Effects of Aerobic Exercise Protocol on Genes Related to Insulin Resistance and Inflammation in the Pancreas of ob/ob Mice with NAFLD.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of aerobic training on insulin resistance and inflammatory response in obese mice (ob/ob) with NAFLD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male ob/ob mice were randomly divided into sedentary (n=7) and trained (n=7) groups. Aerobic training consisted of 5 weekly sessions, 60 min per session at 60% of the maximum speed of the running test. Hepatic and pancreatic samples were collected to evaluate histological features and gene expression associated with insulin resistance and inflammatory response after 8-week experiment protocol. RNA was performed by TRIzol®. PCR experiments were performed using the Rotor-Gene RG-3000. Parametric data were assessed by t-test, one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Non-parametric data were assessed by the Mann-Whitney tests with Dunn's post-test of multiple comparisons. Histological analysis was assessed by chi-square test with Fisher's exact test. Significant variables were considered when p<0.05. All the analyses were performed by GraphPad Prism V6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc.).
RESULTS: Reductions in bodyweight (p = 0.008), weight evolution (p = 0.03), food intake (p <0.0001) and fat content were observed in trained group. Moreover, the trained group showed better results in peak velocity (p=0.03) physical effort tolerance (p=0.006) and distance (p=0.01). Gene expression showed differences in IL-10 (p=0.03) and GLUT-2 (p=0.03) in hepatic analysis, between groups. Pancreatic gene expression showed difference between groups in IRS-2 (p=0.004), GLUT-2 (p=0.03) and IL-10 (p=0.008) analysis. Also, the trained group showed lower values for interlobular fat and inflammatory infiltrate in histological analysis when compared to sedentary animals.
CONCLUSION: An 8-week physical training protocol was able to attenuate bodyweight gain, food intake and generate positive effects on gene expression related to insulin resistance and inflammation in both liver and pancreas of ob/ob mice.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a wide spectrum of hepatic modifications ranging from simple steatosis, without inflammation or fibrosis, to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of alcohol consumption. It is considered the most common hepatic manifestation in Western population.1

Insulin resistance has been characterized as the crucial pathophysiological factor in NAFLD.2 Both hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance have strong correlation with NAFLD, regardless of disease severity.3 Pathophysiological processes of NAFLD involve other organs including the pancreas. Excessive accumulation of ectopic fat in the pancreas is referred to as pancreatic steatosis or non-alcoholic fatty pancreatic disease (NAFPD).4 In recent years, it has become an increasingly recognized condition, being present in about 67% of patients with NAFLD.5 Animal studies demonstrate that long-term exposure to a hyperlipidic diet induces accumulation of interlobular and intralobular fat, infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis in the pancreas and pancreatic islets dysfunction.6 In addition, NAFPD is associated with other clinical conditions such as insulin resistance, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and obesity.7,8

Leptin deficient obese mice (ob/ob mice) are characterized by an excessive intake of nutrients and deficiency to leptin, which in turn, acts on these animals in determining the phenotype of obesity, hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia,9,10 being used in studies evaluating pathophysiological conditions such as: diabetes, obesity, inflammatory response and insulin resistance. The metabolic condition of ob/ob mice induces redistribution in body fat storage, non-fat tissues and hepatic content, making it a potential model for the study of NAFLD.

Aerobic exercise training (AET) has been widely used for the prevention and treatment of obesity, insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) because it is able to improve mitochondrial function and fatty acid oxidation11,12 improves insulin sensitivity and glucose uptake in the skeletal muscle and ameliorates inflammatory response.13 It is highly supported by the American Gastroenterological Association and American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases that chronic aerobic exercise is a major component and plays a fundamental role in the treatment for NAFLD being considered as first-line treatment, however, the underlying mechanisms associated with disease progression are not fully understood. Therefore, the present study proposes to evaluate the effect of physical training on markers of inflammatory response and insulin resistance in ob/ob mice with NAFLD.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male ob/ob mice (8 weeks old) were randomly divided into sedentary group (SED; n=7) and trained group (TF; n=7), kept under the same housing conditions (light/dark cycles of 12 hours at 22 ± 2 ° C and controlled ventilation), with water and food ad libitum. The present study followed the recommended guidelines of the Animal Experimentation Service of the Medical School of the University of São Paulo and was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (CEUA).

Running Capacity Test

Running capacity was assessed before, in the fourth and eighth weeks of aerobic exercise training (AET) using a progressive test without inclination on a treadmill. The initial speed was 0.4 km/h and the speed was increased by 0.2 km/h every three minutes until exhaustion of the animal, which was characterized by the impossibility of maintaining the standard rate. This protocol and its procedures were previously tested and validated by Ferreira.14

Aerobic Exercise Protocol

Aerobic exercise protocol was performed on a treadmill, 5 times a week, during 8 weeks. All training sessions had established intensities of 60% of running capacity maximum speed, and time being progressively increased, starting with 30 minutes in the first week and reaching 60 minutes in the fourth week, as described by Ferreira. After the fourth week, all sessions lasted 60 minutes. To minimize the influence of treadmill stress, the sedentary animals were placed on the treadmill for 10 min once a week at 0.3 km/h during the experimental protocol.

Bodyweight and Food Intake

Bodyweight was weekly measured in a digital balance (Gehaka/BG4001, Sao Paulo, Brazil) at the same time of day. Bodyweight evolution and bodyweight gain were calculated by the difference between the final bodyweight (week 8) and initial bodyweight (week 0). The 24-h water and food intake were determined weekly throughout the study in mice that were housed at three or four animals per cage. Also, the animals had free access to water and food ad libitum. A Nuvilab CR1 branded feed was used for a standard diet for both study groups.

Histological Analysis

Hepatic samples were collected from segments ll and lll of left lobe, which is more related to the onset and progression of NAFLD.15,16 Pancreatic samples were collected from the portion near the duodenum. Both tissues were fixed in 4% formalin solution, processed and submitted to hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The histological slides of each tissue were evaluated in a “blind” way by an experienced pathologist. In the liver, we used a modified rodent score system proposed by Liang.17 The histological variables present in this system are: macrovesicular steatosis (0–3), microvesicular steatosis (0–3), hepatocellular hypertrophy (0–3) and foci of inflammation (0–3). The sum for steatosis ranges from 0 to 9.

Since there is no specific and validated score system for pancreatic analyses, the histological variables were: interlobular fat, intralobular fat, fibrosis, edema, acinar necrosis, inflammatory infiltrate, hemorrhage and fat necrosis.

RNA Quantification

Total RNA was extracted from liver and pancreas using TRIzol reagent according to the product’s technical specifications (Invitrogen Life Technologies, USA). RNA integrity was evaluated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometer quantification at 260 and 280nm. Samples whose ratio A260/280 were between 1.8 and 2.0 were used. RT-qPCR (Table 1) reactions were performed on the Rotor-Gene RG-3000 equipment (Corbett Research, Sydney, Australia) using SuperScript™ Platinum® One-Step Quantitative RT-PCR System reagents (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) as recommended by the manufacturer. All RT-q PCR reactions were performed in duplicate for each tissue sample for both the target gene and the endogenous control (β-actin).

Table 1

Primers Sequence (Forward/Reverse) Used in the qRT-PCR Reaction for Each Gene Studied

Genes	Sequence
IRS-2	F: CGG CTG GAG TAC TAC GAG AG
	R: CGC GCT TGT TGA TGT TCA GA
GLUT-2	F: TCA GAA GAC AGG GTA CAG CGA
	R: TCC AGT GCC AGC GTA TAA GT
TNF-α	F: CCA CCA CGC TCT TCT GTC TA
	R: TCC TTC TTG CCC TCC TAA CC
IL-6	F: TTC TTG GGA CTG ATG CTG GT
	R: CAG GTC TGT TGG GAG TGG TA
IL-10	F: TGC TGC TCC TCC CCT ATT TC
	R: TTC GGA TGT GCC TGG GTT TA
Β-actin	F: TGT CAC CAA CTG GGA CGA TA
	R: GGG GTG TTG AAG GTC TCA AA

Abbreviations: F, forward; R, reverse.

2−ΔΔCT Method was used for relative quantification. Ct (“threshold cycle”) is the real-time PCR cycle, where amplification reaches the logarithmic phase. ΔCt is the difference in expression between target gene and endogenous control of a given sample and ΔΔCt corresponds to the difference between the ΔCt of the sample and the ΔCt of the control.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean or median (depending on the distribution of the variables) and their respective minimum (min), maximum (max) and standard deviation (SD) values. For parametric distribution variables, we used t-test, one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test with multiple comparisons. For non-parametric distribution variables, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-test of multiple comparisons were used. We used chi-square test with Fisher’s exact test for histological scores between groups. For all statistical analysis, significance was set at p<0.05. All analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism V6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc.).

Results

Before the aerobic exercise protocol, no differences in running capacity test were observed between groups, however, at the end of the protocol, differences were observed for peak velocity, distance and time of exposure to the exercise test between groups (Figure 1). Data obtained in the fourth week were used only to adjust the intensity of PT (not shown).

Figure 1

Data obtained from running capacity test of ob/ob mice after 8 weeks of aerobic exercise protocol.

Bodyweight and Food Intake

Before the training protocol, no significant differences were observed between groups; however, after 8 weeks of protocol, significant differences were observed in the mean bodyweight of trained animals (TF: 12.9±2.9 vs SED: 9.6±2.1 p=0.008). In addition, bodyweight gain analysis showed significant differences between groups from the third week of training (Figure 2). Sedentary animals obtained an average weight gain of 35% during the whole experimental protocol while the animals submitted to aerobic training obtained 26%. Also, significant differences were found in both food and water intake (Table 2). In both analyses, sedentary animals presented higher values compared to trained animals (Table 2).

Figure 2

Average bodyweight and bodyweight gain during 8-week aerobic physical training protocol of both study groups.

Table 2

Bodyweight Gain and Food Intake at the End of the Experimental Protocol

Variables	Sedentary Group (n=7)	Trained Group (n=7)	P
Bodyweight gain (g)	12.9±2.9	9.6±2.1	0.008
Weight gain (%)	35.6±10.1	26.8±6.5	0.03
Water intake	6.6±1.5	4.9±1.2	0.001
Food intake	5.6±1.1	4.4±0.9	<0.0001

Note: p<0.05.

Adipose Tissue and Hepatic Weight

Table 3 shows the main differences between groups after 8 weeks or aerobic exercise protocol. Statistical analysis showed that trained animals had lower values for hepatic weight (both absolute and relative weight analysis) and retroperitoneal adipose tissue (both absolute and relative weight)

Table 3

Adipose Tissues and Hepatic Weight of ob/ob Mice from Both Groups at the End of the Aerobic Exercise Protocol (Absolute and Relative Weight)

Variables	Sedentary (n=7)	Trained (n=7)	P
Absolute weight
Liver (gr)	2.5±0.3	2.2±0.2	0.04
Peritoneal adipose tissue (gr)	2.5 (2.0–5.5)	1.5 (1.5–4.0)	0.03
Inguinal adipose tissue (gr)	2.4±0.6	1.8±0.8	0.10
Periepididimal adipose tissue (gr)	3.0±1.3	2.9±0.9	0.87
Relative weight
Liver (mg)	54.0±4.8	50.3±5.3	0.04
Peritoneal adipose tissue (mg)	59.5 (40.0–103.1)	36.1 (32.6–93.0)	0.04
Inguinal adipose tissue (mg)	51.5±15.9	42.5±20.1	0.49
Periepididimal adipose tissue (mg)	64.4±32.1	66.4±18.9	0.88

Note: p<0.05.

Abbreviations: Gr, grams; mg, milligrams.

Liver Histology

Histological analysis in the liver showed no significant differences for macrovesicular steatosis, microvesicular steatosis, hepatocellular hypertrophy, and inflammatory foci (Table 4). Only a few differences can be observed between groups through images (Figure 3).

Table 4

Histologic Features of Hepatic Tissue in ob/ob Mice

	Sedentary* (n=4)				Trained* (n=4)				P
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Macrovesicular steatosis (0–3)	0	2	1	2	1	2	2	0	0.965
Microvesicular steatosis (0–3)	0	3	2	3	2	3	2	3
Hepatocellular hypertrophy (0–3)	0	2	2	2	1	2	1	2
Inflammatory foci (0–3)	0	2	3	3	2	2	3	0

Note: *Microchip identification.

Figure 3

Liver histology of ob/ob mice. (A and B) Liver histology of sedentary animals (100 µm scale). (C and D) Liver histology of trained animals (100 µm scale).

Pancreatic Histology

Due to the absence of a specific pancreas score, the group performed a descriptive table. The following variables were analyzed: interlobular fat, intralobular fat, fibrosis, edema, acinar necrosis, inflammatory infiltrate, hemorrhage and fat necrosis. The following table describes the characteristics of each animal evaluated (Table 5). Through histological images, it was observed morphological preservation of both pancreatic tissue and organ (Figures 4 and 5), and no signs of fat infiltration (Figures 6 and 7).

Table 5

Description of Pancreatic Histological Analysis Performed in Both Study Groups After 8 Weeks of Aerobic Exercise Protocol

	Animal (ID)	Interlobular Fat	Intralobular Fat	Fibrosis	Edema	Acinar Necrosis	Inflammatory Infiltrate	Bleeding	Fat Necrosis	Final Score
Sedentary (n=7)	0354	0 (5%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	1010	3 (40%)	0	0	0	0	11–15 pmn	0	0	0
	0493	3 (40%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	1840	0 (5%)	0	0	0	0	11–15 pmn	0	0	0
	0253	0 (5%)	0	0	0	0	0–1 pmn	0	0	2
	1053	0 (5%)	0	0	0	0	0–1 pmn	0	0	0
	2118	0 (2%)	0	0	0	0	0–1 pmn	0	0	0
Trained (n=7)	0370	0 (0%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	0678	1 (10%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1
	0957	0 (0%)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	0420	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
	0529	1 (10%)	0	0	0	0	0–1 pmn	0	0	1
	1581	3 (40%)	0	0	0	0	0–1 pmn	0	0	0
	7796	3 (40%)	0	0	0	0	2–5 pmn	1	0	–

Figure 4

Pancreatic histology of sedentary ob/ob mouse without fat infiltration. 1 = Langerhans islet; 2 = blood vessel (original magnification ×40).

Figure 5

Panoramic view of the sedentary ob/ob mouse pancreas with preserved morphology and tissue (original magnification ×20).

Figure 6

Sedentary ob/ob mouse pancreatic accino. Presence of rare lymphocytes (arrow) in loose periacinar tissue (original magnification ×40).

Figure 7

ob/ob trained mouse pancreas with visceral fat adjacent (arrow) to pancreatic parenchyma with no signs of lobular infiltration (original magnification ×5).

Gene Expression

Hepatic Tissue

Hepatic gene expression showed statistical differences between sedentary and trained for GLUT-2 (1.5±0.6 vs 0.7±0.3) (Figure 8). For inflammation analysis, differences were found for IL-6 (1.1 (0.3–1.9) vs 3.6 (0.7–5.3)) and IL-10 (0.7 (0.2–2.7) vs 1.3 (0.6–3.6)) (Figure 9). For the other genes, no significant differences were observed.

Figure 8

Hepatic expression of genes related to insulin resistance between groups.

Figure 9

Hepatic expression of genes related to inflammation between groups.

Pancreatic Tissue

Analysis of pancreatic gene expression, for insulin resistance, showed statistical differences between groups for IRS-2 (0.3 (0.1–0.9) vs 1.7 (0.7–5.2)) and GLUT-2 (0.5±0.3 vs 1.8±1.3) (Figure 10). Pancreatic genes related to inflammation showed statistical difference for IL-6 (0.07 (0.04–0.10) vs 3.1 (0.9–3.9)) and IL-10 (0.7 (0.4–1.7) vs 6.1 (1.1–14.3)) (Figure 11). No statistical differences observed for the other genes.

Figure 10

Pancreatic expression of genes related to insulin resistance between groups.

Figure 11

Pancreatic expression of genes related to inflammation between groups.

Discussion

In the present study, the physical training attenuated the evolution in the bodyweight gain of the trained animals from the 3rd week showing an important metabolic impact on these animals (Figure 1). In addition, at the end of the protocol, sedentary animals presented a 35% weight gain percentage while trained animals presented a 26% percentage. Evangelista18 observed that aerobic training improved aspects related to bodyweight control and energy balance in obese mice (ob/ob mice) showing that the trained animals obtained a 23% increase in weight gain and sedentary animals 41%. In previous studies, physical training was able to control bodyweight gain in wild mice and animals fed high-fat cafeteria diet,19,20 and improvements insulin resistance, lipid metabolism, and greater tolerance to physical exercise.21

Regarding the water and food intake, we expected to find an increased food consumption of animals exposed to physical training, however, our results showed that trained animals had lower values for both water and food intake (Table 2). A possible explanation for this result may be the impact that continuous physical exercise causes on physiological processes. Physical exercise produces adjustments in blood flow, gastrointestinal hormone response, gastric emptying, muscle cell metabolism, adipose tissue biochemistry, and brain activity, this change may have interfered with some of the mechanisms involved in appetite control.22,23

Our results showed that the trained group had an increase in peak velocity in the pre-training moment compared to the post-training moment, showing that aerobic exercise was effective in improving this variable (Figure 1), corroborating with other authors as Evangelista,18 Higa,20 and Gollish.21 The increase in the peak velocity of these animals implies cardiorespiratory improvements and better oxidation capacity of skeletal muscle. Indeed, the oxidative capacity of skeletal muscle is a determining factor for exercise tolerance.24 Possible mechanisms induced by aerobic training that result in better oxidative metabolism are increases in the rate of glucose transport in skeletal muscle and in the transport of fatty acids to mitochondria.25

It is known that weight loss through lifestyle modifications reduces both visceral adipose tissue and liver fat content. 5% to 10% of weight loss is desirable for clinically significant reductions in visceral adipose tissue and for hepatic histological improvements (65% improvement in NAS score with weight loss>10%).26,27 In our study, the animals did not lose weight during the physical training protocol, so it was not possible to observe significant differences for liver histological analysis (Table 4). Studies indicate that although there is no weight loss through physical exercise, it is possible to observe positive effects on metabolic aspects in NAFLD and insulin resistance state.28,29 Therefore, regular exercise should be encouraged in the NAFLD population even if there are no significant changes in liver histology.

Since there is no specific histological score tool for the pancreas, our group performed a descriptive table of the analyzed data (Table 5). Through histopathological analysis, it was possible to observe that the trained animals had a slight decrease in pancreatic inflammation. A study by Mathur30 compared the differences between the pancreatic characteristics of ob/ob mice and their C57BL/6J (lean model). Histopathological results showed no statistical differences between groups, however obese animals had higher values in pancreatic fat content. However, more studies are needed involving interventions related to regular physical activity and physical exercise related to pancreatic fat infiltration, histologic analysis and features related to NAFLD.

The exposure to physical training, regardless of modality, is responsible to provide improvements in aspects related to insulin and glucose.31 Indeed, our group found significant differences in gene expression for IRS-2 and GLUT-2 (Figure 11) in the pancreas, ie, exposure to physical exercise was able to increase the expression of these genes, leading to improvements in both insulin receptors and glucose uptake. On the other hand, the increased expression of IRS-2 and GLUT-2 in the liver have different meanings when compared to the pancreas. It has been reported in animal studies that GLUT-2 expression is increased in response to hyperglycemia and decreased by hyperinsulinemia.32,33 In diabetic Wistars, an increase in hepatic GLUT-2 mRNA was observed, and this change was restored by the correction of glycemia by florizine, vanadium or insulin.34,35 Other studies in rat livers showed that GLUT-2 protein and mRNA increased 1.6 and 2-fold, respectively, after 3 weeks of diabetes,36,37 with a reverse response when these animals were exposed to insulin treatment for 5 days presenting gene levels similar to non-diabetic animals.37 Silva,38 showed that after 20 days of treatment with alloxan, Wistar rats showed a lower weight gain than the control group. In liver tissue, diabetes also promoted increased expression of GLUT-2, which was reversed with insulin administration. In our study, the exercise group had lower GLUT-2 expression values compared to the sedentary group (Figure 9), being similar to non-diabetes condition. Moreover, our results corroborate the findings of Silva showing that regular exercise, although not showing significant improvements in liver histology, acts on this organ with the same effect as synthetic insulin, contributing in the long term to improvements in aspects of NAFLD in both liver and pancreas.

Since physical exercise can significantly affect cellular homeostasis, it is not surprising that exercise increases plasma levels of various cytokines, including IL-6. Studies show that muscle contraction rapidly increases the expression of the IL-6 gene in skeletal muscles in rats39 and humans40,41 during prolonged exercises.39,42 Our findings for IL-6 in both organs were increased compared to sedentary animals (Figures 9 and 11). The first hint that IL-6 might also exert beneficial roles on the metabolism came from the observation that mice deficient for IL-6 (IL-6-/-) developed mature-onset diabetes with increased leptin and insulin levels, liver inflammation and hepato steatosis, in particular when fed a HFD.43,44 Interestingly, glucose homeostasis in these mice could be restored after TNF-a-inhibition or Kupffercell-depletion.45 In addition, increase in insulin sensitivity through upregulation of IRS-2 by adiponectin, a well-recognized anti-diabetic cytokine has been shown to be IL-6 mediated.46,47 These data show that IL-6 in the liver not only regulates glucose metabolism but is also necessary to maintain liver tissue homeostasis for proper control of metabolic functions. We believe that this increase was due to exposure to exercise, since it has a long duration and high muscle contraction. In addition, the TNF-α results of animals trained in both organs were lower compared to sedentary animals, although no significant differences were found. We believe that the increase in IL-6 expression was responsible for stimulating the activity of Interleukin 10 (IL-10), which in turn is able to inhibit the production of exacerbated circulating TNF-α. However, this hypothesis cannot be proven because it was not the objective of the present study.

Regarding IL-10, further studies in rodents fed a high-fat diet have shown that the presence of NAFLD and hyperglycemia was followed by low systemic IL-10 levels, leading to the proposition that IL-10 may have the ability to prevent hepatic steatosis and other metabolic abnormalities.48 Speretta49 evaluated the effect of eight weeks of high intensity/short duration strength training and moderate/long duration aerobic training on TNF-α and IL-10 gene expression and lipid profile. Regardless of exercise modality, animals undergoing physical training showed significant improvements in both TNF-a, IL-10 expression, as well as improvements in lipid profile and visceral fat content in their different compartments. These findings reinforce the idea that regular exercise generates potential benefits in controlling and maintaining not only the lipid profile, but also in improving IL-10 expression and inhibiting TNF-a expression. In our study, trained animals had higher IL-10 expression levels compared to sedentary animals (Figures 9 and 11). It is possible to state that the aerobic exercise training protocol had positive effects on the anti-inflammatory response, mainly in the pancreas of trained ob/ob animals and consequently, the improvement of IL-10 expression in these animals also favored the improvement and maintenance of the sensitivity to insulin, since this cytokine is strongly related to this phenomenon.

Conclusion

Eight-week aerobic exercise training protocol was able to promote positive modifications in both the liver and pancreas IRS-2 and GLUT-2 genes, as well as improvements in the expression of IL-10, conferring a protective factor on both organs. The study also showed that through this protocol, there was attenuation in the bodyweight gain of obese mice, improvements in food intake and increased exercise tolerance. Regarding the histopathological characteristics, it was not possible to observe a decrease in liver scores whereas in the pancreas, although no statistical differences were evidenced, the mice submitted to the aerobic training protocol presented lower histological values, especially in inflammatory infiltrate aspects.