| Literature DB >> 32607032 |
Naseh Pahlavani1, Sayyed Saeid Khayyatzadeh2,3, Vahideh Banazadeh1, Mohammad Bagherniya4, Maryam Tayefi5, Saeid Eslami6, Gordon A Ferns7, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The beneficial impact of adherence to a DASH diet on several metabolic conditions and psychological well-being has been shown previously. Dietary modification can affect sleep quality. Thus, the aim of this present study was to investigate the correlation between adherence to the DASH diet and daytime sleepiness score in adolescent girls.Entities:
Keywords: DASH diet; adolescents; daytime functioning; sleep
Year: 2020 PMID: 32607032 PMCID: PMC7292369 DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S246991
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Sci Sleep ISSN: 1179-1608
Descriptive Characteristics of Study Participants by Quartiles of DASH-Diet Style
| Quartiles of DASH Score (Ranged from 8 to 40) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | |||
| Age (y) | 14.8±1.5 | 14.7±1.5 | 14.4±1.5 | 14.1±1.6 | 0.005 | |
| Physical activity (MET. h/day) | 6.4±0.51 | 6.4±0.38 | 6.4±0.52 | 6.4±0.51 | 0.89 | |
| Passive smoker (%) | 26.4 | 20.9 | 23.5 | 15.5 | 0.23 | |
| Menstruation (%) | 90.5 | 90.7 | 86.9 | 81 | 0.2 | |
| BMI percentile (%) | < 3 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.37 |
| 3–85 | 82.2 | 80 | 79.9 | 72.4 | ||
| 85–95 | 9.6 | 10.4 | 9.7 | 17.2 | ||
| >95 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 9.6 | 9.3 | ||
| Depression score | 11.6±8.1 | 10.7±7.8 | 9.4±7.3 | 8.6±7.1 | 0.01 | |
| Parent death (%) | 5.1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 4 | 0.99 | |
| Parent divorce (%) | 7 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 3 | 0.81 | |
Note: *One-way ANOVA and chi-squared analyses were used to test the trend of continuous and categorical variables, respectively, across the quartiles of DASH score.
Food and Nutrient Intakes of Adolescents According to Quartiles of DASH-Type Diet
| Quartiles of DASH Score (Ranged from 8 to 40) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
| 20 | 23 | 26 | 29 | ||
| Fruits (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.48±0.38 | 0.57±0.45 | 0.81±0.57 | 0.8±0.42 | <0.001 |
| Vegetables (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.57±0.35 | 0.73±0.57 | 0.76±0.44 | 0.94±0.48 | <0.001 |
| Nuts, legume, seed (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.32±0.44 | 0.47±0.52 | 0.55±0.56 | 0.59±0.58 | <0.001 |
| Low fat dairy (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.23±0.24 | 0.34±0.27 | 0.4±0.25 | 0.44±0.29 | <0.001 |
| Whole grain (serving/1000Kcal) | 2.2±2.2 | 2.5±2.2 | 2.9±2.04 | 3.5±2.08 | <0.001 |
| Red and processed meat (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.32±0.22 | 0.28±0.31 | 0.23±0.23 | 0.14±0.09 | <0.001 |
| Sweetened beverage (serving/1000Kcal) | 0.17±0.21 | 0.14±0.21 | 0.12±0.19 | 0.04±0.06 | <0.001 |
| Sodium (milligram/1000Kcal) | 1692±539 | 1515±449 | 1493±516 | 1420±332 | <0.001 |
| Fish (g/1000 Kcal) | 2.8±3.3 | 2.3±2.6 | 2.9±4.03 | 4.1±5.2 | 0.01 |
| Spices (g/1000Kcal) | 1.17±1.15 | 1.07±1.21 | 0.96±1.2 | 0.79±0.78 | 0.007 |
| Eggs (g/1000Kcal) | 7.2±7.7 | 8.2±8.7 | 7.4±6.2 | 7.8±5.9 | 0.28 |
| Refined grains (g/1000 Kcal) | 125.6±68.4 | 114.3±67.7 | 105.6±55.4 | 98.7±47.6 | <0.001 |
| Total energy (Kcal) | 2537±681 | 2563±659 | 2681±658 | 2672±766 | 0.04 |
| Protein (%) | 12.8±2.4 | 13.4±2.2 | 13.8±1.9 | 14.7±2.1 | 0.05 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 52.7±7.9 | 54.3±7.6 | 55.5±6.7 | 57±6.7 | 0.04 |
| Total fat (%) | 36.2±8.8 | 34.3±8 | 33±6.6 | 31±7 | <0.001 |
| Sucrose (g/1000Kcal) | 8.5±5.6 | 9.08±6.4 | 8.3±4.1 | 7.9±4.9 | 0.22 |
| Dietary fiber (g/1000 Kcal) | 15.8±6.4 | 16.7±6.5 | 16.2±5.1 | 18.2±5.2 | 0.009 |
| Vitamin C (mg/1000 Kcal) | 28.7±14.4 | 34.3±22.6 | 40.2±23.6 | 41.6±23.5 | <0.001 |
| Folate (mcg/1000Kcal) | 221.3±48.3 | 229.9±53.9 | 225.6±42.7 | 244.6±48.3 | 0.002 |
| Vitamin A (mcg/1000Kcal) | 184.5±84.5 | 213.1±120.1 | 220.5±95.7 | 258.1±119.1 | <0.001 |
| Vitamin D (mcg/1000Kcal) | 0.74±0.63 | 0.82±0.67 | 0.83±0.51 | 1.06±0.77 | <0.001 |
| Potassium (mg/1000Kcal) | 1242±242 | 1362±273 | 1439±265 | 1539±252.5 | <0.001 |
| Calcium (mg/1000Kcal) | 380.3±130.1 | 428.6±141.9 | 453.6±125.5 | 477.6±141.5 | <0.001 |
| Magnesium (mg/1000Kcal) | 158.7±39.6 | 177.3±36.3 | 191.4±34.8 | 211.9±34.4 | <0.001 |
Notes: Data reported as mean ± SD; *Linear regression was used to test the trend of continuous variables according to quartile.
Linear Regression Analysis of the Correlations Between DASH-Diet Style and Daytime Sleepiness
| Crude | −0.12 | 0.005 |
| Model I | −0.11 | 0.01 |
| Model II | −0.08 | 0.04 |
Notes: Model I, Adjusted for age, energy intake; Model II, Additionally adjusted for physical activity and BMI.