| Literature DB >> 32607204 |
Xue-Xian Zhang1,2, Stephen R Ritchie1,3, Hao Chang1, Dawn L Arnold4, Robert W Jackson5, Paul B Rainey1,6,7.
Abstract
Fluorescent pseudomonads represent one of the largest groups of bacteria inhabiting the surfaces of plants, but their genetic composition in planta is poorly understood. Here, we examined the population structure and diversity of fluorescent pseudomonads isolated from sugar beet grown at two geographic locations (Oxford, United Kingdom and Auckland, New Zealand). To seek evidence for niche adaptation, bacteria were sampled from three types of leaves (immature, mature, and senescent) and then characterized using a combination of genotypic and phenotypic analysis. We first performed multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) of three housekeeping genes (gapA, gltA, and acnB) in a total of 152 isolates (96 from Oxford, 56 from Auckland). The concatenated sequences were grouped into 81 sequence types and 22 distinct operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Significant levels of recombination were detected, particularly for the Oxford isolates (rate of recombination to mutation (r/m) = 5.23 for the whole population). Subsequent ancestral analysis performed in STRUCTURE found evidence of six ancestral populations, and their distributions significantly differed between Oxford and Auckland. Next, their ability to grow on 95 carbon sources was assessed using the Biolog™ GN2 microtiter plates. A distance matrix was generated from the raw growth data (A 660) and subjected to multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. There was a significant correlation between substrate utilization profiles and MLSA genotypes. Both phenotypic and genotypic analyses indicated presence of a geographic structure for strains from Oxford and Auckland. Significant differences were also detected for MLSA genotypes between strains isolated from immature versus mature/senescent leaves. The fluorescent pseudomonads thus showed an ecotypic population structure, suggestive of adaptation to both geographic conditions and local plant niches.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas; multilocus sequence analysis; mutation; population structure; recombination; sugar beet; urocanate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32607204 PMCID: PMC7319117 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Oligonucleotide primers used in this study
| Primer | Sequences (5'–3') | Application |
|---|---|---|
| gapFSP | CGCAAYCCSGCSGAVCTGCC | Forward primer for |
| gapRSP | GTGTGRTTGGCRTCGAARATCGA | Reverse primer for |
| gltFSP | GAAAACTTCCTSCACATGATGTTC | Forward primer for |
| gltRP | GTMCGYGCCAGGGCGAAGAT | Reverse primer for |
| gltRS | TAGAAGTCSACGTTCGGGTA | Reverse primer for |
| acnFP | CGGTRCTSTGGTTCTTCGGCGACGAC | Forward primer for |
| acnRP | TTCTTCTCKACGGTCAGCAGGCC | Reverse primer for |
| acnFS | CCGATCTTCTAYAACACCATGGAAG | Forward primer for |
| acnRS | CCAGGTCRCGCAGGGTGATGCC | Reverse primer for |
FIGURE 1Rarefaction curves showing a near saturation of bacterial sampling. Each curve represents the mean of 1,000 replicates. Data of 95% confidence intervals are displayed with discontinuous lines
Diversity in three genetic loci in Pseudomonas populations
| Locus |
|
|
| Concatenated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (bp) | 303 | 339 | 255 | 897 |
| Number of sequence | 152 | 152 | 152 | 152 |
| Polymorphism (%) | 45.28 | 35.69 | 39.42 | 40.00 |
| Segregation sites | 23 | 21 | 18 | 59 |
| Spearman's | 65.331 | 48.949 | 29.000 | 0.0614 |
| Watterson's | 4.134 | 3.774 | 3.235 | 0.0118 |
| Rate of recombination to mutation ( | 15.8 | 12.9 | 9.0 | 5.22802 |
| LPT | .007 | .25 | .09 | .08 |
| Tajima's | 2.072 | 2.480 | 2.196 | 2.758 |
| Fu and Li's | 1.830 | 1.777 | 1.686 | 2.357 |
FIGURE 2Phylogenetic relationships of sugar beet‐associated Pseudomonas. Isolates from Oxford and Auckland are differentiated by blue and red colors, respectively. Six reference Pseudomonas species were included in the analysis. Asterisks indicate the few Oxford isolates in the Auckland cluster and vice versa
FIGURE 3Comparative analysis of Pseudomonas strains isolated from Oxford and Auckland. (a) Clonal frame output displayed as an unrooted network, indicating the origination of isolation. Distance was calculated using the NJ method with Kimura 2 correction. Sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of isolates. (b) Multidimensional scaling plot showing separation of Pseudomonas from Oxford (blue) and Auckland (green). (c) Nucleotide and amino acid polymorphism of the concatenated sequences by location. (d) Simpson's index of diversity (1‐D) calculated on the basis of unique STs and OTUs clustered at the level of 0.06. Error bars are 95% CIs
Analysis of recombination in Pseudomonas populations by location
| Oxford | Auckland | Total population | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unique STs | 44 + 0 (sharing) | 37 + 0 (sharing) | 81 |
| OTUs, 0.06 | 7 + 4 (sharing) | 11 + 4 (sharing) | 22 |
| Segregating sites | 64 | 109 | 59 |
|
| 0.0219 | 0.0293 | 0.0293 |
| Mutation rate, | 0.016403 | 0.029109 | 0.01175 |
| Recombination rate, | high | 0.031773 | 0.061429 |
| Rate of recombination to mutation ( | >10 | 1.09149 | 5.22789 |
| Tajima's | 1.571 | 1.645 | 2.758 |
| Fu and Li's | 1.990 | 2.000 | 2.357 |
| LPT, | .000 | .025 | .08 |
|
| .000 | .003 | .260 |
| Phi coefficient | 0.4675 | 0.5307 | 0.6880 |
| Phi, | .0000 | .1571 | .0776 |
FIGURE 4Evidence of recombination and structure of the Oxford and Auckland subpopulations. (a) Recombination breakpoints were detected using the method of GARD. Results of the Kishino–Hasegawa (KH) test are shown below the two detected breakpoints. Three asterisks indicate significance at P < 0.001. (b) Distribution of the six “ancestral” genotypes revealed by STRUCTURE analysis. (c) Individual isolates sharing ancestry for the Oxford and Auckland subpopulations. The ancestral genotypes are represented by different colours (b, c)
FIGURE 5Principal component analysis showing correlations between the MLSA genotypes and the Biolog phenotypes
FIGURE 6Genotypic relatedness of carbon source utilization (a) and the power of individual substrate in separating pseudomonads from Oxford and Auckland (b). (a) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) based on a Euclidean distance similarity matrix generated from the Biolog and MLSA data. The six “ancestral” populations revealed by STRUCTURE analysis are indicated as A to F, while X denotes the other ancestral types. Only carbon substrates with r value larger than .8 are shown. (b) Ratio of the mean value of bacterial growth (A 660) on each carbon source was calculated for isolates from Oxford and Auckland. The carbon substrates are listed in y‐axis in order to their location in the GN2 MicroPlate from A2 to H12 labeled from number 1 to 95. Red circles denote the eight carbon substrates of strong correlation with genotypes (Figure 6a)
FIGURE 7An unrooted phylogenetic tree showing the association of urocanate utilization with genotypes. The capability of bacterial growth on histidine (His) and urocanate (Uro) is marked in four different colors. The number of isolates showing the same phenotype is provided in a table below the tree, and percentage of each phenotype in the Auckland, Oxford, and total population is shown in parenthesis