| Literature DB >> 32605654 |
Yunkoo Kang1,2, Jieun Kim3, Seung Kim2, Sowon Park2, Hyunjung Lim4,5, Hong Koh6.
Abstract
OBJECT: Measuring handgrip strength is a useful method to evaluate sarcopenia. No study has shown the trends of handgrip strength to weight ratio among Korean adolescents by year. This study aimed to determine the trends of handgrip strength among Korean adolescents using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Data of 2304 adolescents who participated in the KNHANES between 2014 and 2017 were obtained. The handgrip-to-weight ratios were categorized by age, sex, and year.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Handgrip Strength; Muscles; Sarcopenia
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32605654 PMCID: PMC7329499 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05112-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Participants characteristics in KNHANES 2014 to 2017
| Total (n = 2304) | 2014 (n = 483) | 2015 (n = 574) | 2016 (n = 634) | 2017 (n = 613) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 14.41 ± 0.06 | 14.28 ± 0.14 | 14.41 ± 0.13 | 14.47 ± 0.10 | 14.49 ± 0.14 | 0.067 | 0.272 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 108.54 ± 0.26 | 108.06 ± 0.61 | 108.90 ± 0.49 | 109.14 ± 0.53 | 108.05 ± 0.49 | 0.008 | 0.975 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 66.41 ± 0.22 | 65.70 ± 0.50 | 66.31 ± 0.40 | 66.94 ± 0.41 | 66.67 ± 0.47 | 0.349 | 0.098 |
| Height (cm) | 162.12 ± 0.28 | 161.69 ± 0.64 | 161.80 ± 0.53 | 162.32 ± 0.50 | 162.66 ± 0.50 | 0.343 | 0.180 |
| Weight (kg) | 56.08 ± 0.36 | 55.63 ± 0.86 | 57.14 ± 0.67 | 55.58 ± 0.68 | 55.96 ± 0.65 | − 0.069 | 0.838 |
| Waist (cm) | 71.05 ± 0.26 | 70.47 ± 0.55 | 72.73 ± 0.49 | 70.91 ± 0.49 | 70.09 ± 0.51 | − 0.319 | 0.188 |
| BMI (z-score) | 0.12 ± 0.32 | 0.10 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.68 | 0.01 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.06 | 0.117 | 0.115 |
| WtHR | 43.83 ± 0.14 | 43.55 ± 0.28 | 44.97 ± 0.28 | 43.69 ± 0.27 | 43.10 ± 0.28 | − 0.280 | 0.028 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 91.85 ± 0.23 | 92.33 ± 0.67 | 91.88 ± 0.34 | 91.82 ± 0.36 | 91.37 ± 0.41 | − 0.293 | 0.218 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 162.27 ± 0.66 | 157.52 ± 1.37 | 161.59 ± 1.23 | 164.01 ± 1.31 | 165.95 ± 1.35 | 2.755 | < 0.001 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 86.08 ± 1.29 | 85.52 ± 2.95 | 88.29 ± 2.69 | 84.89 ± 2.26 | 85.61 ± 2.41 | − 0.337 | 0.777 |
| AST (U/L) | 19.36 ± 0.23 | 18.87 ± 0.39 | 19.82 ± 0.66 | 19.14 ± 0.34 | 19.60 ± 0.40 | 0.143 | 0.438 |
| ALT (U/L) | 15.73 ± 0.46 | 14.87 ± 0.74 | 16.36 ± 1.22 | 15.55 ± 0.70 | 16.12 ± 0.94 | 0.284 | 0.465 |
Data presented as mean ± standard error with weighting of survey design
SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, WtHR waist to height ratio(waist(cm)/height(cm) × 100), TG triglyceride, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase
Fig. 1Trends of handgrip strength (a) and handgrip-to-weight ratio (×100) (b) of boy participants. Trends of handgrip strength (c) and handgrip-to-weight ratio (×100) (d) among girl participants
Fig. 2Trends of handgrip strength (a) and handgrip-to-weight ratio (×100) (b) by sex. Trends of handgrip strength and handgrip-to-weight ratio among adolescents (boys and girls) over the years 2014 to 2017 (c). The HG and HGtW significantly decreased from 2014 to 2017 (*P for trend < 0.05) P for trend was analyzed by linear regression with applying weight factors of survey design