| Literature DB >> 32605291 |
Asmaa Mecheta1, Amine Hanachi2, Carole Jeandel2, Elmira Arab-Tehrany2, Arnaud Bianchi3, Emilie Velot4, Karim Mezali1, Michel Linder2.
Abstract
To promote the nutritional and pharmacological values of four sea cucumber sEntities:
Keywords: ACE; Algerian coast; PUFA; nanoliposome; peptide; phospholipids; sea cucumbers
Year: 2020 PMID: 32605291 PMCID: PMC7412306 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25132972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Proximate composition (%) of the studied sea cucumbers body wall compared to other species from the Red Sea and Pacific Ocean. Mean ± SD [n = 3].
| Species | Moisture (%) | Ash (%) | Protein (%) | Lipid (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 67.76 ± 0.94 | 41.78 ± 1.82 | 69.34 ± 4.13 | 5.53 ± 0.59 | This study |
|
| 61.85 ± 2.62 | 40.77 ± 0.60 | 49.26 ± 0.76 | 3.81 ± 0.25 | This study |
|
| 64.55 ± 0.42 | 47.31 ± 0.88 | 66.41 ± 0.90 | 2.57 ± 0.28 | This study |
|
| 66.21 ± 1.34 | 31.58 ± 0.10 | 59.36 ± 2.32 | 3.07 ± 0.50 | This study |
|
| 72.12 ± 0.25 | 45.16 ± 0.22 | 44.56 ± 0.04 | 0.88 ± 0.05 | [ |
|
| 76.54 ± 0.09 | 31.81 ± 0.34 | 66.86 ± 0.06 | 0.76 ± 0.02 | [ |
|
| 81.41 ± 0.60 | 4.3 ± 0.20 | 45.71 ± 0.20 | 4.60 ± 0.30 | [ |
|
| 84.34 ± 0.72 | 30.45 ± 6.79 | 63.64 ± 4.56 | 1.12 ± 0.28 | [ |
|
| 85.76 ± 0.30 | 2.26 ± 0.15 | 43.43 ± 0.20 | 5.66 ± 0.09 | [ |
|
| 90.81 ± 2.08 | 37.40 ± 4.60 | 48.26 ± 2.32 | 2.35 | [ |
Lipid classes of the body wall of the studied sea cucumbers (%) by Iatroscan. Mean ± SD [n = 3].
| Species | Neutral Lipids (%) | Phospholipids (%) | Glycolipids (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4.56 ± 0.25 | 69.02 ± 0.78 | 23.54 ± 0.56 |
|
| 5.12 ± 0.18 | 79.23 ± 0.11 | 12.89 ± 0.69 |
|
| 6.43 ± 0.33 | 71.37 ± 0.58 | 19.79 ± 0.52 |
|
| 3.55 ± 0.21 | 80.22 ± 0.32 | 13.63 ± 0.01 |
Fatty acid compositions of the studied holothurians (%) analysed by CPG. Mean ± SD [n = 3]; not detected.
| Fatty Acids |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.43 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 1.32 ± 0.15 | 0.85 ± 0.00 |
|
| 1.31 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.15 | 0.93 ± 0.02 |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 1.87 ± 0.01 | 0.84 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.39 ± 0.00 |
| 0.45 ± 0.00 | 0.30 ± 0.01 |
|
| 4.62 ± 0.19 | 2.68 ± 0.16 | 14.6 ± 0.00 | 4.15 ± 0.07 |
|
| 1.24 ± 0.10 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 0.95 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.02 |
|
| 7.56 ± 0.51 | 5.87 ± 0.14 | 11.9 ± 0.07 | 7.92 ± 0.16 |
|
| 0.87 ± 0.05 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.01 | 1.04 ± 0.02 |
|
| 18.10 ± 0.8 | 12.21 ± 0.36 | 32.38 ± 0.29 | 16.00 ± 0.17 |
|
| 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.00 | 0.40 ± 0.01 |
|
| 3.21 ± 0.76 | 1.74 ± 0.09 | 4.82 ± 0.01 | 3.38 ± 0.67 |
|
| 6.12 ± 0.10 | 5.81 ± 0.14 | 6.58 ± 0.06 | 5.51 ± 0.12 |
|
| 3.40 ± 0.10 | 3.58 ± 0.22 | 2.38 ± 0.01 | 4.07 ± 0.09 |
|
| 2.26 ± 0.65 | 2.47 ± 0.06 | 2.02 ± 0.01 | 1.87 ± 0.23 |
|
| 15.60 ± 0.65 | 14.39 ± 0.39 | 16.52 ± 0.99 | 14.48 ± 0.21 |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.59 ± 0.00 | 0.63 ± 0.00 |
|
| 12.6 ± 0.44 | 15.0 ± 0.01 | 9.62 ± 0.03 | 11.2 ± 0.28 |
|
| 1.94 ± 0.04 | 2.11 ± 0.07 | 3.96 ± 0.02 | 2.61 ± 0.06 |
|
| 2.83 ± 0.07 | 2.95 ± 0.15 | 2.79 ± 0.04 | 4.10 ± 0.15 |
|
| 10.0 ± 0.35 | 11.0 ± 0.27 | 7.26 ± 0.03 | 9.33 ± 0.04 |
|
| 1.57 ± 0.04 | 1.55 ± 0.10 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | 1.44 ± 0.06 |
|
| 16.5 ± 0.58 | 18.9 ± 0.21 | 10.5 ± 0.03 | 15.3 ± 0.63 |
|
| 2.34 ± 0.03 | 2.11 ± 0.10 | 1.56 ± 0.02 | 3.24 ± 0.04 |
|
| 2.02 ± 0.09 | 1.87 ± 0.12 | 1.24 ± 0.01 | 1.35 ± 0.30 |
|
| 7.90 ± 0.28 | 8.76 ± 0.23 | 5.07 ± 0.04 | 8.62 ± 0.03 |
|
| 1.71 ± 0.02 | 3.15 ± 0.22 | ||
|
| 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.00 | ||
|
| 1.01 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.10 | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 1.60 ± 0.05 |
|
| 6.56 ± 0.53 | 7.25 ± 0.12 | 4.86 ± 0.12 | 4.97 ± 0.29 |
|
| 60.78 ± 0.02 | 71.80 ± 0.69 | 50.90 ± 0.84 | 67.6 ± 0.23 |
|
| 21.3 ± 0.72 | 30.00 ± 0.35 | 17.40 ± 0.31 | 20.1 ± 0.53 |
|
| 31.5 ± 0.76 | 24.18 ± 0.30 | 23.30 ± 0.36 | 19.4 ± 0.43 |
|
| 0.67 ± 0.00 | 0.80 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.00 | 1.03 ± 0.07 |
Melting temperatures and fusion enthalpies (∆H) of the studied sea cucumbers oils determined by DSC (−80–80 °C).
| Species | Melting Temperatures (°C) | ∆H (J/g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| −41.71 | 3.74 |
|
| 2.41 | 0.87 |
|
| −33.33 | 5.79 |
|
| −2.56 | 0.81 |
General peak Wavenumber (cm−1) and assignments of the FTIR spectra of vibration of the four sea cucumbers oils in the wave number range of 4000–400 cm−1.
| Assignment | Peak Wavenumber (cm−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| υas(CH2) | 2925 | 2924 | 2922 | 2920 |
| υsym(CH | 2854 | 2848 | 2848 | 2850 |
| υ(C=O) | 1739 | 1633 | 1629 | 1624 |
| δas(CH2)sciss | 1471 | 1460 | 1442 | 1440 |
| 1408 | 1404 | 1400 | 1402 | |
| γ(CH2) | 1163 | 1163 | 1163 | 1163 |
| υ(C | 1004 | 1022 | 1020 | 1024 |
| γ( | 900 | 904 | 906 | 904 |
| 754 | 754 | 752 | 756 | |
as = antisymmetric, sym = symmetric; sciss = scissoring; υ = stretching; δ = deformation vibration (bend); p = rocking vibration; γ = out of plane deformation.
Phospholipids compositions of the studied sea cucumber after acetone purification. Mean ± SD [n = 3].
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phospholipids, PL (%) | 55.20 ± 0.22 | 61.02 ± 0.17 | 63.09 ± 0.11 | 69.85 ± 0.02 |
| Cardiolipin, CL (%) | 10.14 ± 0.05 | 5.13 ± 1.24 | 6.50 ± 0.41 | 11.25 ± 0.41 |
| Phosphatidylglycerol, PG (%) | 14.38 ± 0.25 | 10.02 ± 0.53 | 14.08 ± 0,08 | 9.10 ± 0.42 |
| Phosphatidylcholine, PC (%) | 55.11 ± 0.41 | 58.57 ± 1.11 | 58.56 ± 0.80 | 51.48 ± 0.19 |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine, PE (%) | 8.10 ± 0.05 | 6.72 ± 0.00 | 6.31 ± 0.45 | 7.51 ± 0.04 |
| Phosphatidylserine, PS (%) | 6.47 ± 0.18 | 0.91 ± 0.10 | 1.12 ± 0.11 | 1.31 ± 0.03 |
Figure 1Degree of hydrolysis of H. poli, H. tubulosa, H. arguinensis, and H. sanctori, using Alcalase 2.4 L and Neutrase 0.8 L at 2% and 5%. The error bars represent standard deviation of means ± SD of at least three hydrolysis (n = 3) for each sea cucumber and at each enzyme concentration. (A): Degree of hydrolysis with Alcalase 2.4L at 2%; (B): Degree of hydrolysis with Alcalase 2.4L at 5%; (C): Degree of hydrolysis with Neutrase 0.8 L at 2%; (D): Degree of hydrolysis with Neutrase 0.8 L at 5%.
IC50 values obtained from the studied sea cucumbers hydrolysates (Alcalase 5%, <1 kDa).
| Species | IC50 (mg/mL) |
|---|---|
|
| 0.51 ± 0.02 |
|
| 0.31 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.35 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.30 ± 0.00 |
Mean ± SD [n = 3].
Figure 2Impact of hydrolysates on metabolic activity. Human MSCs were exposed to increasing concentrations of hydrolysates (0.05, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/mL) for 7 days. Metabolic activity was assessed using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium) (MTT) assay. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) release was determined as described under the Materials and Methods section. DNA concentrations were measured to estimate the proliferation of the cells. For each tested condition, the cell metabolic activity results are presented in% versus control (Cont.) condition (100%). The error bars represent standard deviation of means ± SD of at least three individual experiments. * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001 compared to control for each time point.
Figure 3Impact of nanoliposomes without hydrolysates (Lipo 0.1) and with hydrolysates (Lipo 0.1+ Hydro 0.1) on human MSC. Human MSCs were exposed to nanoliposomes alone (0.1 mg/mL) or hydrolysates in nanoliposomes (0.1 mg/mL) for 7 days. Metabolic activity was assessed using an MTT assay, LDH release was determined as described under the Materials and Methods section, DNA concentrations were measured to estimate the proliferation of the cells. The results shown for H. poli, H. tubulosa, H. arguinensis, and H. sanctori are mean ± SD of at least three individual experiments. ** p < 0.001 compared to control for each point. The control condition for MSC metabolic activity was used as the reference value.