R Abdu1, A Vasyluk2, N Reddy2, L-C Huang3, J T Halka2, A DeMare2, R Janczyk2, A Iacco2. 1. Department of General Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. Anthony.Iacco@beaumont.org. 2. Department of General Surgery, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA. 3. Center for Quantitative Sciences Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR). METHODS: Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary cohort of oTAR patients. RESULTS: The cohort included 95 hrTAR and 285 oTAR patients. There was a significantly shorter median LOS in the hrTAR cohort (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of surgical site occurrences in the hrTAR cohort was also lower than for oTAR (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.015). Readmission rates were not different between hrTAR and oTAR (6% vs. 8%, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: hrTAR demonstrates improved LOS compared to oTAR as well as fewer surgical site related occurrences. Further studies are needed to investigate the etiology behind the improved LOS and to confirm appropriate long-term outcomes from hybrid robotic TAR.
PURPOSE: To examine the hospital length of stay (LOS) and 30 day outcomes of hybrid robotic transversus abdominis release (hrTAR) compared with open transversus abdominis release (oTAR). METHODS: Patients receiving hrTAR were selected from the AHSQC database and propensity matched with a contemporary cohort of oTAR patients. RESULTS: The cohort included 95 hrTAR and 285 oTAR patients. There was a significantly shorter median LOS in the hrTAR cohort (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). The rate of surgical site occurrences in the hrTAR cohort was also lower than for oTAR (5% vs. 15%, p = 0.015). Readmission rates were not different between hrTAR and oTAR (6% vs. 8%, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: hrTAR demonstrates improved LOS compared to oTAR as well as fewer surgical site related occurrences. Further studies are needed to investigate the etiology behind the improved LOS and to confirm appropriate long-term outcomes from hybrid robotic TAR.
Authors: Yuri W Novitsky; Mojtaba Fayezizadeh; Arnab Majumder; Ruel Neupane; Heidi L Elliott; Sean B Orenstein Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: James G Bittner; Sameer Alrefai; Michelle Vy; Micah Mabe; Paul A R Del Prado; Natasha L Clingempeel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jeremy A Warren; Alfredo M Carbonell; Lauren K Jones; Aaron Mcguire; William R Hand; Vito A Cancellaro; Joseph A Ewing; William S Cobb Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alfredo M Carbonell; Jeremy A Warren; Ajita S Prabhu; Conrad D Ballecer; Randy J Janczyk; Javier Herrera; Li-Ching Huang; Sharon Phillips; Michael J Rosen; Benjamin K Poulose Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Peter A Walker; Audriene C May; Jiandi Mo; Deepa V Cherla; Monica Rosales Santillan; Steven Kim; Heidi Ryan; Shinil K Shah; Erik B Wilson; Shawn Tsuda Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Maxime Dewulf; Juha M Hiekkaranta; Elisa Mäkäräinen; Juha Saarnio; Maaike Vierstraete; Pasi Ohtonen; Filip Muysoms; Tero Rautio Journal: BJS Open Date: 2022-05-02