela M Du; Allison L Jan; Melissa Nahcivan; Mia T Nguyen; Nateli Sama; Ercolano Manfrini; Francesco Piva; Rafael Malagoli Rocha; Carl A Maida Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Corey Georgesen; Sabrina A Karim; Rebecca Liu; Autumn Moorhead; Louis D Falo; Joseph C English Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Robert W Turer; Ian Jones; S Trent Rosenbloom; Corey Slovis; Michael J Ward Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William J Gordon; Daniel Henderson; Avital DeSharone; Herrick N Fisher; Jessica Judge; David M Levine; Laura MacLean; Diane Sousa; Mack Y Su; Robert Boxer Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Shawn Y Ong; Lisa Stump; Matthew Zawalich; Lisa Edwards; Glynn Stanton; Michael Matthews; Allen L Hsiao Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Vivian Hsiao; Thevaa Chandereng; Robin L Lankton; Jeffrey A Huebner; Jeffrey J Baltus; Grace E Flood; Shannon M Dean; Amye J Tevaarwerk; David F Schneider Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Jennifer L Rosenthal; Hadley S Sauers-Ford; Jacob Williams; Jaskiran Ranu; Daniel J Tancredi; Kristin R Hoffman Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 2.993
Authors: Katherine J Holzer; Sunny S Lou; Charles W Goss; Jaime Strickland; Bradley A Evanoff; Jennifer G Duncan; Thomas Kannampallil Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 2.762