| Literature DB >> 32606281 |
Akram Abdo Almansoori1,2,3,4, Namuun Khentii1, Kyung Won Ju3, Bongju Kim3,4, Soung Min Kim1,4, Jong-Ho Lee1,3,4,5.
Abstract
Objectives: We compared the outcomes of two different doses of FK506 (tacrolimus) for immunosuppression in submandibular salivary gland (SMG) allotransplantation. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Allotransplantation; FK506; Immunosuppression; Submandibular salivary gland; Tacrolimus
Year: 2020 PMID: 32606281 PMCID: PMC7338634 DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.3.197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 1225-1585
Fig. 1Intraoperative clinical photographs for submandibular salivary gland (SMG) allotransplantation. A. Complete separation of the SMG in the donor rabbit with an intact linguofacial vein, common carotid artery, and silicon tube connected to Wharton’s duct. B. Harvested SMG over the receiver chin with proper orientation of the vessels. C. After vascular anastomosis and connection to the remaining distal Wharton’s duct of the receiver. D. After skin suturing and drain placement.
Body weight change and anorexia percentages
| Variable | FK506-H group | FK506-L group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight loss (kg) | 0.49±0.09 | 0.44±0.10 | 0.46±0.09 |
| Anorexia (%) | 66.6 | 50.0 | 58.3 |
(FK506-H: high-dose FK506 [0.16 mg/kg], FK506-L: low-dose FK506 [0.08 mg/kg])
Values are presented as mean¡¾standard error of the mean or %.
Complete blood count changes within the different groups
| Variable | Allo-Ctrl group | FK506-L group | FK506-H group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY (%) | 63.75±8.63 | 47.63±10.18 | 49.73±6.14 | 53.70±4.91 |
| MO (%) | 3.68±1.26 | 3.90±1.37 | 1.93±0.44 | 3.17±0.63 |
| Hgb (%) | 11.80±0.28 | 12.30±1.14 | 10.75±1.54 | 11.61±0.62 |
| HCT (fl) | 35.38±0.97 | 37.36±3.35 | 32.60±4.98 | 35.11±1.96 |
(Allo-Ctrl: allograft rejection control, FK506-L: low-dose FK506 [0.08 mg/kg], FK506-H: high-dose FK506 [0.16 mg/kg], LY: lymphocyte, MO: monocyte, Hgb: hemoglobin, HCT: hematocrit)
Values are presented as mean¡¾standard error of the mean.
Fig. 2Photomicrographs of allotransplanted glands as shown by H&E staining. A. Histological features of an allotransplanted gland with nearly normal glandular parenchyma structure (magnification, ×1.25; scale bar=200 μm). B. The same allotransplanted gland (magnification, ×20; scale bar=200 μm). C. Histological features of an allotransplanted gland with partial loss of the parenchyma (magnification, ×1.25; scale bar=200 μm). D. The same allotransplanted gland (magnification, ×20; scale bar=200 μm). E. Histological features of an allotransplanted gland with loss of the majority of the parenchyma and an abundance of fibrous tissue (magnification, ×1.25; scale bar=800 μm). F. The same allotransplanted gland (magnification, ×20; scale bar=50 μm). G. Histological features of a rejected allotransplanted gland with acini degeneration and marked inflammatory cells infiltration (magnification, ×1.25; scale bar=800 μm). H. The same rejected gland (magnification, ×20; scale bar=50 μm).