Literature DB >> 32607814

Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allograft is effective for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries at mid-term follow-up.

Simone Cerciello1,2, Daniel P Berthold3,4, Colin Uyeki3, Cameron Kia3, Mark P Cote3, Andreas B Imhoff4, Knut Beitzel4,5, Katia Corona6, Augustus D Mazzocca3, Lukas N Muench3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon allografts for the treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: Patients who underwent ACCR for chronic ACJ injuries between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant-Murley (CM), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores. Radiographic loss of reduction during follow-up was evaluated by calculating the difference (mm) in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) of the involved side immediately postoperatively and at terminal follow-up.
RESULTS: Forty-two patients (mean age: 42.7 ± 12.8 years) were included in the study with an average follow-up of 3.8 ± 3.1 years (range: 1.1-11.5 years). Patients achieved significant improvement in ASES (50.2 ± 20.1 pre to 85.2 ± 16.3 post), CM (60.2 ± 18.5 pre to 88.2 ± 9.1 post), SST (6.1 ± 3.2 pre to 9.5 ± 3.7 post), and SANE (24.0 ± 25.7 pre to 89.0 ± 12.7 post) scores (P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in functional improvement when comparing type III and V injuries (n.s.). Mean increase in CCD of the involved side from immediately postoperative to final radiographic follow-up was 4.1 ± 3.9 mm, with no significant correlation to clinical outcomes scores. Complications occurred in 33.3% of cases, with postoperative heterotopic ossification being most frequent (14.3%).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing ACCR using free tendon allografts for chronic ACJ injuries achieved significant improvement in shoulder function at a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. No correlation was observed between the amount of loss of reduction and clinical outcome scores. Free tendon allografts may be a reliable alternative to autografts in the treatment of chronic ACJ dislocations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACCR; ACJ; Acromioclavicular joint; Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; Clinical outcomes; Shoulder surgery; Tendon graft

Year:  2020        PMID: 32607814     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06123-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  Conversion to anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) shows similar clinical outcomes compared to successful non-operative treatment in chronic primary type III to V acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Lukas N Muench; Daniel P Berthold; Colin Uyeki; Cameron Kia; Mark P Cote; Andreas B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Katia Corona; Augustus D Mazzocca; Simone Cerciello
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Evidence-based Treatment.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Eric J Cotter; Timothy S Leroux; Anthony A Romeo
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Superior graft maturation after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transtibial drilling technique compared to the transportal technique.

Authors:  Masahiko Saito; Arata Nakajima; Masato Sonobe; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yorikazu Akatsu; Tsutomu Inaoka; Junichi Iwasaki; Tsuguo Morikawa; Atsuya Watanabe; Yasuchika Aoki; Takahisa Sasho; Koichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Horizontal Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gianna M Aliberti; Matthew J Kraeutler; Jeffrey D Trojan; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The importance of biomechanical properties in revision acromioclavicular joint stabilization: a scoping review.

Authors:  Felix Dyrna; Daniel P Berthold; Matthias J Feucht; Lukas N Muench; Frank Martetschläger; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

Authors:  Rodi Ertogrul; Koray Sahin; Haluk Celik; Mehmet Kapicioglu; Ali Ersen; Kerem Bilsel
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system.

Authors:  Marco-Christopher Rupp; Pavel M Kadantsev; Sebastian Siebenlist; Maximilian Hinz; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas N Muench; Daniel P Berthold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  The Role of the Trapezius in Stabilization of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Biomechanical Evaluation.

Authors:  Maxwell T Trudeau; Jonathan J Peters; Benjamin C Hawthorne; Ian J Wellington; Matthew R LeVasseur; Michael R Mancini; Elifho Obopilwe; Giovanni Di Giacomo; Simone Cerciello; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.