| Literature DB >> 32607162 |
Naima C Starkloff1,2, Jeremy J Kirchman2, Andrew W Jones3, Benjamin M Winger4, Yen-Hua Huang1, Paulo C Pulgarín-R5,6, Wendy C Turner1.
Abstract
The latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) is an established macroecological pattern, but is poorly studied in microbial organisms, particularly parasites. In this study, we tested whether latitude, elevation, and host species predicted patterns of prevalence, alpha diversity, and community turnover of hemosporidian parasites. We expected parasite diversity to decrease with latitude, alongside the diversity of their hosts and vectors. Similarly, we expected infection prevalence to decrease with latitude as vector abundances decrease. Lastly, we expected parasite community turnover to increase with latitudinal distance and to be higher between rather than within host species. We tested these hypotheses by screening blood and tissue samples of three closely related avian species in a clade of North American songbirds (Turdidae: Catharus, n = 466) across 17.5° of latitude. We used a nested PCR approach to identify parasites in hemosporidian genera that are transmitted by different dipteran vectors. Then, we implemented linear-mixed effects and generalized dissimilarity models to evaluate the effects of latitude, elevation, and host species on parasite metrics. We found high diversity of hemosporidian parasites in Catharus thrushes (n = 44 lineages) but no evidence of latitudinal gradients in alpha diversity or prevalence. Parasites in the genus Leucocytozoon were most prevalent and lineage rich in this study system; however, there was limited turnover with latitude and host species. Contrastingly, Plasmodium parasites were less prevalent and diverse than Leucocytozoon parasites, yet communities turned over at a higher rate with latitude and host species. Leucocytozoon communities were skewed by the dominance of one or two highly prevalent lineages with broad latitudinal distributions. The few studies that evaluate the hemosporidian LDG do not find consistent patterns of prevalence and diversity, which makes it challenging to predict how they will respond to global climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Catharus; Leucocytozoon; avian malaria; community ecology; hemosporidia; latitudinal diversity gradient
Year: 2020 PMID: 32607162 PMCID: PMC7319150 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1The localities of 20 sampling sites (numbers correspond to sites in Table 1) and the breeding ranges of the three host species (Birdlife International & Nature Serve, 2014). The inset indicates the continental breeding ranges, and the red box within it shows the location of the 20 sampling sites. Only one species was sampled at each site, as they do not co‐occur, segregated based on elevation and latitude
Host species, latitude (°North), elevation (meters above sea level), sampling, raw lineage richness (α diversity), and raw infection prevalence (proportion of sample size infected) at 20 sites
| Site # | Host species | Site name | Mean latitude | Mean elevation | Sample size | Number of lineages | Infection prevalence | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| 1 | Veery | Appalachian Mountains, North Carolina | 35.51 | 1,306 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.89 |
| 2 | Veery | Allegheny Mountains, West Virginia | 38.67 | 1,132 | 20 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0.10 | 0.55 | 0.90 |
| 3 | Veery | Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania | 41.38 | 469 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.05 | 0.32 | 0.84 |
| 4 | Veery | Catskill Mountains, New York | 42.27 | 522 | 45 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.73 |
| 5 | Veery | Green Mountains, Vermont | 43.95 | 458 | 28 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.89 |
| 6 | Veery | Adirondack Mountains, New York | 44.13 | 472 | 21 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.95 |
| 7 | Veery | White Mountains, New Hampshire/Maine | 44.07 | 435 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 1.00 |
| 8 | Veery | Weyerhaeuser Timber, Maine | 45.53 | 360 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 1.00 |
| 9 | Bicknell's Thrush | Catskill Mountains, New York | 42.16 | 1,168 | 41 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.73 |
| 10 | Bicknell's Thrush | Green Mountains, Vermont | 44.13 | 1,141 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.81 |
| 11 | Bicknell's Thrush | Adirondack Mountains, New York | 44.18 | 1,221 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.88 |
| 12 | Bicknell's Thrush | White Mountains, New Hampshire/ Maine | 44.52 | 1,412 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.80 |
| 13 | Bicknell's Thrush | Mont Gosford, Quebec | 45.30 | 1,127 | 20 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.95 |
| 14 | Bicknell's Thrush | Massif du Sud, Quebec | 46.61 | 836 | 19 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0.16 | 0.32 | 1.00 |
| 15 | Bicknell's Thrush | Lac Poulin, Quebec | 47.91 | 923 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.90 |
| 16 | Bicknell's Thrush | Northern Nova Scotia | 47.06 | 32 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 1.00 |
| 17 | Bicknell's Thrush | Gaspésie, Quebec | 48.86 | 615 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.90 |
| 18 | Gray‐cheeked Thrush | Southern Newfoundland | 47.32 | 47 | 29 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.41 |
| 19 | Gray‐cheeked Thrush | Northern Newfoundland | 50.35 | 340 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0.47 | 0.13 | 0.60 |
| 20 | Gray‐cheeked Thrush | Labrador | 52.53 | 331 | 24 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.92 |
FIGURE 2Maximum‐likelihood phylogenetic tree of hemosporidian parasite lineages in three genera Haemoproteus, Plasmodium, and Leucocytozoon based on cytochrome‐b DNA sequences. Branch lengths were determined by nucleotide changes (scale top left). Bootstrapping to assess node support is displayed for nodes with support between 0.5 and 1. Bolded lineages are common (infecting more than five individuals and found at more than two sites) and grayed lineages were not previously named or documented. Infection prevalence (proportion infected) of each lineage in sites across the latitudinal gradient is indicated by the size of the boxes and colors of boxes represent the host species present in each site
FIGURE 3Mean hemosporidian alpha diversity (a) and prevalence by parasite genus (c) for each host species. Latitudinal variation in alpha diversity (b) and prevalence (d) by parasite genus for each host species. Alpha diversity is measured using the Shannon Diversity Index and prevalence was arcsine transformed. Only the variation in Plasmodium alpha diversity is supported by linear mixed‐effects models (Appendix S1)
FIGURE 4Fitted I‐splines of generalized dissimilarity models (partial regression fits) for community turnover with latitudinal distances in Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon (a). Maximum spline height provides an indication of the total turnover associated with latitude in each model. Mean turnover of Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon parasite communities between sites with the same host species (conspecific) or with different host species (heterospecific) (b). Variable importance (%) of each predictor in determining the turnover in Plasmodium (c) and Leucocytozoon (d) parasite communities. Variable importance is defined by the change in deviance explained when each predictor is permuted from the full model. The Gray‐cheeked Thrush was not included in this analysis
| Dependent variable | Variables included | AICc | ΔAICc | K | W |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| intercept only | 19.98 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.899 |
| host species | 24.86 | 4.88 | 5 | 0.078 | |
| host species + latitude | 28.32 | 8.35 | 6 | 0.014 | |
| latitude | 29.27 | 9.29 | 4 | 0.009 | |
| elevation | 38.60 | 18.62 | 4 | 0.000 | |
| host species + elevation | 41.28 | 21.30 | 6 | 0.000 | |
| host species *latitude | 44.58 | 24.61 | 8 | 0.000 | |
| latitude + elevation | 47.96 | 27.99 | 5 | 0.000 | |
| host species + latitude + elevation | 48.21 | 28.24 | 7 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude + elevation | 65.27 | 45.30 | 9 | 0.000 | |
|
| Intercept only | −8.26 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.934 |
| latitude | −2.72 | 5.54 | 4 | 0.058 | |
| host species | 1.29 | 9.55 | 5 | 0.008 | |
| host species+ latitude | 10.66 | 18.92 | 6 | 0.000 | |
| elevation | 11.83 | 20.09 | 4 | 0.000 | |
| latitude + elevation | 17.38 | 25.64 | 5 | 0.000 | |
| host species + elevation | 21.85 | 30.11 | 6 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude | 29.38 | 37.63 | 8 | 0.000 | |
| host species + latitude + elevation | 31.65 | 39.90 | 7 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude + elevation | 52.01 | 60.27 | 9 | 0.000 | |
|
| Intercept only | 80.09 | 0.00 | 3 | 0.735 |
| host species | 83.97 | 3.87 | 5 | 0.106 | |
| latitude | 83.97 | 3.88 | 4 | 0.106 | |
| host species + latitude | 85.42 | 5.33 | 6 | 0.051 | |
| host species*latitude | 92.95 | 12.86 | 8 | 0.001 | |
| elevation | 95.69 | 15.60 | 4 | 0.000 | |
| host species + latitude + elevation | 97.81 | 17.72 | 7 | 0.000 | |
| latitude + elevation | 99.28 | 19.19 | 5 | 0.000 | |
| host species + elevation | 100.06 | 19.97 | 6 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude + elevation | 108.39 | 28.30 | 9 | 0.000 | |
|
| Host species | 83.02 | 0.00 | 5 | 0.701 |
| intercept only | 85.09 | 2.07 | 3 | 0.249 | |
| host species + latitude | 89.29 | 6.26 | 6 | 0.031 | |
| latitude | 90.28 | 7.25 | 4 | 0.019 | |
| host species + elevation | 99.04 | 16.02 | 6 | 0.000 | |
| elevation | 99.19 | 16.16 | 4 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude | 99.29 | 16.27 | 8 | 0.000 | |
| latitude + elevation | 102.51 | 19.49 | 5 | 0.000 | |
| host species + latitude + elevation | 105.20 | 22.18 | 7 | 0.000 | |
| host species*latitude + elevation | 116.03 | 33.00 | 9 | 0.000 |