Christine M Pennesi1, Elisabeth H Quint2, Monica W Rosen3, Sarah D Compton3, Erica J Odukoya4, Angela C Weyand5. 1. Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: acweyand@med.umich.edu. 2. Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment patterns and efficacy of hormonal (HM) and non-HM (NHM) management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in young women with inherited platelet function disorders (IPFDs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review was performed of outpatient treatment of HMB in female patients age 9-25 years who were diagnosed with IPFDs and referred to gynecology and/or hematology at a tertiary care hospital between 2006 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: The study sample was identified using billing codes for IPFDs. Data on HM and NHM treatments and outcomes over a one- to two-year period were collected. Initial treatment was defined as the first treatment prescribed after referral. Descriptive statistics, Pearson χ2, and t tests were used for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment failure was defined as a change in treatment method because of continued bleeding. RESULTS: Thirty-four girls met inclusion criteria. After their initial visit, 19/34 (56%) were treated with HM, 12/34 (35%) with NHM, 2/34 (6%) with a combination of methods, and 1/34 (3%) were untreated. Initial treatment failed in 19/34 (56%) and those patients subsequently required a mean of 2 additional treatments during follow-up. Of the 34 included, 6/34 (18%) remained uncontrolled despite numerous treatment changes and 2/34 (6%) because of noncompliance. When control was achieved, 7/26 (27%) of patients were receiving combined oral contraceptives and 6/26 (23%) desmopressin acetate. CONCLUSION: HMB in girls with IPFDs can be difficult to control despite ongoing follow-up and treatment changes. Although the most effective treatment for HMB in young women with IPFDs was not identified, these findings will help providers and patients with setting expectations. Prospective studies are needed to develop recommendations on best practices.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment patterns and efficacy of hormonal (HM) and non-HM (NHM) management of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in young women with inherited platelet function disorders (IPFDs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective chart review was performed of outpatient treatment of HMB in female patients age 9-25 years who were diagnosed with IPFDs and referred to gynecology and/or hematology at a tertiary care hospital between 2006 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: The study sample was identified using billing codes for IPFDs. Data on HM and NHM treatments and outcomes over a one- to two-year period were collected. Initial treatment was defined as the first treatment prescribed after referral. Descriptive statistics, Pearson χ2, and t tests were used for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment failure was defined as a change in treatment method because of continued bleeding. RESULTS: Thirty-four girls met inclusion criteria. After their initial visit, 19/34 (56%) were treated with HM, 12/34 (35%) with NHM, 2/34 (6%) with a combination of methods, and 1/34 (3%) were untreated. Initial treatment failed in 19/34 (56%) and those patients subsequently required a mean of 2 additional treatments during follow-up. Of the 34 included, 6/34 (18%) remained uncontrolled despite numerous treatment changes and 2/34 (6%) because of noncompliance. When control was achieved, 7/26 (27%) of patients were receiving combined oral contraceptives and 6/26 (23%) desmopressin acetate. CONCLUSION: HMB in girls with IPFDs can be difficult to control despite ongoing follow-up and treatment changes. Although the most effective treatment for HMB in young women with IPFDs was not identified, these findings will help providers and patients with setting expectations. Prospective studies are needed to develop recommendations on best practices.