Literature DB >> 32609468

Analysis of the Factors Affecting Lumbar Segmental Lordosis After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Bungo Otsuki1, Shunsuke Fujibayashi, Mitsuru Takemoto, Hiroaki Kimura, Takayoshi Shimizu, Koichi Murata, Shuichi Matsuda.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate factors that determine segmental lordosis after lateral retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LLIF has been widely used in degenerative lumbar spine surgery. However, the detailed mechanisms that determine segmental lordosis are still unknown.
METHODS: A total of 69 patients who underwent LLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation without posterior osteotomy were analyzed. Computed tomography was performed before and within 2 weeks after surgery, and segmental lordotic angle (SLA) after surgery (Post-SLA) was predicted using multiple regression analysis. Explanatory factors considered in this study included SLA before surgery (Pre-SLA), disc height before surgery (DiscH), cage position (CageP; distance between the center of the cage and the center of the disc, where a positive value indicates an anterior cage position), cage angle (CageA), cage height (CageH), CageH-DiscH (amount of lift up), previous decompression surgery, and level fused.
RESULTS: A total of 102 levels were analyzed. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the Post-SLA can be predicted with three independent variables, CageP, Pre-SLA, and CageH-DiscH and the adjusted R was 0.70. In cases when the cage was located anteriorly (CageP > 3 mm), Post-SLA was greater with larger CageH, larger CageA, and larger Pre-SLA. When the cage was located in the middle (3 mm ≤CageP ≤-1 mm), Post-SLA was greater with larger CageP, larger Pre-SLA, and without previous decompression surgery. If the cage was located posteriorly (CageP < -1 mm), Post-SLA was greater with smaller CageH-DiscH and greater Pre-SLA.
CONCLUSION: To gain maximum segmental lordosis in LLIF, the cage should be located anteriorly. Furthermore, if the cage can be located anteriorly, a thicker cage with proper angle cage will gain segmental lordosis. If the cage is located posteriorly, a thin cage should be selected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32609468     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Restoring spinopelvic harmony with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is it a realistic goal?

Authors:  Mina Asaid; Aram Cox; Monique Breslin; Declan Siedler; Chester Sutterlin; Arvind Dubey
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

2.  Effects of preoperative sagittal spinal imbalance on pain after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Hiroyuki Katoh; Daisuke Sakai; Masato Sato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Fusions from the Sacrum to L1 or L2 for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Koichi Murata; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Bungo Otsuki; Takayoshi Shimizu; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-12-27

4.  Impact of the Preoperative Spinopelvic Parameters on the Segmental Lordosis Correction after One-level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Daniel Arnoni; Rodrigo Amaral; Gabriel H Pokorny; Rafael Moriguchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Posterior fixation can further improve the segmental alignment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jingye Wu; Tenghui Ge; Ning Zhang; Jianing Li; Wei Tian; Yuqing Sun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.