Literature DB >> 32609052

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a review of indications, techniques, efficacy and safety.

Sameer Jain1, Timothy Deer2, Dawood Sayed3, Pooja Chopra4, Sayed Wahezi5, Navdeep Jassal6, Jackie Weisbein7, Jessica Jameson8, Mark Malinowski9, Stanley Golovac10.   

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative spine condition. In properly selected patients, minimally invasive lumbar decompression (mild®) may be an option to improve outcomes. This review provides an in-depth description of the mild procedure and a comprehensive examination of safety and efficacy. Two randomized controlled trials, together with 11 other controlled clinical studies, have established the efficacy of mild, which is a minimally invasive procedure that does not involve implants and has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety. With an established safety profile equivalent to epidural steroid injections, and efficacy that has been shown to be superior to such injections, mild can reasonably be positioned early in the treatment algorithm for these patients. Based on extensive review of the literature, robust safety and efficacy through 2 years, and in accordance with minimally invasive spine treatment guidelines, mild is recommended as the first intervention after failure of conservative measures for lumbar spinal stenosis patients with neurogenic claudication and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ligamentum flavum hypertrophy; lumbar spinal stenosis; mild®; minimally invasive lumbar decompression; neurogenic claudication; review

Year:  2020        PMID: 32609052     DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag        ISSN: 1758-1869


  6 in total

Review 1.  Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Jay S Grider; Jason E Pope; Tim J Lamer; Sayed E Wahezi; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Steven Falowski; Reda Tolba; Jay M Shah; Natalie Strand; Alex Escobar; Mark Malinowski; Anjum Bux; Navdeep Jassal; Jennifer Hah; Jacqueline Weisbein; Nestor D Tomycz; Jessica Jameson; Erika A Petersen; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.832

2.  Knowledge Dissemination in Pain Medicine: Searching for Signal Within the Noise.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Michael E Schatman; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Kevin C Jacob; Madhav R Patel; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

4.  The MOTION Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Objective Real-World Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Treated with the mild® Procedure: One-Year Results.

Authors:  Timothy R Deer; Shrif J Costandi; Edward Washabaugh; Timothy B Chafin; Sayed E Wahezi; Navdeep Jassal; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  A Retrospective, Single-Center, Quantitative Analysis of Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication Using a Novel Percutaneous Direct Lumbar Decompression Strategy.

Authors:  Jason E Pope; Timothy R Deer; Steven M Falowski
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Objective Real-World Outcomes of Patients Suffering from Painful Neurogenic Claudication Treated with the mild® Procedure: Interim 6-Month Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Timothy Deer; Christopher Kim; Sayed Emal Wahezi; Huaguang Qu; Dawood Sayed
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.