| Literature DB >> 32607351 |
O K Yulizal1, Aznan Lelo2, Syafruddin Ilyas3, Raden Lia Kusumawati4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This work was organized to assess macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) expression in snakehead fish extract supplementation to first-line eradication regimen in rats induced by Helicobacter pylori infection.Entities:
Keywords: First-line eradication regimen; Helicobacter pylori infection; macrophage migration inhibitory factor expression; snakehead fish extract
Year: 2020 PMID: 32607351 PMCID: PMC7320804 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g411
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Figure 1.Representation of macrophage MIF expression in IHC staining (Magnification 100×). MIF expression is valued by IRS, which is the result of multiplication between the percentage score of immunoreactive cells with color intensity. Color intensity is characterized by the appearance of brown cells, whereas negative staining results are marked with a paler color. MIF expression is classified into four groups: negative, weak , moderate, and strong. The yellow arrows showed the difference of immunoreactive cells with color intensity. (A) Group-1 (control negative, representation of negative MIF expression); (B) Group-2 (control positive, representation of strong MIF expression); (C) Group-3 (first-line eradication regimen, representation of moderate MIF expression); (D) Group-4 (first-line eradication regimen + snakehead fish extract, representation of weak MIF expression).
Average IRS of MIF expression in each group.
| Groups | Immunoreactive score |
|
|---|---|---|
| Group-1 | 0.17 ± 0.41 |
0.000 |
| Group-2 | 7.50 ± 1.64 | |
| Group-3 | 4.00 ± 1.67 | |
| Group-4 | 1.00 ± 0.63 |
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical test using Kruskal–Wallis. Number of subject per group 6.
p < 0.05.
Post hoc analysis comparing median IRS of macrophage MIF expression between groups.
| Group comparison | Immunoreactive score |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Group-1 |
0.0 (0.0–1.0) |
0.002 |
|
Group-1 |
0.0 (0.0–1.0) |
0.003 |
|
Group-1 |
0.0 (0.0–1.0) |
0.026 |
|
Group-2 |
7.5 (6.0–9.0) |
0.012 |
|
Group-2 |
7.5 (6.0–9.0) |
0.003 |
|
Group-3 |
3.5 (2.0–6.0) |
0.004 |
Data were expressed as median (minimum−maximum). Statistical test using Mann–Whitney. Number of subject per group 6.
p < 0.05
Figure 2.The growth of H. pylori in each group after cultured in eradication testing procedure. The growth of H. pylori was only seen in group-2, and no H. pylori growth was found in the other groups.
The growth of H. pylori in eradication testing procedure.
| Groups |
| Colony-forming unit | Successful rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group-1 | 6 | not detected | – |
| Group-2 | 6 | 1,600 (1,600.00–4,800.00) | 0/6 (0%) |
| Group-3 | 6 | not detected | 6/6 (100%) |
| Group-4 | 6 | not detected | 6/6 (100%) |
Data were expressed as median (minimum−maximum).