L De Mattos-Arruda1, M Vazquez2, F Finotello3, R Lepore2, E Porta4, J Hundal5, P Amengual-Rigo2, C K Y Ng6, A Valencia7, J Carrillo8, T A Chan9, V Guallar7, N McGranahan10, J Blanco11, M Griffith12. 1. IrsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain. Electronic address: education@esmo.org. 2. Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Biocenter, Institute of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain; Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), Badalona, Spain. 5. The McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St Louis, USA. 6. Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 7. Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain. 8. IrsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain. 9. Center for Immunotherapy and Precision-Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA. 10. Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College, London, UK; Cancer Genome Evolution Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. 11. IrsiCaixa, Hospital Universitari Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain; Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain. 12. Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the rapid identification of non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells. Neoantigens are mutated peptides derived from somatic mutations not present in normal tissues that may result in the presentation of tumour-specific peptides capable of eliciting antitumour T-cell responses. Personalised neoantigen-based cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies have been shown to prime host immunity against tumour cells and are under clinical trial development. However, the optimisation and standardisation of neoantigen identification, as well as its delivery as immunotherapy are needed to increase tumour-specific T-cell responses and, thus, the clinical efficacy of current cancer immunotherapies. METHODS: In this recommendation article, launched by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), we outline and discuss the available framework for neoantigen prediction and present a systematic review of the current scientific evidence. RESULTS: A number of computational pipelines for neoantigen prediction are available. Most of them provide peptide major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity predictions, but more recent approaches incorporate additional features like variant allele fraction, gene expression, and clonality of mutations. Neoantigens can be predicted in all cancer types with high and low tumour mutation burden, in part by exploiting tumour-specific aberrations derived from mutational frameshifts, splice variants, gene fusions, endogenous retroelements and other tumour-specific processes that could yield more potently immunogenic tumour neoantigens. Ongoing clinical trials will highlight those cancer types and combinations of immune therapies that would derive the most benefit from neoantigen-based immunotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Improved identification, selection and prioritisation of tumour-specific neoantigens are needed to increase the scope of benefit from cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies. Novel pipelines are being developed to resolve the challenges posed by high-throughput sequencing and to predict immunogenic neoantigens.
BACKGROUND: The use of next-generation sequencing technologies has enabled the rapid identification of non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells. Neoantigens are mutated peptides derived from somatic mutations not present in normal tissues that may result in the presentation of tumour-specific peptides capable of eliciting antitumour T-cell responses. Personalised neoantigen-based cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies have been shown to prime host immunity against tumour cells and are under clinical trial development. However, the optimisation and standardisation of neoantigen identification, as well as its delivery as immunotherapy are needed to increase tumour-specific T-cell responses and, thus, the clinical efficacy of current cancer immunotherapies. METHODS: In this recommendation article, launched by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), we outline and discuss the available framework for neoantigen prediction and present a systematic review of the current scientific evidence. RESULTS: A number of computational pipelines for neoantigen prediction are available. Most of them provide peptide major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity predictions, but more recent approaches incorporate additional features like variant allele fraction, gene expression, and clonality of mutations. Neoantigens can be predicted in all cancer types with high and low tumour mutation burden, in part by exploiting tumour-specific aberrations derived from mutational frameshifts, splice variants, gene fusions, endogenous retroelements and other tumour-specific processes that could yield more potently immunogenic tumour neoantigens. Ongoing clinical trials will highlight those cancer types and combinations of immune therapies that would derive the most benefit from neoantigen-based immunotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Improved identification, selection and prioritisation of tumour-specific neoantigens are needed to increase the scope of benefit from cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies. Novel pipelines are being developed to resolve the challenges posed by high-throughput sequencing and to predict immunogenic neoantigens.
Authors: Beatriz M Carreno; Vincent Magrini; Michelle Becker-Hapak; Saghar Kaabinejadian; Jasreet Hundal; Allegra A Petti; Amy Ly; Wen-Rong Lie; William H Hildebrand; Elaine R Mardis; Gerald P Linette Journal: Science Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sanja Stevanović; Anna Pasetto; Sarah R Helman; Jared J Gartner; Todd D Prickett; Bryan Howie; Harlan S Robins; Paul F Robbins; Christopher A Klebanoff; Steven A Rosenberg; Christian S Hinrichs Journal: Science Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sebastian Kreiter; Mathias Vormehr; Niels van de Roemer; Mustafa Diken; Martin Löwer; Jan Diekmann; Sebastian Boegel; Barbara Schrörs; Fulvia Vascotto; John C Castle; Arbel D Tadmor; Stephen P Schoenberger; Christoph Huber; Özlem Türeci; Ugur Sahin Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Alena Gros; Maria R Parkhurst; Eric Tran; Anna Pasetto; Paul F Robbins; Sadia Ilyas; Todd D Prickett; Jared J Gartner; Jessica S Crystal; Ilana M Roberts; Kasia Trebska-McGowan; John R Wunderlich; James C Yang; Steven A Rosenberg Journal: Nat Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ignacio Melero; Gustav Gaudernack; Winald Gerritsen; Christoph Huber; Giorgio Parmiani; Suzy Scholl; Nicholas Thatcher; John Wagstaff; Christoph Zielinski; Ian Faulkner; Håkan Mellstedt Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Matthew M Gubin; Xiuli Zhang; Heiko Schuster; Etienne Caron; Jeffrey P Ward; Takuro Noguchi; Yulia Ivanova; Jasreet Hundal; Cora D Arthur; Willem-Jan Krebber; Gwenn E Mulder; Mireille Toebes; Matthew D Vesely; Samuel S K Lam; Alan J Korman; James P Allison; Gordon J Freeman; Arlene H Sharpe; Erika L Pearce; Ton N Schumacher; Ruedi Aebersold; Hans-Georg Rammensee; Cornelis J M Melief; Elaine R Mardis; William E Gillanders; Maxim N Artyomov; Robert D Schreiber Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Roman M Chabanon; Mathieu Rouanne; Christopher J Lord; Jean-Charles Soria; Philippe Pasero; Sophie Postel-Vinay Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Chris Bailey; James R M Black; James L Reading; Kevin Litchfield; Samra Turajlic; Nicholas McGranahan; Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Charles Swanton Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 38.272
Authors: Jeroen H A Creemers; W Joost Lesterhuis; Niven Mehra; Winald R Gerritsen; Carl G Figdor; I Jolanda M de Vries; Johannes Textor Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 13.751