Robin Park1, Shahid Umar2, Anup Kasi3. 1. Department of Medicine, MetroWest Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Framingham, MA, U.S.A. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Surgery, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, U.S.A. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, U.S.A.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the role of the microbiome in colorectal cancer (CRC) in the setting of immunotherapy and emphasizes the potential of microbiota-influencing strategies with a focus on the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). RECENT FINDINGS: Observations from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that the human gut microbiome is implicated in the CRC carcinogenesis and is integral in determining the clinical response and toxicity to immunotherapy. Among the therapeutic methods devised to exploit the microbiome, FMT is the most direct method and is backed by the highest level of evidence of efficacy in nonneoplastic disease settings. Furthermore, a favorable microbiome has the potential to overcome immunotherapy resistance and ameliorate immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To this end, clinical trials are underway to evaluate the potential of FMT and microbiota-augmented methods in the setting of immunotherapy in CRC. SUMMARY: Evidence from animal studies, retrospective studies, and smaller-scale prospective human studies have led to initiation of a number of microbiota-augmented clinical trials in CRC. Given the intimate relationship between the gut microbiota and the immune system as well as antitumor immune responses, potentiating immunotherapy and managing its toxicity are major areas of research in microbiota-augmented therapies in cancer. Therefore, evaluation of the patient microbiome as a routine part of clinical outcome analysis is warranted in future clinical trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the role of the microbiome in colorectal cancer (CRC) in the setting of immunotherapy and emphasizes the potential of microbiota-influencing strategies with a focus on the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). RECENT FINDINGS: Observations from preclinical and clinical studies suggest that the human gut microbiome is implicated in the CRC carcinogenesis and is integral in determining the clinical response and toxicity to immunotherapy. Among the therapeutic methods devised to exploit the microbiome, FMT is the most direct method and is backed by the highest level of evidence of efficacy in nonneoplastic disease settings. Furthermore, a favorable microbiome has the potential to overcome immunotherapy resistance and ameliorate immune-related adverse events (irAEs). To this end, clinical trials are underway to evaluate the potential of FMT and microbiota-augmented methods in the setting of immunotherapy in CRC. SUMMARY: Evidence from animal studies, retrospective studies, and smaller-scale prospective human studies have led to initiation of a number of microbiota-augmented clinical trials in CRC. Given the intimate relationship between the gut microbiota and the immune system as well as antitumor immune responses, potentiating immunotherapy and managing its toxicity are major areas of research in microbiota-augmented therapies in cancer. Therefore, evaluation of the patient microbiome as a routine part of clinical outcome analysis is warranted in future clinical trials.
Authors: Bret D Wallace; Hongwei Wang; Kimberly T Lane; John E Scott; Jillian Orans; Ja Seol Koo; Madhukumar Venkatesh; Christian Jobin; Li-An Yeh; Sridhar Mani; Matthew R Redinbo Journal: Science Date: 2010-11-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Julie R Brahmer; Christina Lacchetti; Bryan J Schneider; Michael B Atkins; Kelly J Brassil; Jeffrey M Caterino; Ian Chau; Marc S Ernstoff; Jennifer M Gardner; Pamela Ginex; Sigrun Hallmeyer; Jennifer Holter Chakrabarty; Natasha B Leighl; Jennifer S Mammen; David F McDermott; Aung Naing; Loretta J Nastoupil; Tanyanika Phillips; Laura D Porter; Igor Puzanov; Cristina A Reichner; Bianca D Santomasso; Carole Seigel; Alexander Spira; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Yinghong Wang; Jeffrey S Weber; Jedd D Wolchok; John A Thompson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Noriho Iida; Amiran Dzutsev; C Andrew Stewart; Loretta Smith; Nicolas Bouladoux; Rebecca A Weingarten; Daniel A Molina; Rosalba Salcedo; Timothy Back; Sarah Cramer; Ren-Ming Dai; Hiu Kiu; Marco Cardone; Shruti Naik; Anil K Patri; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; Karen M Frank; Yasmine Belkaid; Giorgio Trinchieri; Romina S Goldszmid Journal: Science Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sabine Venderbosch; Iris D Nagtegaal; Tim S Maughan; Christopher G Smith; Jeremy P Cheadle; David Fisher; Richard Kaplan; Philip Quirke; Matthew T Seymour; Susan D Richman; Gerrit A Meijer; Bauke Ylstra; Danielle A M Heideman; Anton F J de Haan; Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zhen He; Raad Z Gharaibeh; Rachel C Newsome; Jllian L Pope; Michael W Dougherty; Sarah Tomkovich; Benoit Pons; Gladys Mirey; Julien Vignard; David R Hendrixson; Christian Jobin Journal: Gut Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 23.059